Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 105, Issue 2, pp 197–219

Personalist Business Ethics and Humanistic Management: Insights from Jacques Maritain

Article

Abstract

The integration of personalism into business ethics has been recently studied. Research has also been conducted on humanistic management approaches. The conceptual relationship between personalism and humanism, however, has not been fully addressed. This article furthers that research by arguing that a true humanistic management is personalistic. Moreover, it claims that personalism is promising as a sound philosophical foundation for business ethics. Insights from Jacques Maritain’s work are discussed in support of these conclusions. Of particular interest is his distinction between human person and individual based on a realistic metaphysics that, in turn, grounds human dignity and the natural law as the philosophical basis for human rights, personal virtues, and a common good defined in terms of properly human ends. Although Maritain is widely regarded as one of the foremost twentieth century personalist philosophers, his contribution has not been sufficiently considered in the business ethics and humanistic management literature. Important implications of Maritainian personalism for business ethics as philosophical study and as practical professional pursuit are discussed.

Keywords

Business ethics Common good Human rights Humanism and humanistic management Maritain, Jacques Moral and ethical aspects Natural law Personalism Philosophy Virtue 

References

  1. Acevedo, A. (2009). Humanism in Pope John Paul II’s theology of the body. Unpublished master’s thesis, Holy Apostles College & Seminary, Cromwell, CT.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.Google Scholar
  3. Alzola, M. (2011). The reconciliation project: Separation and integration in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. (1997). Values-based management. Academy of Management Executive, 11(4), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arenas, D. (2006). Problematizing and enlarging the notion of humanistic education. In P. Gagliardi & B. Czarniawska (Eds.), Management education and humanities (pp. 113–134). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Argandoña, A. (1998). The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Babiuch-Luxmoore, J. (1999). Personalism and social commitment: Some reflections from Poland. Ethical Perspectives, 6(1), 91–95.Google Scholar
  8. Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. G. (Eds.). (2008). Ethical theory and business (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Bouckaert, L. (1999). The project of a personalistic economics. Ethical Perspectives, 6(1), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouckaert, L., & Ghesquiere, R. (2004). Dostoyevsky’s Grand Inquisitor as a mirror for the ethics of institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowie, N. E. (1991). Challenging the egoistic paradigm. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bragues, G. (2006). Seek the good life, not money: The Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2008). The unholy alliance of business and science. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1/2), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Camenisch, P. R. (1981). Business ethics: On getting to the heart of the matter. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1(1), 59–69.Google Scholar
  15. Capaldi, N. (2004). Jacques Maritain: La vie intellectuelle. The Review of Metaphysics, 58(2), 399–421.Google Scholar
  16. Cascio, W. F. (2003). Responsible restructuring: Seeing employees as assets, not costs. Ivey Business Journal, 68(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  17. Cherry, M. (2009). The humanist tradition. In H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, & E. von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business (pp. 26–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Lubac, H. (1963/1995). The drama of atheist humanism. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  19. DeGeorge, R. T. (2009). Business ethics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. DeMarco, D. (1991). The Christian personalism of Jacques Maritain. Faith & Reason (Summer). Accessed April 21, 2006, from http://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/FR91201.htm.
  21. DeMarco, D. (2004a). Ayn Rand. In D. DeMarco & B. D. Wiker (Eds.), Architects of the culture of death (pp. 54–65). San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  22. DeMarco, D. (2004b). Peter Singer. In D. DeMarco & B. D. Wiker (Eds.), Architects of the culture of death (pp. 361–373). San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dierksmeier, C., & Pirson, M. (2009). Oikonomia versus chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle about the future orientation of business management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  26. Donaldson, T., & Werhane, P. H. (Eds.). (2008). Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Dreher, R. (2011, May 17). Inside the ‘black box’ of personhood. Accessed May 20, 2011, from http://www.bigquestionsonline.com/features/inside-the-black-box-of-personhood.
  28. Evans, J. W. (1952). Jacques Maritain’s personalism. The Review of Politics, 14(2), 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feser, E. (2010). Classical natural law theory, property rights, and taxation. Social Philosophy and Policy, 27(1), 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Finn, D. R. (2003). The foundations of economic personalism: Promise and peril. Journal of Markets & Morality, 6(2), 599–615.Google Scholar
  31. Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gagliardi, P. (2006). A role for humanities in the formation of managers. In P. Gagliardi & B. Czarniawska (Eds.), Management education and humanities (pp. 3–9). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giovanola, B. (2009). Re-thinking the anthropological and ethical foundation of economics and business: Human richness and capabilities enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2008). Philosophical foundations of workplace spirituality: A critical approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grabill, S. J. (2003). Introduction to economic personalism. Journal of Markets & Morality, 6(2), 597–598.Google Scholar
  39. Grassl, W., & Habisch, A. (2011). Ethics and economics: Towards a new humanistic synthesis for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Handy, C. (2002). What’s a business for? Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 49–55.Google Scholar
  41. Hartman, E. M. (2006). Can we teach character? An Aristotelian answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hartman, E. M. (2008). Reconciliation in business ethics: Some advice from Aristotle. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 253–265.Google Scholar
  43. Hartman, E. M. (2011). Virtue, profit, and the separation thesis: An Aristotelian view. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  44. Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S. E., & Slocum, J. W. (2008). Managing: A competency-based approach (11th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  45. Hendry, J. (2006). Management education and the humanities: The challenge of post-bureaucracy. In P. Gagliardi & B. Czarniawska (Eds.), Management education and humanities (pp. 21–44). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  46. Heugens, P., & Scherer, A. G. (2010). When organization theory met business ethics: Toward further symbioses. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 643–672.Google Scholar
  47. Hoivik, H., & Melé, D. (2009). Can an SME become a global citizen? Evidence from a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Huehn, M. P. (2008). Unenlightened economism: The antecedents of bad corporate governance and ethical decline. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 823–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jacobs, D. C. (2009). Dialogue on Locke’s business ethics. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(2), 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221.Google Scholar
  51. Kant, I. (1785/1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  52. Karakas, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lopes, M. P., Cunha, M. P., Kaiser, S., & Müller-Seitz, G. (2009). Positive organizational scholarship: Embodying a humanistic perspective on business. In H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, & E. von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business (pp. 278–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MacIntyre, A. (1981/2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  55. Maritain, J. (1929/1970). Three reformers: Luther, Descartes, Rousseau. New York: Apollo Editions.Google Scholar
  56. Maritain, J. (1931/2005). An introduction to philosophy. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
  57. Maritain, J. (1936a/1996). Freedom in the modern world. In O. Bird (Ed.), Integral humanism, freedom in the modern world, and a letter on independence (pp. 3–115). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  58. Maritain, J. (1936b/1996). Integral humanism. In O. Bird (Ed.), Integral humanism, freedom in the modern world, and a letter on independence (pp. 143–345). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  59. Maritain, J. (1939). Integral humanism and the crisis of modern times. The Review of Politics, 1(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Maritain, J. (1942). The end of Machiavellianism. The Review of Politics, 4(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Maritain, J. (1943a/1971). Education at the crossroads. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Maritain, J. (1943b/2001). Natural rights. In W. Sweet (Ed.), Natural law: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 75–98). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
  63. Maritain, J. (1947/1972). The person and the common good. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  64. Maritain, J. (1948/1966). Existence and the existent. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  65. Maritain, J. (1950/2001). The ontological and epistemological elements of natural law. Natural law and natural rights. In W. Sweet (Ed.), Natural law: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 25–74). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
  66. Maritain, J. (1951a). Man and the state. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Maritain, J. (1951b/2001). On knowledge through connaturality. In W. Sweet (Ed.), Natural law: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 13–24). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
  68. Maritain, J. (1952a). The apostolate of the pen. America, 199(8), 19.Google Scholar
  69. Maritain, J. (1952b). The range of reason. New York: Charles Scribner’s. Accessed June 22, 2006, from http://www.nd.edu/Departments/Maritain/etext/range.htm.
  70. Maritain, J. (1958). Reflections on America. New York: Charles Scribner’s. Accessed October 22, 2010, from, http://www2.nd.edu/Departments/Maritain/etext/reflect0.html.
  71. Maritain, J. (1960/1964). Moral philosophy: An historical and critical survey of the great systems (Vol. I). New York: Charles Scribner’s. Accessed September 22, 2009, from, http://www2.nd.edu/Departments/Maritain/etext/jmoral.htm.
  72. Maritain, J. (1961). On the use of philosophy: Three essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  73. Maritain, J. (1966/1968). The peasant of the Garonne. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  74. Marrus, M. R. (2004). The Ambassador & the Pope: Pius XII, Jacques Maritain & the Jews. Commonweal, 131(18), 14–19.Google Scholar
  75. McInerny, R. (2003). The very rich hours of Jacques Maritain: A spiritual life. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  76. Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Melé, D. (2005). Exploring the principle of subsidiarity in organisational forms. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Melé, D. (2009a). Current trends in humanism and business. In H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, & E. von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business (pp. 123–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Melé, D. (2009b). Editorial introduction: Towards a more humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Melé, D. (2009c). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Melé, D. (2010). Practical wisdom in managerial decision making. Journal of Management Development, 29(7/8), 637–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Melé, D., Argandoña, A., & Sánchez-Runde, C. (2011). Facing the crisis: Towards a new humanistic synthesis for business. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Moore, G. (2005). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 659–685.Google Scholar
  85. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  86. Novak, M. (2009). A salute to Jacques Maritain. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 21(1/2), 124–142.Google Scholar
  87. O’Boyle, E. J. (2003). Comments on the Foundations of Economic Personalism series. Journal of Markets & Morality, 6(2), 617–662.Google Scholar
  88. Orts, E. W., & Strudler, A. (2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Peus, C., & Frey, D. (2009). Humanism at work: Crucial organizational cultures and leadership principles. In H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, & E. von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in business (pp. 260–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502.Google Scholar
  91. Pirson, M. A., & Lawrence, P. R. (2010). Humanism in business—Towards a paradigm shift? Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Pirson, M., & Turnbull, S. (2011). Toward a more humanistic governance model: Network governance structures. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  94. Poole, E. (2009). Organisational spirituality—a literature review. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Proietti, P. W. (2009). Maritain on human dignity and human rights. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 21(1/2), 106–122.Google Scholar
  96. Puel, H. (1999). ‘Économie et Humanisme’ and personalism. Ethical Perspectives, 6(1), 85–91.Google Scholar
  97. Rocha, H., & Miles, R. (2009). A model of collaborative entrepreneurship for a more humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sandelands, L. (2009). The business of business is the human person: Lessons from the Catholic social tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schall, J. V. (1998). Jacques Maritain: The philosopher in society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  100. Schermerhorn, J. R. (2009). Exploring management (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  101. Sison, A. J. G. (2007). Toward a common good theory of the firm: The Tasubinsa case. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Small, M. W. (2006). A case for including business ethics and the humanities in management programs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Smith, C. (2010). What is a person? Rethinking humanity, social life, and moral good from the person up. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  104. Solomon, R. C. (1993). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Solomon, R. C. (2003). Victims of circumstances? A defense of virtue ethics in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 43–62.Google Scholar
  106. Spitzeck, H. (2011). An integrated model of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Starkey, K., & Tempest, S. (2006). The business school in ruins? In P. Gagliardi & B. Czarniawska (Eds.), Management education and humanities (pp. 101–112). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  108. Sweet, W. (2001). Introduction: Jacques Maritain: Life and thought. In W. Sweet (Ed.), Natural law: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 3–12). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
  109. Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Velasquez, M. G. (2006). Business ethics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  111. Velasquez, M., & Brady, F. N. (1997). Natural law and business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(2), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Victor, B., & Stephens, C. U. (1994). Business ethics: A synthesis of normative philosophy and empirical social science. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  114. von Kimakowitz, E., Pirson, M., Spitzeck, H., Dierksmeier, C., & Amann, W. (Eds.). (2010). Humanistic management in practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  115. Weiss, J. W. (2009). Business ethics (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  116. Whetstone, J. T. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Whetstone, J. T. (2002). Personalism and moral leadership: The servant leader with a transforming vision. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(4), 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Whetstone, J. T. (2003). The language of managerial excellence: Virtues as understood and applied. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Williams, T. D., & Bengtsson, J. O. (2009). Personalism. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed May 20, 2011, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personalism/.
  120. Wishloff, J. (2009). The land of realism and the shipwreck of idea-ism: Thomas Aquinas and Milton Friedman on the social responsibilities of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wojtyla, K. (1960/1993). Love and responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  122. Zúñiga, G. L. (2001). What is economic personalism? A phenomenological analysis. Journal of Markets & Morality, 4(2), 151–175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, School of Business AdministrationUniversity of Puerto RicoSan JuanUSA

Personalised recommendations