Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp 309–321 | Cite as

Factors that Drive Chinese Listed Companies in Voluntary Disclosure of Environmental Information

  • S. X. ZengEmail author
  • X. D. Xu
  • H. T. Yin
  • C. M. Tam


Based on the institutional theory, this article attempts to examine two consecutive questions regarding the impact of various factors on corporate decision in environmental information disclosure (EID): (1) whether or not to disclose; and (2) the level of disclosure. The relevance of these factors is empirically tested using data collected from publicly listed manufacturing companies from 2006 to 2008 in China. Some interesting findings appear. We find that firms that are state-owned, those that operate in environmentally sensitive industries, those having more industrial peers engaged in EID, and those with better reputation are more likely to disclose environmental information. When it comes to the content of EID, variables that attempt to capture external institutional pressures exhibit either no or weak explanatory power. Only the variable of organizational image and reputation is demonstrated to have a significant impact on both the act and the content of EID. This study provides a snapshot of the dialogues between constituencies in the organizational field and EID development.


Environmental information disclosure Listed firms Environmental management China 



We would like to thank two anonymous referees for very helpful suggestions that substantially improved this article. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71025006) and the Ministry of Education of China (20090073110029).


  1. Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 643–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerue, R., & Wang, N. (2008). Agency conflicts, investment, and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 63(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanco, E., Rey-Maquieira, J., & Lozano, J. (2009). The economic impacts of voluntary environmental performance of firms: a critical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(3), 462–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boiral, O. (2003). ISO 9000, outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14(6), 720–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth? Organization Science, 18(1), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7/8), 1168–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7/8), 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4/5), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2007). The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors’ valuation of a firm’s earnings: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 62(3/4), 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coulson, A. B. (2007). How should banks govern the environment? Challenging the construction of action versus veto. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(3), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Criado-Jimenez, I., Fernandez-Chulian, M., Larrinage-Gonzalez, C., & Husillos-Carques, F. J. (2008). Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements: The case of Spain (2001–2003). Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CSMAR. (2009). China Accounting and Finance Research Center of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the Shenzhen GTI Financial Information Limited.Google Scholar
  15. Dasgupta, S., Hong, J. H., Laplante, B., & Mamingi, N. (2006). Disclosure of environmental violations and stock market in the Republic of Korea. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delmas, M. A. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35(1), 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diao, X. D., Zeng, S. X., Tam, C. M., & Tam, Vivian W. Y. (2009). EKC analysis for studying economic growth and environmental quality: a case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(5), 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, M. F., Gilpatric, S. M., & Liu, L. R. (2009). Regulation with direct benefits of information disclosure and imperfect monitoring. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(3), 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. (2007). The marketization index in China. Beijing: Economy Science Press.Google Scholar
  23. Graddy, D. B., & Strickland, T. H. (2007). Public information as a deterrent to environmental infractions. Applied Economics, 39(13), 1961–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray, R. H., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(3/4), 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.Google Scholar
  27. Guler, I., Guillén, M. F., & Macpherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: the international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo, P. Y. (2005). Corporate Environmental Reporting and Disclosure in China,
  29. Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under scrutiny: information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hasseldine, J., Salama, A. I., & Toms, J. S. (2005). Quantity versus quality: the impact of environmental disclosure on the reputations of UK Plcs. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and capital markets: A review of empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1/3), 405–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill, C., & Jones, G. (2008). Essentials of strategic management. USA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  34. Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoffman, A. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses. Organization & Environment, 14(2), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang, C. L., & Kung, F. H. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnstone, N., & Labonne, J. (2009). Why do manufacturing facilities introduce environmental management systems? Improving and/or signaling performance. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jose, A., & Lee, S. M. (2007). Environmental reporting of global corporations: A content analysis based on website disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. C. (2009). Institutionalization, framing and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 897–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. (2005). The strategic use of decentralized institutions: exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1091–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kleindorfer, P. R., & Orts, E. W. (1998). Information regulation of environmental risks. Risk Analysis, 18(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee, K. W. (2007). Corporate voluntary disclosure and the separation of cash flow rights from control rights. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(4), 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li, F. G., Xiong, B., & Xu, B. (2008). Improving public access to environmental information in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1649–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu, X. B., & Anbumozhi, V. (2009). Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 653–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ozen, S., & Kusku, F. (2009). Corporate environmental citizenship variation in developing countries: An institutional framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Patten, D. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Patten, D. M., & Trompeter, G. (2003). Corporate responses to political costs: an examination of the relation between environmental disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qu, W., & Leung, P. (2006). Cultural impact on Chinese corporate disclosure-a corporate governance perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(3), 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scheid-Cook, T. (1992). Organizational enactments and conformity to environmental prescriptions. Human Relations, 45(6), 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Scott, W. R. (2007). Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program. In Smith Ken G. & Hitt Michael A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: the process of theory development (pp. 460–484). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Solomon, J. F., & Solomon, A. (2006). Private social, ethical and environmental disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 564–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walden, W. D., & Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang, H., Bi, J., Wheeler, D., Wang, J. N., Cao, D., Lu, G. F., et al. (2004). Environmental performance rating and disclosure: China’s GreenWatch program. Journal of Environmental Management, 71(2), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity nd its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business and Society, 41(4), 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosure mode in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational fields: past, present and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  61. Xiao, H. (2006). Corporate environmental accounting and reporting in china: current status and the future. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M. and Burritt, R. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, 457–471.Google Scholar
  62. Yin, H. T., & Ma, C. (2009). International Integration: A Hope for a Greener China? International Marketing Review, 26(3), 348–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yin, H. T., & Schmeidler, P. (2009). Why Do Standardized ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Lead to Heterogeneous Environmental Outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(7), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zeng, S. X., Liu, H. C., Tam, C. M., & Shao, Y. K. (2008). Cluster analysis for studying industrial sustainability: an empirical study in Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(10), 1090–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zeng, S. X., Meng, X. H., Yin, H. T., Tam, C. M., & Sun, L. (2010). Impact of cleaner production on business performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10/11), 975–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zeng, S. X., Tam, C. M., Vivian, W. Y., & Deng, Z. M. (2005). Towards implementation of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in selected industries in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., Tam, C. M., & Wan, T. W. (2009). Relationships between business factors and performance in internationalization: An empirical study in China. Management Decision, 47(2), 308–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. X. Zeng
    • 1
    Email author
  • X. D. Xu
    • 1
  • H. T. Yin
    • 1
  • C. M. Tam
    • 2
  1. 1.Antai School of ManagementShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.College of Science and EngineeringCity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations