Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 106, Issue 4, pp 519–524

The Cost of Being Female: Critical Comment on Block



Women currently earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by men. Explanations abound for why, exactly, this wage gap exists. One of the more potent justifications attributes this pay differential to the unequal effects of marriage on the sexes: the marital asymmetry hypothesis. However, even when marital status is accounted for, a small but significant residual gap remains. This article argues that this is the result of social factors. Entrenched societal sexism causes all of us to harbor unconscious bias about the capabilities and proper gender roles of women. This bias, in turn, leads us to discount work completed by females, especially in professional environments. Employers are not immune from this effect, and the undervaluation of female ability affects hiring practices, leading to the residual wage gap.


Feminism Discrimination Pay gap Wage differentials Sexism Marital asymmetry 


  1. Bakalar, N. (2009, June 22). Perceptions: A customer bias in favor of white men. The New York Times.
  2. Becker, G. (1957). The economics of discrimination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benbow, C., & Stanley, J. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262–1264. Google Scholar
  4. Benbow, C., & Stanley, J. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning: A longitudinal perspective. American Education Research, 19, 598–622.Google Scholar
  5. Benbow, C., & Stanley, J. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.Google Scholar
  6. Benbow, C., & Stanley, J. (1984). Gender and the science major: A study of mathematically precocious youth. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2, 165–195.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, J., & Ellison, J. (2010, April 20). Tracking the wage gap. Newsweek.
  8. Block, W. (1982). Economic intervention, discrimination and unforeseen consequences. In W. Block & M. A. Walker (Eds.), Discrimination, affirmative action and equal opportunity (pp. 101–125). Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Block, W. (1985). Directions for future research in equal pay legislation. In M. Armstrong (Ed.), Towards Equity: Proceedings of a Colloquium on the Economic Status of Women in the Labour Market (pp. 119–121, 134–135, 179–182). Ottawa: The Economic Council.Google Scholar
  10. Block, W. (1989). Debunking the mythical gap. North York, ON: The Financial Post.Google Scholar
  11. Block, Walter. (1992). Discrimination: An interdisciplinary analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Block, W. (1998). Compromising the uncompromisable: Discrimination. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57(2), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Block, W. (2002, June 6). Take our daughters to work day.
  14. Block, W. (2008, November 18). A (not so) funny thing happened to me in Baltimore.
  15. Block, W., & Walker, M. A. (1985). Focus on employment equity: A critique of the Abella royal commission on equality in employment. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Block, W., & Williams, W. (1981). Male–female earnings differentials: A critical reappraisal. Journal of Labor Research, 2(2), 385–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Block, W., Snow, N., & Stringham, E. (2008). Banks, insurance companies and discrimination. Business and Society Review, 113(3), 403–419.;
  18. Carman, D. (2007, April 24). Why do men earn more? Just because. The Denver Post.
  19. Clark-Flory, T. (2007, April 23). Women earn less than men a year out of college.
  20. Clark-Flory, T. (2010, September 1). Have young women reversed the pay gap?
  21. Dougherty, C. (2010, September 1). Young women’s pay exceeds male peers’. The Wall Street Journal.
  22. Drache, A. (1989). On pay equity: Making the numbers say what you want. North York, ON: The Financial Post.Google Scholar
  23. Gottfredson, L. S. (1986). Societal consequences of the g factor in employment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grossman, J. L. (2009, February 13). The Lilly Ledbetter fair pay act of 2009: President Obama’s first signed bill restores essential protection against pay discrimination. FindLaw.
  25. Levin, M. (1987). Feminism and freedom. New York: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  26. Ludden, J. (2010, April 19). Despite new law, gender salary gap persists. NPR.
  27. Mercer, I. (2005, January 6). The silly sex.
  28. Ragan, T., & Block, W. (2003, April). Letter: ‘Wage gap’ due to differentiation among sexes’ roles. Editorial. The Maroon, Loyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, LA.
  29. Stark, B. (2010, February 18). The myth of the pipeline: inequality still plagues working women, study finds. ABC News/Money.
  30. The Wage Gap by Gender and Race. (2007). Infoplease.
  31. Varian, H. R. (2004, July 29). Analyzing the marriage gap. The New York Times.
  32. Vedantam, S. (2010, February 18). The wage gap—Unconscious bias in judging the value of predominantly ‘female’ professions. Psychology Today.
  33. Walker, D., Dauterive, J. W., Schultz, E., & Block, W. (2004). The feminist competition/cooperation dichotomy: A critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weiner, J. M. (2010). No, it’s not your imagination; we’re biased against women. Politics Daily.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics Department, Joseph A. Butt, S.J. College of BusinessLoyola University New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations