Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 47–55 | Cite as

Consumer Perceptions of the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Andrea J. S. Stanaland
  • May O. Lwin
  • Patrick E. Murphy


Perceptions of a firm’s stance on corporate social responsibility (CSR) are influenced by its corporate marketing efforts including branding, reputation building, and communications. The current research examines CSR from the consumer’s perspective, focusing on antecedents and consequences of perceived CSR. The findings strongly support the fact that particular cues, namely perceived financial performance and perceived quality of ethics statements, influence perceived CSR which in turn impacts perceptions of corporate reputation, consumer trust, and loyalty. Both consumer trust and loyalty were also found to reduce the perceived risk that consumers experience in buying and using products. From these significant findings, we draw several conclusions and implications, including the importance of enhancing firm focus toward its ethical commitment and long-term reputation.


Corporate marketing Corporate social responsibility Ethics statements Stakeholders 


  1. Aupperle, K. D., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical investigation of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmer, J. M. T. (2008). Identity based views of the corporation: Insights from corporate identity, organizational identity, social identity, visual identity, corporate brand identity and corporate image. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 879–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balmer, J. M. T. (2009). Corporate marketing: Apocalypse, advent and epiphany. Management Decision, 47(4), 544–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmer, J. M. T., Fukukawa, K., & Gray, E. R. (2007). The nature and management of ethical corporate identity: A commentary on corporate identity, corporate social responsibility and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balmer, J. M. T., & Greyser, S. A. (2002). Managing the multiple identities of the corporation. California Management Review, 44(3), 72–86.Google Scholar
  6. Balmer, J. M. T., & Greyser, S. A. (2006). Corporate marketing: Integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, corporate image and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 730–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balmer, J. M. T. & Powell, S. M. (2006). What is corporate and organisational marketing? International Centre for Corporate Marketing Studies.
  8. Balmer, J. M. T., & Soenen, G. B. (1999). The acid test of corporate identity management. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belt, J. A., & Paolillo, J. (1982). The influence of corporate image and specificity of candidate qualifications on response to recruitment advertisement. Journal of Management, 8, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Benson, G. C. S. (1989). Codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacharya, C. B., Hayagreeva, R., & Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59, 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Markets versus hierarchies: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, S. P. (1995). The moderating effects of insupplier/outsupplier status on organizational buyer attitudes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(3), 170–181.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.Google Scholar
  16. Cassell, C., Johnson, P., & Smith, K. (1997). Opening the black box: Corporate codes of ethics in their organizational context. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(10), 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiles, T. H., & McMackin, J. F. (1996). Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review, 21, 73–99.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, J., & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: A cross sectoral analysis of UK top 100 companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.Google Scholar
  20. Deegan, C. (2000). Financial accounting theory. Roseville, NSW: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction—The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures—A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  25. Fukukawa, K., Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (2007). Mapping the interface between corporate identity, ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hair, J., Andersen, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Hawes, J. M., Mast, K. E., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Trust earning perceptions of sellers and buyers. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 9, 1–8.Google Scholar
  29. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1, 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lantos, G. P. (1999). Motivating moral corporate behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(3), 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Mathews, M. R. (1993). Socially responsible accounting. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  38. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.Google Scholar
  40. Murphy, P. E. (1998). Eighty exemplary ethics statements. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  41. Murphy, P. E. (2005). Developing, communicating and promoting corporate ethics statements: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(2), 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murphy, P. E., Laczniak, G. R., Bowie, N. E., & Klein, T. A. (2005). Ethical marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  43. Murphy, P. E., Laczniak, G. R., & Wood, G. (2007). An ethical basis for relationship marketing: A virtue ethics perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1/2), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 15(3), 344–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. (1996). A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Podnar, K., & Golob, U. (2007). CSR expectations: The focus of corporate marketing. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12(4), 326–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  51. Purohit, D., & Srivastava, J. (2001). Effects of manufacturer reputation, retailer reputation, and product warranty on consumer judgments of product quality: A cue diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwartz, M. S. (2005). Universal moral values for corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1/2), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shimp, A. T., & Bearden, W. O. (1982). Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers’ risk perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 38–46.Google Scholar
  54. Simmons, C. J., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1991). Inference effects without inference making? Effects of missing information on discounting and use of presented information. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(March), 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  58. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of group behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Urban, G. L., Sultan, F., & Qualls, W. J. (2000). Placing trust at the center of your internet strategy. Sloan Management Review, 42, 39–49.Google Scholar
  61. Valentine, S., & Barnett, T. (2002). Ethics codes and sales professional’s perceptions of their organization’s ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(3), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waddock, S. E., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woodward, D. G., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management, 7(4), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Worcester, S. R. (2009). Reflections on corporate reputations. Management Decision, 47(4), 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea J. S. Stanaland
    • 1
  • May O. Lwin
    • 2
  • Patrick E. Murphy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Marketing, College of Business & EconomicsRadford UniversityRadfordUSA
  2. 2.Division of Public and Promotional Communication, Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and InformationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Marketing, Mendoza College of BusinessUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations