Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 25–46 | Cite as

Does Religion Affect the Materialism of Consumers? An Empirical Investigation of Buddhist Ethics and the Resistance of the Self

  • Stefano PaceEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of Buddhist ethics on consumers’ materialism, that is, the propensity to attach a fundamental role to possessions. The literature shows that religion and religiosity influence various attitudes and behaviors of consumers, including their ethical beliefs and ethical decisions. However, most studies focus on general religiosity rather than on the specific doctrinal ethical tenets of religions. The current research focuses on Buddhism and argues that it can tame materialism directly, similar to other religions, and through the specific Buddhist ethical doctrines of the Four Immeasurables: compassion, loving kindness, empathetic joy, and equanimity. The empirical results show the following: (1) Buddhism reduces materialism directly and through some of the Four Immeasurables, and (2) despite the doctrine of non-existence of the self, positive emotions toward the self are still present, and the self absorbs the effects of Buddhist ethics on materialism. The latter finding suggests a “resistance of the self” that is coherent with the idea of a consumer who leverages the self to go beyond it.

Keywords

Consumer behavior Materialism Consumer ethics Religion Buddhism 

References

  1. Ahuvia, A. (2008). If money doesn’t make us happy, why do we act as if it does? Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(4), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, A. J., & Gibbs, M. (1998). Foundation of business ethics in contemporary religious thought: The Ten Commandment perspective. International Journal of Social Economics, 25(10), 1552–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnhill, D. L. (2004). Good work: An engaged Buddhist response to the dilemmas of consumerism. Buddhist–Christian Studies, 24, 55–63.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). Moderator–mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk, R. W. (1983). Worldly possessions: Issues and criticism. In R. P. Bagozzi & A. M. Tyhout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 514–519). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  7. Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. In T. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 11, pp. 291–297). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  8. Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisited inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 326–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belk, R. W., & Tumbat, G. (2005). The Cult of Macintosh. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 8(3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belk, R. W., Wallendorf, M., & Sherry, J. F., Jr. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bjarnason, B. (2007). Concept analysis of religiosity. Home Health Care Management Practice, 19, 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brazier, C. (2003). Buddhist psychology. Liberate your mind, embrace your life. London: Robinson.Google Scholar
  15. Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer research, 29(3), 348–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corner, P. D. (2009). Workplace spirituality and business ethics: Insights from an eastern spiritual tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowar, H. (1998). Are there religious responses to global ethical issues? In D. C. McCance (Ed.), Life ethics in world religions (pp. 157–171). Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Studies in Religion.Google Scholar
  19. Daniels, P. L. (2005). Economic systems and the Buddhist world view: The 21st century nexus. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dittmar, H. (2008). I shop therefore I am? Compulsive buying and identity seeking. In H. Dittmar (Ed.), Consumer culture, identity and well-being (pp. 95–120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  21. Drèze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2010). Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers, perceptions of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 890–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esposito, J. L., Fasching, D. J., & Lewis, T. (2006). World religions today. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Faure, B. (2009). Unmasking Buddhism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernandez, K. V., & Lastovicka, J. L. (2011). Making magic: Fetishes in contemporary consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(August), 278–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1990). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  28. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fournier, S., & Richins, M. L. (1991). Some theoretical and popular notions concerning materialism. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 403–413.Google Scholar
  30. Furby, L. (1978). Possessions: Toward a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle. In P. B. Baltes (Ed.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 297–336). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Furnham, A., & Valgeirsson, H. (2007). The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 677–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gould, S. J. (1991). The self-manipulation of my pervasive, perceived vital energy through product use: An introspective-praxis perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gould, S. J. (1995a). Researcher introspection as a method in consumer research: applications, issues, and implications. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 719–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gould, S. J. (1995b). The Buddhist perspective on business ethics: Experiential exercises for exploration and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gould, S. J. (2006). Cooptation through conflation: Spiritual materialism is not the same as spirituality. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 9(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, S. (2011). Does anātman rationally entail altruism? On Bodhicaryāvatāra 8:101–103. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 18, 93–123.Google Scholar
  37. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaza, S. (2000). Overcoming the grip of consumerism. Buddhist–Christian Studies, 20, 23–42.Google Scholar
  39. King, S. B. (2009). Socially engaged Buddhism. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  40. Knitter, P. F. (2004). Overcoming greed: Buddhists and Christians in consumerist society. Buddhist-Christian Studies, 24, 65–72.Google Scholar
  41. Kraus, S., & Sears, S. (2009). Measuring the immeasurables: Development and initial validation of the Self-Other Four Immeasurables (SOFI) scale based on Buddhist teachings on loving kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Social Indicators Research, 92, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kristeller, J. L., & Johnson, T. (2005). Cultivating loving kindness: A two-stage model of the effects of meditation on empathy compassion, and altruism. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 40(2), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. La Barbera, P. A., & Gürhan, Z. (1995). The role of materialism, religiosity, and demographics in subjective well-being. Psychology & Marketing, 14(1), 71–97.Google Scholar
  44. Lastovicka, J. L., & Sirianni, N. J. (2011). Truly, madly, deeply: Consumers in the throes of material possessions love. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 323–342.Google Scholar
  45. Luedicke, M. K., Thompson, C. J., & Giesler, M. (2010). Consumer identity work as moral protagonism: How myth and ideology animate a brand-mediated moral conflict. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 1016–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marques, J. (2010). Spiritual considerations for managers: What matters most to workforce members in challenging times. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mick, D. G., & Demoss, M. (1990). Self-gifts: Phenomenological Insights from four contexts. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moschis, J. P., & Ong, F. S. (2011). Religiosity and consumer behavior of older adults: A study of subcultural influences in Malaysia. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Muncy, J. A., & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Muñiz, A. M., Jr., & Schau, H. J. (2005). Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neumaier, E. K. (1998). Buddhists within the moral space of non-duality. In D. C. McCance (Ed.), Life ethics in world religions (pp. 41–52). Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Studies in Religion.Google Scholar
  52. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  53. O’Guinn, T. C., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Heaven on earth: Consumption at Heritage Village, USA. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(September), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Possamai, A. (2009). Sociology of religion for generations X and Y. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  55. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Queen, C. (2000). Introduction: A new Buddhism. In C. Queen (Ed.), Engaged Buddhism in the west (pp. 1–34). Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Rambelli, F. (2007). Buddhist materiality: A cultural history of objects in Japanese Buddhism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rindfleisch, J. (2005). Consuming the self: New age spirituality as “social product” in consumer society. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8(4), 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Saren, M. (2007). To have is to be? A critique of self-creation through consumption. Marketing Review, 7(4), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schouten, J. W., McAlexander, J. H., & Koenig, H. F. (2007). Transcendent customer experience and brand community. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  64. Shankar, A., Whittaker, J., & Fitchett, J. A. (2006). Heaven knows I’m miserable now. Marketing Theory, 6(4), 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sivaraksa, S. (2003). Alternative to consumerism. In R. S. Gottlieb (Ed.), Liberating faith: Religious voices for justice, peace, and ecological wisdom (pp. 287–291). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  66. St. James, Y., Handelman, J. M., & Taylor, S. F. (2011). Magical thinking and consumer coping, Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 632–649.Google Scholar
  67. Trungpa, C. (1973). Cutting through spiritual materialism. Berkeley, CA: Shambala.Google Scholar
  68. Vitell, S. J. (2010). The role of religiosity in business and consumer ethics: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J., & Singh, J. J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vitell, S. J., Singh, J. J., & Paolillo, J. (2007). ‘Consumers’ ethical beliefs: The roles of money, religiosity and attitude toward business. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wallace, B. A. (1999). In Z. Houshmand (Ed.), The Four Immeasurables: Cultivating a boundless heart. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lions Publications.Google Scholar
  72. Watts, A. W. (1975). The way of Zen. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  73. Yoo, B., & Lee, S. H. (2009). Buy genuine luxury fashion products or counterfeits? Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 280–286.Google Scholar
  74. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(August), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MarketingBocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations