Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 104, Issue 4, pp 499–524 | Cite as

Uncovering the Intellectual Structure of Research in Business Ethics: A Journey Through the History, the Classics, and the Pillars of Journal of Business Ethics



After almost 30 years of publications, Journal of Business Ethics (JBE) has achieved the position of main marketplace for business ethics discussion and knowledge generation. Given the large amount of knowledge produced, an assessment of the state of the art could benefit both the constructive development of the discipline and the further growth of the journal itself. As the evolution of a discipline is set to be reflected in the evolution of its leading journal, we attempt to characterize changes in the intellectual structure of business ethics through a bibliometric analysis of articles published in JBE. Specifically, we conduct a knowledge-stock analysis to assess the evolution, major trends, and current state of the journal. Additionally, we use citation and co-citation analysis to provide an accurate description of the content and the advancement of research in business ethics. Through the results of our analysis, we are able to: (1) pinpoint the characteristics of the growing stock of knowledge published by JBE over the years; (2) identify the most influential works on business ethics research; and (3) detect the formation and evolution of schools of thought in business ethics.


Business ethics Corporate social responsibility Ethical decision making Bibliometrics Literature review 


  1. Albrecht, C., Thompson, J. A., Hoopes, J. L., & Rodrigo, P. (2010). Business ethics journal rankings as perceived by business ethics scholars. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical investigation of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, H., & R. Pieters (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time, Journal of Marketing, 67(April), 123–139.Google Scholar
  5. Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2007). Twenty years of the journal of product innovation management: History, participants, and knowledge stocks and flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(3), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2010). In search of the classics: A study of the impact of JPIM papers from 1984 to 2003. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd, B. K., Finkelstein, S., & Gove, S. (2005). How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism in shaping research outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 841–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt, R. S. (1977). Positions in multiple network systems, part one: A general conception of stratification and prestige in a system of actors cast as a social typology. Social Forces, 56, 106–131.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1,500 articles published in journal of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281–1303.Google Scholar
  11. Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 4, 195–201.Google Scholar
  12. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980–1985: A co-citation analysis. Management of Information System Quarterly, 11(3), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Culnan, M. J., O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972–1984: A co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De George, R. T. (2005). A history of business ethics. In Proceedings of the accountable corporation. California: Santa Clara University.Google Scholar
  16. Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  17. Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: A bibliometric study of the journal of product innovation management, 1984–2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 437–451.Google Scholar
  18. Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing. Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman, D. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author co-citations in the first 15 years of the journal of consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Trevino, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Machold, S., Ahmed, P., & Farquhar, S. (2008). Corporate governance and ethics: A feminist perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 665–678.Google Scholar
  24. McCain, K. W. (1986). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 111–122.Google Scholar
  25. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or mispecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma, Z. (2010). The status of contemporary business ethics research: Present and future. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 255–265.Google Scholar
  28. O’Fallon, M. J., & Batterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pasadeos, Y., Phelps, J., & Kim, B. (1998). Disciplinary impact of advertising scholars: Temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 53–70.Google Scholar
  31. Pfeffer, J., Long, A., & Strehl, K. (1977). Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces, 55(4), 938–951.Google Scholar
  32. Pilkington, A., & Liston-Heyes, C. (1999). Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co-citation study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science… and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers, R. C., & Maranto, C. L. (1989). Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 636–649.Google Scholar
  36. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384.Google Scholar
  37. Tahai, A., & Meyer, M. J. (1999). A revealed preference study of management journals’ direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(3), 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 545–607.Google Scholar
  39. Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Üsdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A comparison of co-citation networks. Organization Studies, 16(3), 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Liedekerke, L., & Dubbink, W. (2008). Twenty years of European business ethics—Past developments and future concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 273–280.Google Scholar
  42. Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769.Google Scholar
  43. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society forInformation Science, 49(4), 327–355.Google Scholar

Complete References for the Most Cited Works in JBE from 1982 to 2008

  1. Aristotle, (1980). Nichomachean ethics. (T. Irving, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Baumhart, R. (1961). How ethical are businessmen? Harvard Business Review, 39(4), 6–19.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, V. (1979). Moral issues in business. Belmount, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Beauchamp, T. L., & Bowie, N. R. (1979). Ethical theory and business. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bommer, M., Gratta, C., Gravendir, J., & Tuttle, M. (1987). A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowie, N. E. J. (1982). Business ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Brenner, S. N., & Molander, E. A. (1977). Is the ethics of business changing? Harvard Business Review, 55(1), 57–71.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, A. Z. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical? Harvard Business Review, 46(l), 143–153.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, A. B. (1975). Managerial ethics: A post-watergate view. Business Horizons, 18, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B. (1989). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: South Western.Google Scholar
  12. Cavanagh, G. F., Moberg, D. J., & Velasquez, M. (1981). The ethics of organizational polirics. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 363–374.Google Scholar
  13. Chonko, L. B., & Hunt, S. D. (1985). Ethics and marketing management: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 13(4), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De George, R. T. (1982). Business ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Donaldson, T. (1989). Ethics in international business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.Google Scholar
  18. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–82.Google Scholar
  20. Donaldson, T., & Werhane, P. (1983). Ethical Issues in business: A philosophical approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Ewing, D. W. (1977). Freedom inside the organization: Bringing civil liberties to the workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferrell, O. C., & Weaver, M. (1978). Ethical beliefs of marketing managers. Journal of Marketing, 42, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision making models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 11, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  30. Fritzsche, D., & Becker, H. (1984). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy—An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Goodpaster, K., & Matthews, J. (1982). Can a corporation have a conscience? Harvard Business Review, 60(1), 132–141.Google Scholar
  33. Hair, J. F. (1992). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Hegarty, H. W., & Sims, H. P. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. (1979). Organizational philosophy, policies and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3), 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultural consequences: International differences in work related values. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1993). The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and a revision. In C. Smith & J. Quelch (Eds.), Ethics in marketing (pp. 775–784). Irwin: Homewood.Google Scholar
  39. Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). A theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  42. Kidwell, J. M., Stevens, R. E., & Bethke, A. L. (1987). Differences in the ethical perceptions between male and female managers: Myth or reality. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kohlberg, L. (1969). The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  44. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (Vol. I). San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  46. Murphy, P. E., & Laczniak G. R. (1981). Marketing ethics: A review with implications for managers, educators and researchers, Review of Marketing 1981 (pp. 251–266). Chicago: American Marketing association.Google Scholar
  47. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Peters, T. J., & Waterman, T. H. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  49. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. R. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  53. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Solomon, R. C. (1992). Ethics and excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stone, C. (1975). Where the law ends. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  57. Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
  58. Trevino, L. K. (1990). A cultural perspective on changing and developing organizational ethics. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 195–230.Google Scholar
  59. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Velasquez, M. G. (1982). Business ethics. Concepts and cases. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  61. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Calabretta
    • 1
  • Boris Durisin
    • 2
  • Marco Ogliengo
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MarketingBI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Management and TechnologyBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  3. 3.McKinsey & Company ItalyMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations