Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 108, Issue 2, pp 215–227

Illegal Downloading, Ethical Concern, and Illegal Behavior

  • Kirsten Robertson
  • Lisa McNeill
  • James Green
  • Claire Roberts
Article

Abstract

Illegally downloading music through peer-to-peer networks has persisted in spite of legal action to deter the behavior. This study examines the individual characteristics of downloaders which could explain why they are not dissuaded by messages that downloading is illegal. We compared downloaders to non-downloaders and examined whether downloaders were characterized by less ethical concern, engagement in illegal behavior, and a propensity toward stealing a CD from a music store under varying levels of risk. We also examined whether downloading or individual characteristics of downloaders were similar for men and women. Findings revealed downloading was prevalent (74.5% of the student sample downloaded), men and women were equally likely to download and the factors characterizing downloading were similar for men and women. The comparison between downloaders and non-downloaders revealed downloaders were less concerned with the law, demonstrated by less ethical concern and engagement in other illegal behaviors. Downloaders were also more likely to indicate that they would steal a CD when there was no risk of being caught. Given these results, messages regarding illegality are unlikely to perturb downloaders and alternative recommendations are offered for targeting illegal downloading.

Keywords

Risky behavior and illegal downloading Music piracy Stealing a CD and illegal downloading Students’ illegal downloading 

Abbreviations

TRA

Theory of reasoned action

TPB

Theory of planned behavior

PBC

Perceived behavioral control

RIPS

Risk involvement perception scale

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to behavior: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. (1986). Perceived goal directed behavior: Attitudes, dimensions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Rafee, S., & Cronan, T. P. (2006). Digital piracy: Factors that influence attitude toward behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altschuller, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2009). Is music downloading the new prohibition? What students reveal through an ethical dilemma. Ethics in Information Technology, 11, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ang, S. H., Cheng, P. S., Lim, E. A. C., & Tambyah, S. K. (2001). Spot the difference: Consumer responses towards counterfeits. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(3), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharjee, S., Gopal, R. D., Marsden, J. R., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2009). Re-tuning the music industry—can they re-attain business resonance? Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 136–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravander, J., & Tuttle, M. (1987). A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), 1825–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, H. K., Sims, R. R., & Teegan, H. (1997). To purchase or to pirate software: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 49–60.Google Scholar
  10. Chiang, E. P., & Assane, D. (2008). Music piracy among students on the university campus: Do males and females react differently? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1371–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiou, J.-S., Huang, C.-Y., & Lee, H.-H. (2005). The antecedents of music piracy: Attitudes and intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen, A. L., & Eining, M. M. (1991). Factors influencing software piracy: Implications for accountants. Journal of Information Systems, 5(1), 67–80.Google Scholar
  13. Coyle, J. R., Gould, S. J., Gupta, P., & Gupta, R. (2009). To buy or to pirate: The matrix of music consumers’ acquisition-mode decision-making. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1031–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cronan, T. P., & Al-Rafee, S. (2008). Factors that influence the intention to pirate software and media. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 527–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cronan, T. P., & Douglas, D. E. (2005). Information technology ethical behavior: Toward a comprehensive ethical behavior model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(1), i–xi.Google Scholar
  16. d’Astous, A., Colbert, F., & Montpetit, D. (2005). Music piracy on the web—how effective are anti-piracy arguments? Evidence from the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easley, R. F. (2005). Ethical issues in the music industry: Response to innovation and piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  19. Freestone, O., & Mitchell, V. W. (2004). Generation Y attitudes towards e-ethics and internet-related misbehaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glass, R. S., & Wood, W. A. (1996). Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1189–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goles, T., Jayatilaka, B., George, B., Parsons, L., Chambers, V., Taylor, D., et al. (2008). Softlifting: Exploring determinants of attitude. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill, C. W. L. (2007). Digital piracy: Causes, consequences, and strategic responses. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2006). The Recording Industry 2006 Piracy Report. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from http://www.ifpi.org/content/section_resources/piracy-report-current.html.
  25. Johnston, K., & Johal, P. (1999). The internet as a virtual cultural region: Are extant cultural classification schemes appropriate? Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 9, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy, J. (2009). Digital Music Report: 2009, Changing Business Models for a Changing Environment, International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. Retrieved December 11, 2009, from http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/DMR2009.pdf.
  27. Knopper, S., (2005, June 9). RIAA will keep on suing. Rolling Stone.Google Scholar
  28. Knopper, S., (2007, April 5) RIAA’s campus crackdown. Rolling Stone.Google Scholar
  29. Kreie, J., & Cronan, T. P. (1998). How men and women view ethics. Communications of the ACM, 41(9), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leonard, L. N. K., & Cronan, T. P. (2001). Illegal, inappropriate, and unethical behavior in an information technology context: A study to explain influences. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(12), 1–31.Google Scholar
  31. Levin, A. M., Dato-on, M. C., & Rhee, K. (2004) Money for nothing and hits for free: The ethics of downloading music from peer-to-peer web sites. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Winter 12(1), 48–60.Google Scholar
  32. Levin, A. M., Dato-on, M. C., & Manolis, C. (2007). Deterring illegal downloading: The effects of threat appeals, past behavior, subjective norms, and attributions of harm. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liao, C., Lin, H.-N., & Liu, Y.-P. (2010). Predicting the use of pirated software: A contingency model integrating perceived risk with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lysonski, S., & Durvasula, S. (2008). Digital piracy of MP3s: Consumer and ethical predispositions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(3), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Odell, P. M., Korgen, K. O., Schumacher, P., & Delucchi, M. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 855–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peace, A. G., Galletta, D. F., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2003). Software piracy in the workplace: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 153–177.Google Scholar
  38. Ramayah, T., Ahmad, N. H., Chin, L. G., & Lo, M.-C. (2009). Testing a casual model of internet piracy behavior among university students. European Journal of Scientific Research, 29(2), 206–214.Google Scholar
  39. Rob, R., & Waldfogel, J. (2006). Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. Journal of Law and Economics, 49, 29–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robin, D. P., Reidenbach, R. E., & Forrest, P. J. (1996). The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers. Journal of Business Research, 35, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shapiro, R., Siegel, A. W., Scovill, L. C., & Hays, J. (1998). Risk-taking patterns of female adolescents: What they do and why. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siegfried, R. M. (2004). Student attitudes on software piracy and related issues of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sinha, R. K., & Mandel, N. (2008). Preventing digital music piracy: The carrot or the stick? Journal or Marketing, 72, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thong, J. Y. L., & Yap, C.-S. (1998). Testing an ethical decision-making theory: The case of soft lifting. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 213–237.Google Scholar
  45. Tyler, R. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wade, J. (2004). The music industry’s war on piracy. Risk Management, 51, 10–15.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law & Society Review, 20(4), 545–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wingrove, T., Korpas, A. L., & Weisz, V. (2011). Why were millions of people not obeying the law? Motivational influences on non-compliance with the law in the case of music piracy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(3), 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education Behavior, 27, 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirsten Robertson
    • 1
  • Lisa McNeill
    • 1
  • James Green
    • 2
  • Claire Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marketing, School of BusinessUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of PharmacyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations