Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 104, Issue 4, pp 449–460 | Cite as

“Why Don’t Consumers Care About CSR?”: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions

  • Magdalena Öberseder
  • Bodo B. Schlegelmilch
  • Verena Gruber
Article

Abstract

There is an unresolved paradox concerning the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in consumer behavior. On the one hand, consumers demand more and more CSR information from corporations. On the other hand, research indicates a considerable gap between consumers’ apparent interest in CSR and the limited role of CSR in purchase behavior. This article attempts to shed light on this paradox by drawing on qualitative data from in-depth interviews. The findings show that the evaluation of CSR initiatives is a complex and hierarchically structured process, during which consumers distinguish between core, central, and peripheral factors. This article describes these factors in detail and explains the complexity of consumers’ assessment of CSR. These insights then serve as a basis for discussing the theoretical and managerial implications of the research findings. To this end, the article contributes to a better understanding of the role of CSR in consumption decisions.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Consumer behavior Purchase intention Qualitative research 

References

  1. Auger, P., & Devinney, T. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckmann, S. C., Christensen, A. S., & Christensen, A. G. (2001). Myths of nature and environmentally responsible behaviours: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the EMAC, Bergen.Google Scholar
  4. Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer ethics across cultures. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8(3), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernhard, R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
  7. Biehal, G. J., & Sheinin, D. A. (2007). The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bower, A. B., & Grau, S. L. (2009). Explicit donations and inferred endorsements. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bristol, T., & Fern, E. F. (2003). The effects of interaction on consumers’ attitudes in focus groups. Psychology and Marketing, 20(5), 433–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunk, K. H. (2010a). Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions—A consumer perspective of corporate ethics. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunk, K. H. (2010b). Reputation building: Beyond our control? Inferences in consumers’ ethical perception formation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(4), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. (2008). Corporate social responsibility—Readings and cases in a global context. US and Canada: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design—Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). US: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Devinney, T. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., Eckhardt, G., & Birtchnell, T. (2006). The other CSR: Consumer social responsibility. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=901863.
  21. Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geoffrey, P. L. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghauri, P. N., & Gronhaug, K. (2002). Research methods in business studies—A practical guide (2nd ed.). Essex: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marin, L., & Ruiz, S. (2007). “I need you too!” corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006a). Corporate social responsibility: International perspectives. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  33. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006b). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 38(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siegle, L. (2009). Is buying fair trade a waste of money? The Observer Magazine, p. 59.Google Scholar
  41. Sinkovics, R. R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P. N. (2005). Analysing textual data in international marketing research. Qualitative Market Research, 8(1), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, V., & Langford, P. (2009). Evaluating the impact of corporate social responsibility programs on consumers. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(1), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Snider, J., Paul, R. H., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Sykes, W. (1990). Validity and reliability in qualitative market research: A review of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32(3), 289–328.Google Scholar
  47. Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wooten, D. B., & Reed Ii, A. (2000). A conceptual overview of the self-presentational concerns and response tendencies of focus group participants. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 9(3), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magdalena Öberseder
    • 1
  • Bodo B. Schlegelmilch
    • 1
  • Verena Gruber
    • 1
  1. 1.WU Vienna, Institute for International Marketing ManagementViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations