Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 98, Supplement 1, pp 15–23 | Cite as

Values, Authenticity, and Responsible Leadership

Article

Abstract

The recent financial crisis has prompted questioning of our basic ideas about capitalism and the role of business in society. As scholars are calling for “responsible leadership” to become more of the norm, organizations are being pushed to enact new values, such as “responsibility” and “sustainability,” and pay more attention to the effects of their actions on their stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to open up a line of research in business ethics on the concept of “authenticity” as it can be applied in modern organizational life and more specifically to think through some of the foundational questions about the logic of values. We shall argue that the idea of simply “acting on one’s values” or “being true to oneself” is at best a starting point for thinking about authenticity. We develop the idea of the poetic self as a project of seeking to live authentically. We see being authentic as an ongoing process of conversation that not only starts with perceived values but also involves one’s history, relationships with others, and aspirations. Authenticity entails acting on these values for individuals and organizations and thus also becomes a necessary starting point for ethics. After all, if there is no motivation to justify one’s actions either to oneself or to others, then as Sartre has suggested, morality simply does not come into play. We argue that the idea of responsible leadership can be enriched with this more nuanced idea of the self and authenticity.

Keywords

Authenticity Ethical theory Poetic self Responsible leadership Values 

References

  1. Agle, B. R., & Caldwell, C. B. (1999). Understanding research on values in business. Business and Society, 38, 326–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, J. (1988). The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, H. (1997). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Frankena, W. K. (1958). Obligation and motivation in recent moral philosophy. In A. I. Melden (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 40–81). University of Washington Press: Seattle.Google Scholar
  6. Frederick, W. C. (1995). Values, nature and culture in the American Corporation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. George, B., & Sims, P. (2007). True North: Discover your authentic leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gilmore, J. H., & Pine II, B. J. (2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hartman, E. M. (1988). Conceptual foundations of organization theory. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  12. Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Jackson, K. T. (2005). Towards authenticity: A Sartrean perspective on business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jordan, J. V., Hartling, L. M., & Walker, M. (2004). The complexities of connection. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kets de Vries, M. (2006). The Leader on the couch: A clinical approach to changing people and organizations (pp. 9–11). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in the development of moral thought and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  18. Kohut, H. (1996). In P. Tolpin & M. Tolpin (Eds.), The Chicago Institute lectures. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (Eds.). (2006a). Responsible leadership. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006b). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milgram, Stanley. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority; An experimental view. New York: Harpercollins.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  24. Painter-Morland, M. (2008). Business ethics as practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers, C. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social context. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rorty, R. (1991). Freud and moral reflection. In: Essays on Heidegger and others. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siegel, A. M., & Kohut, H. (2000). The psychology of the self. London: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Simpson, E. (1999). Between internalism and externalism in ethics. Philosophical Quarterly, 49(195), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stolorow, R. D., Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. E. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Werhane, P. H. (1999). Moral imagination and management decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Darden School of BusinessUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations