Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 105, Issue 1, pp 17–25

Managers and Moral Dissonance: Self Justification as a Big Threat to Ethical Management?



This article discusses the implications of moral dissonance for managers, and how dissonance induced self justification can create an amplifying feedback loop and downward spiral of immoral behaviour. After addressing the nature of moral dissonance, including the difference between moral and hedonistic dissonance, the writer then focuses on dissonance reduction strategies available to managers such as rationalization, self affirmation, self justification, etc. It is noted that there is a considerable literature which views the organization as a potentially corrupting institution and a source of acute levels of moral dissonance. A simplified process model linking immoral behaviour, dissonance and rationalization is mooted, and some recent theories which question traditional dissonance models, including the free choice paradigm (FCP), are considered. The writer concludes that in the light of the above mentioned critical theories, it may be assumed that the levels of moral dissonance, and the extent of rationalization/self justification amongst managers, are more a function of personality and situational factors than previously assumed.


Management Morality Cognitive dissonance Moral dissonance Self justification Free choice paradigm 


  1. Aronson, E. (1995). The social animal. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, E. (2004). The social animal. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of power. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, P. (2005). Descartes’ baby: How child development explains what makes US human. London: Arrow.Google Scholar
  5. Brady, F. N., & Logsdon, J. M. (1988). “Stanford prison experiment” and the relevance for teaching business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2003). Human resource practice: Theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, M. K. (2008). Rationalization and cognitive dissonance: Do choices affect or reflect preferences? Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No.1669. Accessed 7 June 2010.
  8. Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Brunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Cruver, B. (2003). Enron: Anatomy of greed. London: Arrow.Google Scholar
  11. Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darley, J. M. (1996). How organizations socialize individuals into evildoing. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Brunsel (Eds.), Codes of Conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hauser, M. D. (2007). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  16. Holland, R. W., et al. (2002). Dissonance on the road: Self-esteem as a moderator of internal and external self-justification strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1713–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Konovsky, M. A., & Jaster, F. (1989). “Blaming the victim” and other ways business men and women account for questionable behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Messick, D. M., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (Eds.). (1996). Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Persaud, R.: 2007, Raj Persaud on how cognitive dissonance affects managers. Health Service Journal, 19th November 2007. Accessed 4 April, 2010, from
  20. Ramachandran, V. S. (1999). Phantoms in the brain. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  21. Sears, D., et al. (1991). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Sims, R. R. (1992). Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 651–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slater, L. (2005). Opening Skinner’s box: Great psychological experiments of the twentieth century. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  24. Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tavris, C., & Aronson, E. (2008). Mistakes were made (but not by me). London: Pinter & Martin.Google Scholar
  26. Thibodeau, R., & Aronson, E. (1992). Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of self-concept in dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tierney, J. (2008). And behind door no. 1, a fatal flaw. New York Times. Accessed 7 June 2010.
  28. Tierney, J. (2010). Monkeys, candy and cognitive dissonance, TierneyLab/New York Times. Accessed 7 June 2010.
  29. Tompkins, P & J. Lawley. (2009). Cognitive dissonance and creative tension—the same or different? The Clean Collection. Accessed 27 May 2010.
  30. Tsang, J. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behaviour. Review of General Psychology, 6, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Viswesvaran, C., & Deshpande, S. P. (1996). Ethics, success, and job satisfaction: A test of dissonance theory in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1056–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wojciske, B., & Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25, 472–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright, R. (1996). The moral animal: Why we are the way we are. London: Arrow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UWICCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations