Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 106, Issue 3, pp 295–300 | Cite as

The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans

  • Philipp Bagus
  • David Howden
Article

Abstract

Barnett and Block (J Bus Ethics 18(2):179–194, 2011) argue that one cannot distinguish between deposits and loans due to the continuum problem of maturities and because future goods do not exist—both essential characteristics that distinguish deposit from loan contracts. In a similar way but leading to opposite conclusions (Cachanosky, forthcoming) maintains that both maturity mismatching and fractional reserve banking are ethically justified as these contracts are equivalent. We argue herein that the economic and legal differences between genuine deposit and loan contracts are clear. This implies different legal obligations for these contracts, a necessary step in assessing the ethics of both fractional reserve banking and maturity mismatching. While the former is economically, legally, and perhaps most importantly ethically problematic, there are no such troubles with the latter.

Keywords

Banking Fraud Fractional reserves Maturity mismatching Natural law Loans and deposits Continuum problem Claims to future goods 

References

  1. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2009). The legitimacy of loan maturity mismatching: A risky, but not fraudulent, undertaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2011). The economic and legal significance offulldeposit availability. Working paper.Google Scholar
  3. Bagus, P., Howden, D., Block, W. E. (forthcoming). Deposits, loans and banking: Clarifying the debate. American Journal of Economics and Sociology.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, W., & Block, W. (2005). ‘Money: Capital good, consumers’ good, or (media of) exchange good? The Review of Austrian Economics, 18(2), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, W., & Block, W. (2007). Saving and investment: A praxeological approach. New Perspectives on Political Economy, 3(2), 129–138.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, W., & Block, W. (2008). Continuums. Etica & Politica, 10(1), 151–166.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, W., & Block, W. (2009). Time deposits, dimensions and fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 711–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett, W., & Block, W. (2011). Rejoinder to Bagus and Howden on borrowing short and lending long. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cachanosky, N. (forthcoming). A comment on Block and Barnett on time deposit and Bagus and Howden on loan maturity mismatching.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty: Vol. 1. Rules and order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hoppe, H.-H., Hülsmann, J. G., & Block, W. (1998). Against fiduciary media. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(1), 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huerta de Soto, J. (2006/2009). Money, bank credit and economic cycles. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Leoni, B. (1961). Freedom and the law. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
  14. Peirce, C. S. (1906/1955). The concept of God. In: J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 375–379). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Rothbard, M. N., (1962/2001). Man, economy, and state. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Rothbard, M. N. (1982/1998). The ethics of liberty. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Selgin, G. (2010, April 14). Those dishonest goldsmiths. Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589709.
  18. von Mises, L. (1951/1952). Profit and loss. In Planning for freedom (3rd edn, pp. 108–50). South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press.Google Scholar
  19. White, L. H. (2007). Huerta de Soto’s case against fractional reserves. Free-Market News Network, January 8.Google Scholar
  20. Yeager, L. B. (2010). Bank reserves: A dispute over words and classification. The Review of Austrian Economics, 23(2), 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Economics IUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Business and Social SciencesSt. Louis UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations