Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 9–21 | Cite as

Corporations and NGOs: When Accountability Leads to Co-optation

Article

Abstract

Interactions between corporations and nonprofits are on the rise, frequently driven by a corporate interest in establishing credentials for corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this article, we show how increasing demands for accountability directed at both businesses and NGOs can have the unintended effect of compromising the autonomy of nonprofits and fostering their co-optation. Greater scrutiny of NGO spending driven by self-appointed watchdogs of the nonprofit sector and a prevalence of strategic notions of CSR advanced by corporate actors weaken the ability of civil society actors to change the business practices of their partners in the commercial sector. To counter this trend, we argue that corporations should embrace a political notion of CSR and should actively encourage NGOs to strengthen “downward accountability” mechanisms, even if this creates more tensions in corporate–NGO partnerships. Rather than seeing NGOs as tools in a competition for a comparative advantage in the market place, corporations should actively support NGO independence and critical capacity.

Keywords

 NGOs CSR NGO-business partnerships Accountability Co-optation Watchdogs 

References

  1. Ählström, J., & Sjöström, E. (2005). CSOs and business partnerships: Strategies for interaction. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(4), 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arenas, D., Lozano, J. M., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baur, D., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 579-604.Google Scholar
  4. Bebbington, A. (2005). Donor-NGO relations and representations of livelihood in nongovernmental aid chains. World Development, 33(6), 937–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendell, J. (2005). In whose name? The accountability of corporate social responsibility. Development in Practice, 15(3), 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brett, E. A. (1993). Voluntary agencies as development organizations: Theorizing the problem of efficiency and accountability. Development and Change, 24(2), 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government-nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, L. D. (2008). Creating credibility: Legitimacy and accountability for transnational civil society. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruno-van Vijfeijken, T., & Schmitz, H. P. (2008). Accountability without learning: A cross-sectoral analysis of transnational NGOs. Syracuse: Transnational NGO Initiative/Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, D. (2001). Conviction seeking efficacy: Sustainable agriculture and the politics of co-optation. Agriculture and Human Values, 18, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaplowe, S. G., & Engo-Tjega, R. B. (2007). Civil society organizations and evaluation: Lessons from Africa. Evaluation, 13(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, A. M. (1995). Non-governmental organizations and their influence on international society. Journal of International Affairs, 48(2), 507–525.Google Scholar
  15. Collingwood, V., & Logister, L. (2005). State of the art: Addressing the INGO ‘legitimacy deficit’. Political Studies Review, 3(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooke, B. (2003). A new continuity with colonial administration: Participation in development management. Third World Quarterly, 24(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Covey, J. & Brown, L. D. (2001). Critical cooperation: An alternative form of civil society-business engagement. IDR Reports 17 (1).Google Scholar
  18. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2010). Role of nongovernmental organizations in the business—government—society interface. Special issue overview and introductory essay. Business & Society, 49(1), 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deetz, S. (2007). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and communication. In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 267–277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change behavior. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ebrahim, A. (2003a). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ebrahim, A. (2003b). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ebrahim, A. (2010). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. Harvard business school working paper (10-069).Google Scholar
  26. Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor? The myths and realities of philantrocapitalism. New York: DEMOS/Young Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Edwards, M. (2010). Small change. Why business won’t save the world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk. Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  31. Fung, A. (2003). Deliberative democracy and international labor standards. Governance, 16(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gamson, W. A. (1990). The strategy of social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  34. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2), 187–216.Google Scholar
  36. Gray, R., Bebbington, J., & Collison, D. (2006). NGOs, civil society and accountability: Making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hager, M. A., & Flack, T. (2004). The pros and cons of financial efficiency standards. Washington, D.C: Nonprofit Overhead Cost Project/Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Hamann, R., & Acutt, N. (2003). How should civil society (and the government) respond to ‘corporate social responsibility’? A critique of business motivations and the potential for partnerships. Development Southern Africa, 20(2), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holzer, B. (2008). Turning stakeseekers into stakeholders: A political coalition perspective on the politics of stakeholder influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jamison, A. (1996). The shaping of the global environmental agenda: The role of nongovernmental organisations. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity. Towards a new ecology (pp. 224–245). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Jegers, M., & Lapsley, I. (2001). Making sense of non-profit organisations. Financial Accountability and Management, 17(1), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jolly, D. (2010, June 22). Krill Harvest certification upsets conservationists. New York Times.Google Scholar
  43. Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2006). NGO accountability. Politics, principles, innovations. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  44. Kaldor, M., Anheier, H., & Glasius, M. (2003). Global civil society 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kilby, P. (2006). Accountability for empowerment: Dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. World Development, 34(6), 951–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lacy, M. G. (1982). A model of cooptation applied to the political relations of the United States & American Indians. Social Science Journal, 19(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
  48. Lowell, S., Trelstad, B., & Meehan, B. 2005. The ratings game. Evaluating the three groups that rate the Charities. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 39–45.Google Scholar
  49. Lucea, R. (2010). How we see them versus how they see themselves a cognitive perspective of firm—NGO relationships. Business & Society, 49(1), 116–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacDonald, C. (2008). Green, Inc.—an environmental insider reveals how a good cause has gone bad. Guilford CT: The Lyons Press.Google Scholar
  51. Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly (48):268–305.Google Scholar
  52. Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGann, J., & Johnston, M. (2006). The power shift and the NGO credibility crisis. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 8(2), 65–77.Google Scholar
  55. Meier, M. (2008, 22. 7.). Nestlé-Chef sorgt mit Heks-Job für Wirbel. Tages-Anzeiger.Google Scholar
  56. Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (1998). A movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. In D. S. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.), The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century (pp. 1–28). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  57. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  58. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.Google Scholar
  59. Muller, A. & Van Tulder, R. (2006). Partnerships, power and equity in global commodity chains: A ‘rough guide’ to partnerships for development. http://www.agri-profocus.nl/docs/200708281516024001.pdf. Accessed January 5, 2010.
  60. Murphy, D. F., & Bendell, J. (1999). Partners in Time? Business, NGOs and sustainable development. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  61. Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(1), 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neuman, W. (2010, December 15). Save the children breaks with soda tax effort. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  63. Nijhof, A., de Bruijn, T., & Honders, H. (2008). Partnerships for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts and strategic options. Management Decision, 46(1), 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2007). From functional to social accountability. Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 446–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study of Amnesty Ireland. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 801–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ogden, T. 2009. The worst (and best) way to pick a charity this year. Experts explain that overhead ratios and executive salaries are a red herring. http://www.philanthropyaction.com/nc/the_best_way_to_pick_a_charity_this_year/. Accessed March 2010.
  67. Pallotta, D. (2008). Uncharitable. How restraints on nonprofits undermine their potential. Boston: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people’s movements. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  69. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  70. Robinson, M., & White, G. (1997). The role of civic organizations in the provision of social services. Helsinki: United Nations University.Google Scholar
  71. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility—business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.Google Scholar
  73. Schmitz, H. P., & Mitchell, G. (2009). Bracing for Impact. Monday Developments, 27(4), 20–22.Google Scholar
  74. Schmitz, H. P., Raggo, P., & Bruno-van Vijfeijken, T. (2010). New standards, old habits: Transnational NGO leaders’ perspectives on the what for, to whom, and how of being accountable. Syracuse: Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs.Google Scholar
  75. Scholte, J. A. (2004). Civil society and democratically accountable global governance. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seitanidi, M. M. (2010). The politics of partnerships. A critical examination of nonprofit-business partnerships. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Servos, C. M., & Marcuello, C. (2007). NGOs, corporate social responsibility, and social accountability: Inditex vs. clean clothes. Development in Practice, 17(3), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shamir, R. (2004). The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology (Brill Academic Publishers), 30(3), 669–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Slim, H. (2002). By what authority? The legitimacy and accountability of NGOs. The International Council on Human Rights Policy international meeting on ‘global trends and human rights—Before and after September 11’, Geneva; January 10–12, 2002.Google Scholar
  81. Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Countervailing market responses to corporate co-optation and the ideological recruitment of consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Trumpy, A. J. (2008). Subject to negotiation: The mechanisms behind co-optation and corporate reform. Social Problems, 55(4), 480–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ulrich, P. (2008). Integrative economic ethics. Foundations of a civilized market economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Uphoff, N. T. (1996). Why NGOs are not a third sector: A sectoral analysis with some thoughts on accountability, sustainability and evaluation. In M. Edwards & D. Hulme (Eds.), Beyond the magic bullet: NGO performance and accountability in the post-cold war world (pp. 23–39). West Hartford: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  85. Utting, P. (2005). Corporate responsibility and the movement of business. Development in Practice, 15(3 & 4), 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vachani, S., Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2009). NGOs’ influence on MNEs’ social development strategies in varying institutional contexts: A transaction cost perspective. International Business Review, 18(5), 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Valente, M., & Crane, A. (2010). Public responsibility and private enterprise in developing countries. California Management Review, 52(3), 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Walsh, J. P., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. D. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29, 859–881.Google Scholar
  89. Wettstein, F. (2009). Multinational corporations and global justice. Human rights obligations of a quasi-governmental institution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Whole Foods Magazine Staff. (2010). Whole foods says no to krill oil sales, Aker confirms MSC certification. http://www.wholefoodsmagazineonline.com/news/green-news/whole-foods-says-no-krill-oil-sales-aker-confirms-msc-certification. Accessed December 26, 2010.
  91. Willetts, P. (2002). What is a non-governmental organization? In UNESCO (Ed.), Encyclopedia of life support systems. Oxford: Eolss Publishers.Google Scholar
  92. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wing, K., & Hager, M. A. (2004). Getting what we pay for. Low overhead limits nonprofit effectiveness. Washington, DC: Nonprofit Overhead Cost Project/Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  94. Yaziji, M., & Doh, J. P. (2009). NGOs and corporations: Conflict and collaboration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zadek, S. (2003, September). In defense of non-profit accountability. Ethical Corporation Magazine, 34–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Business EthicsUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Moynihan Institute of Global AffairsMaxwell School of Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations