Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 105, Issue 1, pp 95–105

Empathy in Leadership: Appropriate or Misplaced? An Empirical Study on a Topic that is Asking for Attention

Article

Abstract

Leadership has become a more popular term than management, even though it is understood that both phenomena represent important organizational behaviors. This paper focuses on empathy in leadership, and presents the findings of a study conducted among business students over the course of 3 years. Finding that empathy consistently ranked lowest in the ratings, the researchers set out to discover the driving motives behind this invariable trend, and conducted a second study to obtain opinions about possible underlying factors. The paper presents the findings of both studies, as well as literature reviews on the differences between management and leadership, a historical overview of leadership, a reflection of 21st century leadership, the ongoing debate on the effects of corporate psychopaths on ethical performance, and scholars’ perception on empathy in corporate leadership. The findings indicate the need for a paradigm shift in corporations as well as business schools in regards to leaders’ required skills, and suggest a proactive approach from business faculty to change the current paradigm.

Keywords

Empathy Leadership Emotional intelligence Narcissism Psychopaths Servant leadership Social skills 

References

  1. Allio, R. J. (2009). Leadership—the five big ideas. Strategy & Leadership, 37(2), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, H., & Furniss, P. (2009). A successful leader or a psychopathic individual? Management Services, 53(4), 22–24.Google Scholar
  3. Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babiak, P. (1995). When psychopaths go to work: A case study of an industrial psychopath. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Regan Books/Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Blame it on the Brain (October, 2006). Young Minds, 16 (UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience). Retrieved November 14, 2010 from http://www.cypnow.co.uk/news/759494/.headlinks.
  7. Board, B. J., & Fritzon, K. (2005). Disordered personalities at work. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(1), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boddy, C. (2010). Corporate psychopaths and productivity. Management Services, 54(1), 26–30.Google Scholar
  9. Boddy, C., Ladyshewsky, R., & Galvin, P. (2010). The influence of corporate psychopaths on corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment to employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, T., Sautter, J., Littvay, L., Sautter, A., & Bearnes, B. (2010). Ethics and personality: Empathy and narcissism as moderators of ethical decision making in business students. Journal of Education for Business, 85(4), 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciulla, J. B. (2010). Being there: Why leaders should not “fiddle” while Rome burns. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40(1), 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, J. (2005). Working with monsters. How to identify and protect yourself from workplace psychopaths. Sydney: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Devay, M. (2010). Empathy: A multidisciplinary approach. Dissertation, Georgetown University, District of Columbia, United States. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text (Publication No. AAT 1475426).Google Scholar
  14. Donaldson, C. (2008, September 30). Defining tomorrow’s leader. HR Leader. Retrieved November 14, 2010 from http://www.humanresourcesmagazine.com.au/articles/E8/0C05A6E8.asp?Type=60&Category=1166.
  15. Eriksen, M. (2009). Authentic leadership: Practical reflexivity, self-awareness and self-authorship. Journal of Management Education, 33(6), 747–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hare, R. (1994). Predators: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Psychology Today, 27(1), 54–63.Google Scholar
  17. Hopen, D. (2010). The changing role and practices of successful leaders. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 33(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
  18. House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Izenberg, D. (January, 2007). Does therapy belong in class? Maclean’s, 119(52–53), 34–35.Google Scholar
  20. Karnes, R. (2009). A change in business ethics: The impact on employer-employee relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ketola, T. (2006). From CR-psychopaths to responsible corporations: Waking up the inner sleeping beauty of companies. Corporate Social - Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(2), 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, (2010). Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations-oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader-member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCrimmon, M. (2010). Reinventing leadership and management. Ivey Business Journal Online, 74(3), 1.Google Scholar
  24. McDonald, T. (2008, December). Management matters: Make love and work. Successful Meetings. Retrieved November 14, 2010 from http://www.successfulmeetings.com/Event-Planning/Meeting-Planning/Articles/Management-Matters-Make-Love-and-Work/.
  25. McLean, J. E. (2005). Management and leadership: Dispelling the myths, ‘Management Matters’. The British Journal of Administrative Management, 9(1), 16–17.Google Scholar
  26. Mill Chalmers, W. (2010). Training to survive the workplace of today. Industrial and Commercial Training, 42(5), 270–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mostovicz, E. I., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2009). A dynamic theory of leadership development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(6), 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nienaber, H. (2010). Conceptualisation of management and leadership. Management Decision, 48(5), 661–675.Google Scholar
  29. Northouse, P. (2004). Leadership theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Pech, R. J., & Slade, B. W. (2007). Organisational sociopaths: Rarely challenged, often promoted. Why? Society and Business Review, 2(3), 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pepper, T. (2005, June 21). Of criminals and CEOs. Newsweek, 48.Google Scholar
  32. Polychroniou, P. V. (2009). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership of supervisors: The impact on team effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 15(7/8), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schilling, L. (2010). A historical analysis of the relationship between charisma and the making of great leaders. Ph.D. dissertation, Walden University, Minnesota, United States. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text (Publication No. AAT 3397897).Google Scholar
  34. Stout, M. (2005, January). The ice people. Psychology Today, 38(1), 72–76, 78.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, M. (2010). An enlightenment fit for the 21st century. New Statesman, 139(5006), 20.Google Scholar
  36. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Washington, R. R., Sutton, C. D., & Field, H. S. (2006). Individual differences in servant leadership: The roles of values and personality. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 27(8), 700–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weinstein, M. (July, 2009). Emotional evaluation. Training Magazine, 20–23.Google Scholar
  39. Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessWoodbury UniversityBurbankUSA

Personalised recommendations