Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 108, Issue 1, pp 81–100

To Thine Own Self Be True? Employees’ Judgments of the Authenticity of Their Organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility Program



Despite recognizing the importance of developing authentic corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs, noticeably absent from the literature is consideration for how employees distinguish between authentic and inauthentic CSR programs. This is somewhat surprising given that employees are essentially the face of their organization and are largely expected to act as ambassadors for the organization’s CSR program (Collier and Esteban in Bus Ethics 16:19–33, 2007). The current research, by conducting depth interviews with employees, builds a better understanding of how employees differentiate between authentic and inauthentic CSR programs, and how these judgments influence their perceptions of the organization. We find that employees rely on two different referent standards to form authenticity judgments—the extent to which the image put forth in the CSR program aligns with the organization’s true identity and the extent to which the CSR program itself is developmental. To assess the former, employees draw on cues about resource commitment, alignment between elements of the organization’s CSR program, emotional engagement, justice, and embeddedness. The latter assessments are based on the extent to which the organization adopts a leadership role with regards to its CSR initiatives. We also find that perceived authenticity can lead to positive outcomes such as organizational identification and employee connections. This study contributes to the broad literatures on both CSR and authenticity, as well as more specifically adding to the conversation on authenticity as a potentially valuable lens for enriching business ethics theorizing.


Authenticity Corporate social responsibility Employee perceptions Interviews Organizational self Socially constructed standard 


  1. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  2. Beckman, T., Colwell, A., & Cunningham, P. H. (2009). The emergence of corporate social responsibility in Chile: The importance of authenticity and social networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belk, R. W., & Costa, J. A. (1998). The mountain myth: A contemporary consuming fantasy. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 218–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. M., & Drumwright, M. E. (2006). Identity identification and relationship through social alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 34, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, L. L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. L. Berry et al. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives in relationship marketing (pp. 25–34). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  6. Bertels, S., & Peloza, J. (2008). Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beverland, M. (2006). The ‘real thing’: Branding authenticity in the luxury wine trade. Journal of Business Research, 59, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 119–151). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, bad and ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Driver, M. (2006). Beyond the stalemate of economics versus ethics: Corporate social responsibility and the discourse of the organizational self. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drumwright, M. E. (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 1, 143–159.Google Scholar
  18. Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning positions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grayson, K., & Martinec, R. (2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guest, G. A., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Handler, R., & Saxton, W. (1988). Dyssimulation: Reflexivity, narrative, and the quest for authenticity in “living history”. Cultural Anthropology, 3, 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson, K. (2005). Towards authenticity: A Sartrean perspective on business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini, & Co., Inc. (1999). Socrates: The corporate social ratings monitor. Cambridge, MA; Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini, & Co. Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laufer, W. (2003). Social accountability and greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leigh, T. W., Peters, C., & Shelton, J. (2006). The consumer quest for authenticity: The multiplicity of meanings within the mg subculture of consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levanthal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. G. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liedtka, J. (2008). Strategy making and the search for authenticity. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mirvis, P. (1994). Environmentalism in progressive business. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(4), 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12–40.Google Scholar
  32. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peloza, J., & Hassay, D. N. (2006). Intra-organizational volunteerism: Good soldiers, good deeds and good politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pohle, G. & Hittner, J. (2008). Attaining sustainable growth through corporate social responsibility. IBM Global Business Services. Retrieved October 2008 from,
  36. Ramus, C. A. (2002). Encouraging innovative environmental actions: What companies and managers must do. Journal of World Business, 37, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee ‘ecoinitiatives’ at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2007). Do employees care about CSR programs? A typology of employees according to their attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887–910.Google Scholar
  40. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1989). Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.Google Scholar
  49. Wicki, S., & van der Kaaij, J. (2007). Is it true love between the octopus and the frog? How to avoid the authenticity gap. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 312–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zyglidopoulos, Z. C., Georgiadis, A. P., Carroll, C., & Siegel, D. (2009). The evolution of corporate social performance and the role of media visibility. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of ManagementDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations