Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 98, Supplement 1, pp 85–100 | Cite as

Responsible Leadership Helps Retain Talent in India

  • Jonathan P. Doh
  • Stephen A. Stumpf
  • Walter G. TymonJr.


The role of responsible leadership—for each leader and as part of a leader’s collective actions—is essential to global competitive success (Doh and Stumpf, Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business, 2005; Maak and Pless, Responsible leadership, 2006a. Failures in leadership have stimulated interest in understanding “responsible leadership” by researchers and practitioners. Research on responsible leadership draws on stakeholder theory, with employees viewed as a primary stakeholder for the responsible organization (Donaldson and Preston, Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91, 1995; Freeman, Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, 1984; Mitchell et al., Acad Manag Rev 22:853–886, 1997; Phillips and Freeman, Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics, 2003. We define and operationalize responsible leadership from the perspective of employees and their views of the actions of their leaders. Drawing on a comprehensive survey of 28 Indian and global organizations operating in India, we report the results from 4,352 employees on the relationship between responsible leadership, their pride in and satisfaction with their organization, and retention 1 year later. Strong associations were found among these variables suggesting that responsible leadership—employee perceptions of the support they receive from managers, the HR practices, and corporate socially responsible actions—may be an overarching construct that connects them to the organization.


Responsible leadership Pride in the organization Satisfaction with the organization Social responsibility Stakeholder culture Employee retention Turnover 


  1. Albinger, H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avery, G., & Baker, E. (1990). Psychology at work. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. L., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Beyond corporate reputation: Managing reputational interdependence. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention. Employee Relations, 29, 640–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37–44.Google Scholar
  10. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bromley, D. B. (2001). Relationships between personal and corporate reputations. European Journal of Marketing, 35, 316–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budhwar, P., & Debrah, Y. A. (2009). Future research on human resource management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cascio, W. (2000). Costing human resources (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 29, 341–358.Google Scholar
  16. Coldwell, D. A., Billsberry, J., van Meurs, N., & Marsh, P. J. G. (2008). The effects of person-organization ethical fit on employee attraction and retention: Towards a testable explanatory model. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 740–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corporate Executive Board. (2006). Attracting and retaining critical talent segments: Identifying drivers of attraction and commitment in the global labor market. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board.Google Scholar
  20. Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. S. (2008). The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Devanna, M. A., Fombrum, C., Tichy, N., & Warren, L. (1982). Strategic planning and human resource management. Human Resource Management, 21, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doh, J. P., & Stumpf, S. A. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business. Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  26. Ferris, G. R., Arthur, M. M., Berkson, H. M., Kaplan, D. M., Harrell-Cook, G., & Frink, D. D. (1998). Toward a social context theory of human resource management-organizational effectiveness relationship. Human Resource Management Review, 8, 235–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  28. Gomez, C., & Rosen, B. (2001). The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group and Organization Management, 26, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gong, Y., & Chang, S. (2008). Institutional antecedents and performance consequences of employment security and career advancement practices: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China. Human Resources Management, 47, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guthridge, M., Komm, A. B., & Lawson, E. (2008). Making talent a strategic priority. McKinsey Quarterly Issue, 1, 48–59.Google Scholar
  31. Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hom, P. W., & Kinicki, A. J. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of how dissatisfaction drives employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 975–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (1999). The effects of human resource management practices on economic performance: An international comparison of US and Japanese plants. Management Science, 45, 704–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knowledge@Wharton. (2008). India’s corporations race to train workers and avoid being left in the dust. Retrieved September 18, 2008, from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn/india.
  36. Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19, 699–727.Google Scholar
  37. Love, E. G., & Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing affected corporate reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 314–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luthans, F., Zhu, W., & Avolio, B. J. (2006). The impact of efficacy on work attitudes across cultures. Journal of World Business, 41, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (Eds.). (2006a). Responsible leadership. London, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006b). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society. A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malkani, D., Pandey, J., & Bhagwati, A. B. (2007). The high-performance workforce study 2007: India. Mumbai: Accenture.Google Scholar
  43. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ngo, H.-Y., Lau, C.-M., & Foley, S. (2008). Strategic human resource management, firm performance, and employee relations climate in China. Human Resources Management, 47, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., et al. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Phillips, R. R, & Freeman, E. (2003). Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  51. Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Raven, B. H., & Rubin, J. E. (1976). Social psychology: People in groups. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Ready, D. A., Hill, L. A., & Conger, J. A. (2008). Winning the race for talent in emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 86(11), 62–70.Google Scholar
  54. Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., & Bill, J. B. (1997). Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schuler, R. S., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Strategic human resource management: A reader. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Singh, K. (2004). Impact of HR practices on perceived performance in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 42, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sparrow, P. R., & Budhwar, P. S. (1997). Competition and change: Mapping the Indian HRM recipe against world-wide patterns. Journal of World Business, 32, 224–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stumpf, S. A., Doh, J. P., & Tymon, W. (2009). Capitalizing on human resource management in India: The link between HR practices and employee performance. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 351–373.Google Scholar
  61. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tymon, W., Stumpf, S. A., Doh, J. P. (2010). Exploring talent management in India: The neglected role of intrinsic rewards. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 109–121.Google Scholar
  63. Valentine, S., & Fleishman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan P. Doh
    • 1
  • Stephen A. Stumpf
    • 2
  • Walter G. TymonJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Global LeadershipVillanova School of Business, Villanova UniversityVillanovaUSA
  2. 2.Villanova School of BusinessVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA

Personalised recommendations