Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 98, Supplement 1, pp 101–113 | Cite as

Exploring the Interface Between Strategy-Making and Responsible Leadership

Article

Abstract

This article explores strategy-making modes within organisations. The implications of certain strategy-making modes for the responsible leader as an architect or change agent are highlighted. The study on which this article is based, showed that the use of emergent strategy-making is as prevalent as the use of deliberate strategy-making. This article reports on the thinking of organisational leaders, managers and non-managers regarding strategy-making processes and records empirical findings from mixed method research. It was found that emergent strategy-making is associated with quick response and adaptation to environmental changes, more autonomous decisions and actions, less control and higher intangibility whereas the deliberate strategy is known for its clear objectives, articulated vision and direction and specific ends and means. It is recommended that organisational leaders should take cognisance of the growing use of emergent strategy-making as well as its characteristics in facilitating effective governance. A knowledge and understanding of these characteristics of strategy-making modes should be sought to serve as guideline for organisational leaders who want to be responsive and responsible in all their actions areas for future research.

Keywords

Responsible leadership Corporate governance Strategy-making modes Deliberate strategy Emergent strategy 

References

  1. Andersen, T. J. (2000). Strategic planning, autonomous actions and corporate performance. Long Range Planning, 33, 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, T. J., & Nielsen, B. B. (2009). Adaptive strategy making: The effects of emergent and intended strategy modes. European Management Review, 6, 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, K. R. (1981). Replaying the board’s role in formulating strategy, Harvard Business review, May–June, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
  4. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Ansoff, H. I. (1991). Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘The Design School: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic planning’. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balogun, J., Huff, A. S., & Johnson, P. (2003). Three responses to the methodological challenges of studying strategizing. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boisot, M. H. (Ed.). (1995). Information space: A framework for learning in organizations, institutions and culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd, B. K. (1991). Strategic planning and financial performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management Studies, 28, 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brews, P. J., & Hunt, M. R. (1999). Learning to plan and planning to learn: Resolving the planning school/learning school debate. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 889–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 61–70.Google Scholar
  11. Burgelman, R. A. (1988). Strategy making as a social learning process: The case of internal corporate venturing. Interfaces, 18, 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgelman, R. A. (1996). A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure. Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business Research Methods (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  15. Dane, F. C. (1990). Research methods. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, J. (1984). The competitiveness of strategic decision processes: extension, observations, future directions. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamel, G. (1996). Strategy as revolution. Harvard Business Review, Jul/Aug, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
  18. Harrington, R. J., Lemak, D. J., Reed, R., & Kendall, K. W. (2004). A question of fit: The links among environment, strategy formulation, and performance. Journal of Business and Management, 10(1), 15–38.Google Scholar
  19. Heracleous, L. (1998). Strategic thinking or strategic planning? Long Range Planning, 31(3), 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Huber, George. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15, 47–71.Google Scholar
  22. Idenburg, P. J. (1993). Four styles of strategy development. Long range planning, 26(6), 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inkpen, A., & Choudhury, N. (1995). The seeking of strategy where it is not: Toward a theory of strategy absence. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Institute of Directors (IoD). (2002). Second King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa. Bedfordview: Institute of Directors in Southern Africa.Google Scholar
  25. Institute of Directors (IoD). (2009). Third King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa. Bedfordview: Institute of Directors in Southern Africa.Google Scholar
  26. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2004). Enterprise Governance: Getting the Balance Right. www.ifac.org. Accessed March 29, 2010.
  27. Janczak, S. (2005). The strategic decision-making process in organisations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 3, 58–70.Google Scholar
  28. Julian, S. D., & Ofori-Dankwa, J. C. (2008). Toward an integrative cartography of two strategic issues diagnosis frameworks. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 91–114.Google Scholar
  29. Knights, D., & Mueller, F. (2004). Strategy as a ‘project’: overcoming dualisms in the strategy debate. European Management Review, 1, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research – planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mintzberg, H. (1987). Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(4), 66–75.Google Scholar
  34. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. New York: The Free Press (Macmillan).Google Scholar
  36. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: The complete guide through the wilds of strategic management. London: FT Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formulation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 160–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mintzberg, H., Quinn, J. B., & Ghoshal, S. (1995). The strategy process. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1985). Of strategies deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (2001). Corporate governance (2nd ed.). Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 935–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parnell, J. A. (2000). Reframing the combination strategy debate: Defining forms of combination. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 9(1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the organization. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91.Google Scholar
  44. Quinn, J. B. (1980). Managing Strategic Change. Sloan Management Review, Summer, 3–20.Google Scholar
  45. Rossouw, G. J., & Van Vuuren, L. (2007). Business ethics (3rd ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  47. Schendel, D. E., & Hofer, C. W. (1979). Strategic management: A new view of business policy and planning. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  48. Steiner, G. A. (1979). Strategic planning: What every manager must know. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Volberda, H. W. (2004). Crisis in strategy: Fragmentation, integration or synthesis. European Management Review, 1, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whittington, R. (2004). Strategy after modernism: Recovering practice. European Management Review, 1, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson, D. C., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Thinking and acting strategically: New challenges for interrogating strategy. European Management Review, 1, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1994). Dinosaurs or dynamos? Recognizing middle management’s strategic role. Academy of Management Executive, 8(4), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Management, Faculty of Economic and Management SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Auditing, Faculty of Economic and Management SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations