How Sustainability Ratings Might Deter ‘Greenwashing’: A Closer Look at Ethical Corporate Communication
- 9.6k Downloads
Of the many ethical corporate marketing practices, many firms use corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication to enhance their corporate image. Yet, consumers, overwhelmed by these more or less well-founded CSR claims, often have trouble identifying truly responsible firms. This confusion encourages ‘greenwashing’ and may make CSR initiatives less effective. On the basis of attribution theory, this study investigates the role of independent sustainability ratings on consumers’ responses to companies’ CSR communication. Experimental results indicate the negative effect of a poor sustainability rating for corporate brand evaluations in the case of CSR communication, because consumers infer less intrinsic motives by the brand. Sustainability ratings thus could act to deter ‘greenwashing’ and encourage virtuous firms to persevere in their CSR practices.
KeywordsEthical corporate marketing CSR communication Attribution theory Sustainability ratings
- ARPP (French Advertising Regulation Bureau). (2009). Advertising and Environment 2008. Study report available at www.arpp-pub.org.
- Balmer, J. M. T., & Greyser, S. A. (2003). Revealing the corporation. Perspectives on identity, image, reputation, corporate branding, and corporate level marketing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Balmer, J. M. T., & Greyser, S. A. (2007). Corporate marketing: Integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, corporate image and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing, 40(7–8), 730–741.Google Scholar
- Benoit-Moreau, F., & Parguel, B. (2010). Building brand equity with environmental communication: An empirical investigation in France. EuroMed Journal of Business 6(1), 100−116.Google Scholar
- Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
- Bradford, R. (2007). Greenwash confronted: Misleading advertisement regulation in the European Union and its member states. Study report available at www.foeeurope.org/corporates/pdf/greenwash_confronted.pdf.
- Chumpitaz-Caceres, R., & Vanhamme, J. (2003). Les Processus Modérateurs et Médiateurs: Distinction Conceptuelle, Aspects Analytiques et Illustrations. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 18(2), 67–100.Google Scholar
- Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
- Dean, D. (2003). Consumer perception of corporate donations. Effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 91–102.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54.Google Scholar
- IFOP. (2008). L’acheteur de produits “verts” est de plus en plus exigeant. Le monde Economie, 3 June.Google Scholar
- Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility. Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Larceneux, F. (2007). Buzz and recommendations on internet. What impacts on box-office? Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 22(3), 45–64.Google Scholar
- Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1978). The hidden costs of reward. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Rifon, N., Choi, S., Trimble, C., & Li, H. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship. The moderating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 29–42.Google Scholar
- Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2004). See how ‘good’ we are: The dangers of using corporate social activities in communication campaigns. Advances in Consumer Research, 31(1), 302–303.Google Scholar
- Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2005). The use of corporate social responsibility arguments in communication campaigns: Does source credibility matter? Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 590–591.Google Scholar
- Van Riel, C. B. M. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar