Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 109, Issue 2, pp 203–208 | Cite as

The Sacred/Secular Divide and the Christian Worldview

Article

Abstract

Many employees with strong religious convictions find themselves living in two separate worlds: the sacred private world of family and church where they can express their faith freely and the secular public world where religious expression is strongly discouraged. We examine the origins of sacred/secular divide, and show how this division is an outcome of modernism replacing Christianity as the dominant worldview in western society. Next, we make the case that guiding assumptions (or faith) is inherent in every worldview, system of thought, or religion and also show that scientific reason can never be a comprehensive or totalizing meaning system, particularly in the realm of ethics. The underlying assumptions of the sacred/secular divide are seriously questioned which has implications for employees who desire to integrate faith and career. Finally, we offer possibilities for individuals and corporate entities to integrate the personal and sacred with the institutional and secular.

Keywords

Sacred/secular Christianity Religion Modernism Reason Faith Worldview 

References

  1. Ariely, D. (2010). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. (1977). Facing up to modernity: Excursions in society, politics, and religion. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calkins, M. (2000). Recovering religion’s prophetic voice for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chase, K. R. (2004). Christian perspectives on business ethics: Faith, profit, and decision-making. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 23(4), 3–12.Google Scholar
  7. Colson, C. W., & Pearcey, N. R. (1999). How now shall we live? Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Daniels, D., Franz, R. S., & Wong, K. (2000). A classroom with a worldview: Making spiritual assumptions explicit in management education. Journal of Management Education, 24(5), 540–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1922). Reconstruction in philosophy. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5, 6), 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fort, T. L. (1996). Religious belief, corporate leadership, and business ethics. American Business Law Journal, 33(3), 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (2010). An awareness of what is missing: Faith and reason in a post-secular age. New York, NY: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  15. James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. New York, NY: Longmans, Green & Company.Google Scholar
  16. Kant, I. 1871/2008. The critique of pure reason, trans. Marcus Weigelt and Max Muller, (Penguin Classics: New York, NY).Google Scholar
  17. Kaufmann, S. A. (2010). Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science reason and religion. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, D., Fisher, D., & McCalman, D. (2009). Modernism, Christianity, and business ethics: A worldview perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mattox, R. (1978). The Christian employee. South Plainfield, NJ: Bridge Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Nash, L. (1994). Believers in business: Resolving the tension between Christian faith, business ethics, competition and our definitions of success. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
  23. Peabody, L. (1974). Secular work is full-time service. Fort Washington, PA: Christian Literature Crusade.Google Scholar
  24. Pearcey, N. R. (2004). Total truth: Liberating Christianity from its cultural captivity. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.Google Scholar
  25. Rossouw, G. J. (1994). Business ethics: Where have all the Christians gone? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryken, L. (1986). Worldly saints. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.Google Scholar
  27. Schaeffer, F. A. (1982). Escape from reason, in the complete works of Francis A. Schaeffer (Vol. 1). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.Google Scholar
  28. Sire, J. (1997). The universe next door: A basic worldview catalog. Dowers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Starke, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Swatos, W. H., Jr., & Christiano, K. J. (1999). Secularization theory: The course of a concept. Sociology of Religion, 60, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Veith, G. E. (1994). Postmodern times: A Christian guide to contemporary thought and culture. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.Google Scholar
  32. Walsh, B., & Middleton, J. (1984). The transforming vision. Dowers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Yaman, H. R. (2003). Skinner’s naturalism as a paradigm for teaching business ethics: A discussion from tourism. Teaching Business Ethics, 7(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Central ArkansasConwayUSA

Personalised recommendations