Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 323–338 | Cite as

Ethical Blindness

  • Guido PalazzoEmail author
  • Franciska Krings
  • Ulrich Hoffrage


Many models of (un)ethical decision making assume that people decide rationally and are in principle able to evaluate their decisions from a moral point of view. However, people might behave unethically without being aware of it. They are ethically blind. Adopting a sensemaking approach, we argue that ethical blindness results from a complex interplay between individual sensemaking activities and context factors.


Ethical decision-making Ethical/unethical behavior Ethical fading Moral disengagement Bounded awareness/ethicality Rigid framing 


  1. Arendt, H. (1963). Eichman in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: The Vinking Press.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ash, S. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashkanasy, N. M., Windsor, C. A., & Trevino, L. (2006). Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: Cognitive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethical decision-making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  12. Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 410–424. Google Scholar
  13. Blank, H., Musch, J., & Pohl, R. (2007). Hindsight bias: On being wise after the event. Social Cognition, 25, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blass, T. (1991). Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2000a). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 471–499). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., Elliot, J. D., Reizenstein, R. M., & McCline, R. L. (1995). Releasing the beast: A study of compliance with orders to use race as a selection criterion. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R. R., Pugh, S. D., & Vaslow, J. B. (2000b). Just doing business: Modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Browning, C. R. (2001). Ordinary men. Reserve police battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram. Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Butterfield, K. D., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Chabris, C., & Simons, D. (2010). The invisible gorilla: And other ways our intuitions deceive us. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  24. Chugh, D., Banaji, M. R., & Bazerman, M. H. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. (2007). Bounded awareness: What you fail to see can hurt you. Mind & Society, 6, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clinard, M. B., & Yeager, P. C. (1980). Corporate crime. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Crane, A. (2000). Corporate greening as amoralization. Organization Studies, 21, 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Selective perception: A note on the departmental identification of executives. Sociometry, 21, 360–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kaptein, M. (2008). Spiraling down into corruption: A dynamic analysis of the social identity processes that cause corruption in organizations to grow. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60, 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19, 252–284.Google Scholar
  35. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1996). Edge-assignment and figure-ground segmentation in short-term visual matching. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 248–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Hodson, G. (2005). Instrumental relations among groups: Group competition, conflict, and prejudice. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice. Fifty years after Allport (pp. 227–243). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Feldman, S. P. (2004). The culture of objectivity: Quantification, uncertainty, and the evaluation of risk at NASA. Human Relations, 57, 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fennell, M., & Alexander, J. A. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 456–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Fleming, P., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2008). The escalation of deception in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 837–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Foldy, E. G., Goldman, L., & Ospina, S. (2008). Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 514–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed., Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  45. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Frederick, R. E., & Hoffman, W. M. (1995). Environmental risk problems and the language of ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(4), 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Friedman, M., (1970, Sept 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. New York Times Magazine. (Reprinted in Donaldson, T., & Werhane, P. H. (Eds.). (1970). Ethical issues in business (pp. 217–223). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  49. Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: Method, theory and application (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13–47.Google Scholar
  51. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral intuition = Fast and frugal heuristics? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Moral satisficing: Rethinking morality as bounded rationality. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 528–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gioia, D. A. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gonin, M., Palazzo, G., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Neither bad apple nor bad barrel: How the societal context impacts unethical behavior in organizations. Business Ethics: A European Review (forthcoming). Google Scholar
  55. Gramsci, A. (1971). The prison notebooks: Selections. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Hagan, J., & Rymond-Richmond, W. (2008). The collective dynamics of racial dehumanization and genocidal victimization in Darfur. American Sociological Review, 73, 875–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, methods, and point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  60. Hawkins, S. A., & Hastie, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgment of the past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hoffrage, U. (2011). How people can behave irresponsibly and unethically without noticing it. In G. Palazzo & M. Wentland (Eds.), Practising responsible management in the 21st century. Paris: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  62. Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 566–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hoffrage, U., & Pohl, R. (2003). Research on Hindsight bias: A rich past, a productive present, and a challenging future. Memory, 11, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 5–17.Google Scholar
  65. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes. The world of corporate managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  67. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  69. Jonas, H. (1985). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  71. Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  75. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Sage: London.Google Scholar
  76. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant!. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  77. Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2004). A social-cognitive approach to the moral personality. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self and identity (pp. 189–212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  78. Lee, M., & Ermann, M. D. (1999). Pinto “madness” as a flawed landmark narrative: An organisational and network analysis. Social Problems, 46, 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ley Toffler, B., & Reingold, J. (2003). Final accounting. Ambition, greed, and the fall of Arthur Andersen. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  81. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  82. March, J. G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 26, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mazzoni, G., & Vannucci, M. (2007). Hindsight bias, the misinformation effect, and false autobiographical memories. Social Cognition, 25, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. McAdams, D. P. (2009). The person: An introduction to the science of personality psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  88. McDevitt, R., Giapponi, C., & Tromley, C. (2007). A model of ethical decision making: The integration of process and content. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. McLean, B., & Elkind, P. (2003). The smartest guys in the room: The amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron. Penguin books: New York.Google Scholar
  90. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1994). Fit, failure and the hall of fame. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  91. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  92. Miller, D. (1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 116–138.Google Scholar
  93. Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs. A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  94. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 750–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Narvaez, D., Lapsley, D. K., Hagele, S., & Lasky, B. (2006). Moral chronicity and social information processing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to the moral personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 966–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J Gibson (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  97. Ng, D., Westgren, R., & Sonka, S. (2009). Competitive blind spots in an institutional field. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Oestreich, J. E. (2002). What can business do to appease anti-globalization protestors? Business and Society Review, 107, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Packer, D. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Science, 3, 301–304.Google Scholar
  101. Pauly, D. (1995). Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  103. Petersen, L.-E., & Dietz, J. (2000). Social discrimination in a personnel selection context: The effects of an authority’s instruction to discriminate and followers’ authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Petersen, L.-E., & Dietz, J. (2005). Prejudice and enforcement of workforce homogeneity as explanations for employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Petersen, L.-E., & Krings, F. (2009). Are ethical codes of conduct toothless tigers for dealing with employment discrimination? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Pohl, R. F., Eisenhauer, M., & Hardt, O. (2003). SARA—a cognitive process model to simulate anchoring effect and hindsight bias. Memory, 11, 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Popper, K. (1995/1945). The open society and its enemies (2 volumes). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Post, J. E., & Altman, B. W. (1992). Models of corporate greening: How corporate social policy and organisational learning inform leading-edge environmental management. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 13, 3–29.Google Scholar
  109. Punch, M. (1996). Dirty business. Exploring corporate misconduct. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  110. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  111. Reynolds, S. J. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Reynolds, S. J., Leavitt, K., & Decelles, K. A. (2010). Automatic ethics: The effects of implicit assumptions and contextual cues on moral behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology;, 95(4), 752–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychologica, 127, 258–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Ring, P. S., & Rands, G. P. (1989). Sensemaking, understanding, and committing: Emergent interpersonal transaction processes in the evolution of 3M’s microgravity research program. In H. Van den Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies (pp. 337–366). New York: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  115. Rorty, R. (1991). The priority of democracy to philosophy. In R. Rorty (Ed.), Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. I, pp. 175–196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2004). Winning decisions: Getting it right the first time. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  117. Saenz-Arroyo, A., Roberts, C. M., Torre, J., Carino-Olvera, M., & Enriuez-Andrade, R. R. (2005). Rapidly shifting environmental baselines among fishers of the Gulf of California. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1957–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Said, E. W. (1994/1978). Orientalism (25th anniversary edition). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  119. Schoemaker, P. J. H., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Managing frames to make better decisions. In S. Hoch & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Wharton on making decisions (pp. 131–155). Ort: Wiley.Google Scholar
  120. Sharp-Paine, L. (1997). Cases in leadership, ethics, and organizational integrity. A strategic perspective. Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
  121. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.Google Scholar
  122. Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10, 724–736.Google Scholar
  124. Sonenshein, S. (2006). Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1158–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Steffy, B. D., & Grimes, A. J. (1986). A critical theory of organization science. Academy of Management Review, 11, 322–336.Google Scholar
  128. Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organization (NGOs)in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., & Green, M. C. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175–190). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  134. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  135. Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  136. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  139. Vaughan, D. (2005). System effects: On slippery slopes, repeating negative patterns, and learning from mistake? In W. H. Starbuck & M. Farjoun (Eds.), Organization at the limit. Lessons from the Columbia disaster (pp. 41–59). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  140. Von Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34, 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6, 280–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  143. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  144. Weick, K. (1996). Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Weick, K. (2005). Making sense of blurred images: Mindful organizing in mission STS-107. In W. H. Starbuck & M. Farjoun (Eds.), Organization at the limit. Lessons from the Columbia disaster (pp. 159–177). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  146. Welzer, H. (2005). Täter. Wie aus ganz normalen Menschen Massenmörder werden. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
  147. Welzer, H. (2008). Klimakriege. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
  148. Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L. P., Moberg, D., Englehardt, E., Pritchard, M. & Parmar, B. (2011). Social constructivism, mental models, and problems of obedience. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 103–118.Google Scholar
  150. Wheeler, D., Fabig, H., & Boele, R. (2002). Paradoxes and dilemmas for stakeholder responsive firms in the extractive sector: lessons from the case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Zahra, S. A., & Couples, S. S. (1993). Blind spots in competitive analysis. Academy of Management Executive, 7, 7–28.Google Scholar
  152. Zajac, E. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perception for strategic decisions. Academy of Management Review, 16, 37–56.Google Scholar
  153. Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect. Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Palazzo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Franciska Krings
    • 1
  • Ulrich Hoffrage
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations