Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 104, Issue 3, pp 361–370 | Cite as

The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation

  • Ching-Hsun ChangEmail author


This study utilizes structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the positive effect of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage in the Taiwanese manufacturing industry via the mediator: green innovation performance. This study divides green innovation into green product innovation and green process innovation. The empirical results show that corporate environmental ethics positively affects green product innovation and green process innovation. In addition, this study verifies that green product innovation mediates the positive relationship between corporate environmental ethics and competitive advantage, but green process innovation does not. Therefore, corporate environmental ethics can not only affect competitive advantage directly, but also influence it indirectly via green product innovation in the Taiwanese manufacturing industry. Taiwanese manufacturing companies can increase their corporate environmental ethics and green product innovation to enhance their competitive advantages.


Corporate environmental ethics Green product innovation Green process innovation Competitive advantage 


  1. Ahmed, N. U., Montagno, R. V., & Firenze, R. J. (1998). Organizational performance and environmental consciousness: An empirical study. Management Decision, 36(2), 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656–665.Google Scholar
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, S. (1991). Environmental regulations for competitive advantage. Business Strategy Review, 2(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berrone, P. (2009). Green keys to unlock competitive advantage. ISIE Insight, 2, 50–57.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, Y. S. (2008a). The driver of green innovation and green image—Green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, Y. S. (2008b). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y. S. (2011). Green organizational identity: Sources and consequence. Management Decision, 49(3), 384–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coyne, K. P. (1986). Sustainable competitive advantage—What it is, what it isn’t. Business Horizons, 29(1), 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daghfous, A. (2004). Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 69(2), 21–27.Google Scholar
  15. Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: Environmental concerns as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. New York Times Magazine, 13, 32–33.Google Scholar
  20. García-Morales, V. J., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Llorens-Montes, F. J. (2007). Effects of technology absorptive capacity and technology proactivity on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19(4), 527–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greeno, J. L., & Robinson, S. N. (1992). Rethinking corporate environmental management. Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(3), 222–232.Google Scholar
  22. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.Google Scholar
  24. Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66–77.Google Scholar
  25. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1997). Does it pay to be green? Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 31–37.Google Scholar
  26. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffman, A. J. (1997). From heresy to dogma. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
  28. Learned, E. P. (1969). Business policy: Text and cases. Homewood, IL: RD Irwin.Google Scholar
  29. Marcus, A. A., & Fremeth, A. R. (2009). Green management matters regardless. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  31. Nancarrow, C., Brace, I., & Wright, L. T. (2001). Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies: Dealing with socially desirable responses in market research. The Marketing Review, 2, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 57–64.Google Scholar
  34. Orsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.Google Scholar
  35. Peattie, K. (1992). Green marketing. London: Pitman Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  36. Peattie, K., & Ratnayaka, M. (1992). Responding to the green movement. Industrial Marketing Management, 21(2), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2008). Local responsiveness pressure, subsidiary resources, green management adoption and subsidiary’s performance: Evidence from Taiwanese manufactures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips, D. L., & Clancy, K. J. (1972). Some effects of social desirability in survey studies. American Journal of Sociology, 77(5), 921–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive advantage: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Porter, M. E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609–620.Google Scholar
  41. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.Google Scholar
  42. Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prakash, A. (2002). Green marketing, public policy and managerial strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. E. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 681–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shrivastava, P. (1994). Castrated environment: Greening organizational studies. Organization Studies, 15(5), 705–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stewart, T. A. (1994). Your company’s most valuable asset: Intellectual capital. Fortune, 130(7), 68–74.Google Scholar
  51. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. III (1997). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  53. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–51.Google Scholar
  56. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999a). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999b). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationTamkang UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations