Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 111, Issue 2, pp 195–210 | Cite as

The Corporation is Ailing Social Technology: Creating a ‘Fit for Purpose’ Design for Sustainability

  • L. Metcalf
  • S. Benn


Designed to facilitate economic development, the corporate form now threatens human survival. This article presents an argument that organisations are yet to be ‘fit for purpose’ and that the corporate form needs to be re-designed to reach sustainability. It suggests that organisations need to recognise their agent status amongst a much wider and highly complex array of interconnected, dynamic economic, environmental and social systems. Human Factors theory is drawn on to propose that business systems could be made sustainable through re-design. They could fit their environment more appropriately by improving: Efficiency, Adaptability and Social Cohesion. Leaders of organisations would also need to take a holistic approach to alter the organisation proactively to adapt to the systems within which it is embedded.


Complex adaptive systems Complexity leadership Corporate social responsibility Human factors Sustainability 


  1. Accenture. (2010). A New Era of Sustainability: CEO reflections on progress to date, challenges ahead and the impact of the journey toward a sustainable economy. Accenture Institute for High Performance.Google Scholar
  2. Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral/theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Annan, K. (2002). Toward a sustainable future. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 44(7), 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arena, C. (2004). Cause for success: 10 companies that put profit second and came in first. Novato: New World Library.Google Scholar
  6. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (2011). Creating readiness for organisational change. Human Relations, 64(10), 681–703.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, D., & Boyle, S. E. (1977). Sales revenue maximization: An empirical investigation. Industrial Organization Review, 5(1), 46–55.Google Scholar
  8. Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
  9. Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(2), 143–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bannerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bansal, P. (2002). The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. The Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benn, S., & Baker, E. (2009). Advancing sustainability through change and innovation: A co-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benn, S., & Kramar, R. (2011). Educating for sustainability and CSR. What is the role of business schools? Introduction. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(5), 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benn, S., & Martin, A. (2010). Learning and change for sustainability reconsidered: A role for boundary objects. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza Kintana, M. (2010). Ownership structure and corporate response to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 82–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bingham, J. B., Dyer, G. W., Smith, I., & Adams, G. L. (2011). A stakeholder identity orientation approach to corporate social performance in family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 565–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Blackwell, R. (2008, November 10). The double-edged sword of corporate altruism. The Globe and Mail.Google Scholar
  20. Boston Consulting Group. (2009). The business of sustainability: Imperatives, advantages and actions, Boston at Accessed 20 August 2011.
  21. Bohm, P. (1972). Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment. European Economic Review, 3(2), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Braungart, M., McDonough, M., & Bollinger, A. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions—a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13–14), 1337–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brubaker, E. R. (1975). Free ride, free revelation or golden rule? The Journal of Law and Economics, 18(1), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Burke, W. W., & Hornstein, H. A. (1972). The social technology of organization development. Fairfax, VA: Learning Resources Corp./University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  25. Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders (Balancing Economic, Legal, and Social Responsibilities). Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Catton, W. R., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Paradigms, theories, and the primacy of the HEP-NEP distinction. The American Sociologist, 13(Nov), 256–259.Google Scholar
  28. Chan, K. C., Fung, H., & Yau, J. (2010). Business ethics research: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chase, S. (2007, October 1). Climate change top issue, CEOs declare. The Globe and Mail.Google Scholar
  30. Chort, V. (2007, December 3). Climate change is more than hot air and protocol. The Globe and Mail.Google Scholar
  31. Cohen-Rosenthal, E. (2000). A walk on the human side of industrial ecology. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 245–264.Google Scholar
  32. Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29, 341–358.Google Scholar
  33. Coleman, A. (1982). Game theory and experimental games. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  34. Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 32(7–8), 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., & van de Kragt, J. C. (1986). Doing well and doing good as ways of resolving social dilemmas. In H. A. M. Wilke, D. M. Messick, & C. G. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 177–203). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Doh, J., & Guay, T. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, Special Issue, Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, 43, 47–73.Google Scholar
  37. Donadio, R., & Kitsantonis, N. (2011, October 19) Thousands in Greece protest austerity bill. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  38. Donaldson, G., & Lorsch, J. W. (1983). Decision making at the top. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Dooley, K. (1996). A nominal definition of complex adaptive systems. Accessed 13 October, 2009.
  40. Dumas, J. S., & Salzman, M. C. (2006). Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 2). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Google Scholar
  41. Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2007). Organizational change for corporate sustainability: A guide for leaders and change agents of the future. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Dyke, B., & Schroeder, D. (2005). Management, theology and moral points of view: Towards an alternative to the conventional materialist-individualist ideal-type of management. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 705–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor? The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism. New York: Demos, A Network for Ideas & Action.Google Scholar
  44. Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ehrenfeld, J. (2000). Industrial ecology: Paradigm shift or normal science. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 229–244.Google Scholar
  46. Ehrenfeld, J. R. (2005). The roots of sustainability. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 23–25.Google Scholar
  47. Einstein, A. (1946, May 25). Atomic education urged by Einstein: Scientists in plea for $200,000 to promote new type of essential thinking. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  48. Friedman, M. (1970, September 3). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  49. Friedman, T. L. (2008). Hot, flat, and crowded 2.0: Why we need a green revolution—and how it can renew America. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  50. Gaddy, C. D., & Wachtel, J. A. (1992). Team skills training in nuclear power plant operations. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 379–396). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  51. Garnaut, R. (2011). The Garnaut review 2011: Australia in the global response to climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, R. (2003). Explaining altruistic behaviour in humans. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 24, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Global Compact Critics. (2008). UN’s new water advisor calls the Global Compact “bluewashing”. Global Compact Critics Blog. Accessed 10 December 2008.
  55. Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874–907.Google Scholar
  56. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.Google Scholar
  57. Goodman, P. S. (2008, July). Too big to fail? The New York Times. Retrieved 19 October 2011.Google Scholar
  58. Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Amazeen, P. G. (2010a). Training adaptive team. Human Factors, 52(2), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Salas, E. (2010b). Preface to the special issue on collaboration, coordination, and adaptation in complex sociotechnical settings. Human Factors, 52(2), 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gorman, J. C., Cooke, N. J., & Winner, J. L. (2006). Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49, 1312–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Grant, A. M., Dutton, J. E., & Rosso, B. D. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 898–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Grey, C. (2008). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organisations. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  63. Grit, K. (2004). Corporate citizenship: How to strengthen the social responsibility of managers? Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Guardian. (2011, October 17). The Occupy movement: From local action to a global howl of protest. The Guardian. Retrieved 19 October 2011.Google Scholar
  65. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 996–1014.Google Scholar
  66. Hart, S. (2005). Capitalism at the crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems. Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Harvey, F. (2007, January 22). Environment tops EU business leaders’ list of concerns. Financial Times, 8.Google Scholar
  69. Hawken, P. (2007). Blessed unrest. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  70. Herendeen, J. B., & Schechter, M. C. (1977). Alternative models of the corporate enterprise: Growth maximization, an empirical test. Southern Economic Journal, 43(4), 1505–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hoffman, A. (2003). Linking social systems analysis to the industrial ecology framework. Organization & Environment, 16, 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Helix Books.Google Scholar
  73. Jackson, I. A., & Nelson, J. (2004). Profits with principles: Seven strategies for delivering value with values. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  74. Jones, M., & Millar, C. (2011). About global leadership and global ethics, and a possible moral compass: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Klein, G. (1999). Applied decision making. In P.A. Hancock (Ed.), Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse and abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253.Google Scholar
  77. Klein, N. (2007). Shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  78. Kolk, A. (2005). Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or divergence? Management International Review, 45(1), 145–166.Google Scholar
  79. Korten, D. C. (1995). When corporations rule the world. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  80. Lamberton, G. (2005). Sustainable sufficiency: An internally consistent version of sustainability. Sustainable Development, 13, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Langton, C. G. (Ed.). (1989). Artificial life. Sante Fe Institute studies in the sciences of complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  82. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lave, L. (1962). An empirical approach to the prisoner’s dilemma game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 76, 424–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Maner, J. K., Richey, J. A., Cromer, K., & Mallott, M. (2007). Dispositional anxiety and risk-avoidant decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 665–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Maon, F., Lindgreen, F., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organisational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2005). United Kingdom: An explicit model of business-society relations. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wagner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 51–66). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  91. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  93. MG, K. P. (2005). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. Amsterdam, NL: KPMG International.Google Scholar
  94. MG, K. P. (2008). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2008. Amsterdam, NL: KPMG International.Google Scholar
  95. Milne, M., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Business makes a ‘journey’ out of ‘sustainability’: Creating adventures in Wonderland? Organization, 13(6), 801–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  97. Monsen, R. J., Chieu, J. S., & Cooley, D. E. (1968). The effect of separation of ownership and control on the performance of the large firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Morel, B., & Ramanujam, R. (1999). Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organization as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science, 10, 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mouawad, J., & Krauss, C. (2010, June 3). Another torrent BP works to stem: It’s CEO. New York Times.Google Scholar
  100. Nemeth, C. P. (2005). Health care forensics. In Y. I. Noy & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Handbook of human factors in litigation. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  101. Newton, T. J. (2002). Creating the new ecological order? Elias and actor-network theory. Academy of Management Review, 27, 523–540.Google Scholar
  102. New York Times. (2011, October 3). The economic crisis and market upheavals. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  103. Nikiforuk, A. (2008). Pandemonium: How globalization and trade are putting the world at risk. Brisbane: University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  104. Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of the triple bottom line. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Okhuysen, G., & Bonardi, J. P. (2011). Editors’ comments: The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Parker, D. (1991). Privatisation ten years on: A critical analysis of its rationale and results. Working paper. Working and occasional paper series. Cranfield University, School of Management.Google Scholar
  107. Pirson, M., & Lawrence, P. (2010). Humanism in business—Towards a paradigm shift? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Plowman, D. A., Solansky, S., Beck, T. E., Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., & Travis, D. V. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent, self-organisation. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Pollard, D., Almond, R., Duncan, E., Gooten, M., Hadeed, L., Jeffries, B., & McLellan, R. (Eds.). (2010). Living planet report 2010. Switzerland: World Wide Fund for Nature Gland.Google Scholar
  110. Porter, E. H. (1964). Manpower development: The system training concept. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  111. Porter, T., & Cordoba, J. (2009). Three views of systems theories and their implications for sustainability education. Journal of Management Education, 33, 23–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Purser, R. E., Park, C., & Montouri, A. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organisation paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1053–1089.Google Scholar
  113. Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46.Google Scholar
  114. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organisational accidents. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  115. Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal, 320, 768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Riaz, S. (2009). The global financial crisis: An institutional theory analysis. Critical Perspectives in International Business, 5, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rogers, R. (2000). The usury debate, the sustainability debate, and the call for a moral economy. Ecological Economics, 35, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rusinko, C., & Sama, L. (2009). Greening and sustainability across the management curriculum: An extended journey. Journal of Management Education, 33(3), 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Senser, R. A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: A fledgling movement faces a crucial test. Dissent, Winter, 77–82.Google Scholar
  120. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 118–137.Google Scholar
  122. Simon, H. (1987). Behavioral economics. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 1, 221–224.Google Scholar
  123. Simon, J. G., & Kahn, H. (Eds.). (1984). The resourceful earth: A response to global 2000. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  124. Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalisation. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  125. Smith, A. (1999, 1776). The wealth of nations IVV. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  126. Smith, A. (2011, April 6). New systems ratings puts a spotlight on ethics. Financial Times, 11.Google Scholar
  127. Sovacool, B. K. (2010). Broken by design: The corporation as a failed technology. Science Technology and Society, 15(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Stacey, R. D. (2000). Complexity and management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  129. Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  130. Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organisations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.Google Scholar
  131. Starik, M., Rands, G., Marcus, A., & Clark, T. (2011). Sustainability in management education. Introduction. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Starkey, K., & Crane, A. (2003). Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic. Academy of Management Review, 28, 220–237.Google Scholar
  133. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Stern, G., & Feldman, R. (2004). Too big to fail. Washington, MA: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  135. Steurer, R., Langer, M., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Stiglitz, J. E. (2006). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  137. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  138. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Valente, M. (2010). Demystifying the struggles of private sector paradigmatic change: Business as an agent in a complex adaptive system. Business and Society, 49(3), 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. van Marrewijk, M., & Hardjono, T. (2003). European corporate sustainability framework for managing complexity and corporate transformation. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  143. Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Ward, H., & Smith, C. N. (2007). Corporate social responsibility at a crossroads? Business Strategy Review, 18(1), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Woller, G. (1996). Business ethics, society, and Adam Smith: Some observations on the liberal business ethos. Journal of Socio-Economics, 25(3), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zerk, J. A. (2006). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility: Limitations and opportunities in international law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Zimmerman, B. H., Lindberg, C., & Plsek, P. (1998). Edgeware: Insights from complexity science for health care leaders. Irving, TX: VHA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia
  2. 2.University of Technology, SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations