Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 103, Issue 2, pp 239–253

An Epistemic Analysis of (Un)Sustainable Business

Article

Abstract

Michel Foucault famously analysed orders of knowledge, ‘epistemes’, in past European ages. In this study, his analytical method is fruitfully applied to gaining a better understanding of business sustainability within and beyond the Modern episteme. After an introduction to the contextual background for the study, this article provides (i) a justification for the use of a Foucauldian epistemic analytical method, (ii) an outline of the method, (iii) an application of the method to identify four sets of questions (morality, specialisation, anthropologization and mathematicization) that are both direct derivatives of the Modern episteme and problematic for sustainable development, and finally (iv) an application of the method to consider evidence for the emergence of a new episteme. Conclusions are also provided.

Key words

anthropologization business complexity economism foucault episteme realism sustainability 

ABBREVIATION

SD

Sustainable development

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amernic, J. H. and Russell J. C.: 2010, ‘Accounting as a Facilitator of Extreme Narcissism’, [online], Journal of Business Ethics. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/100281/?Content+Status=Accepted. Accessed 21 June 2010.
  2. Axley, S.R.: 2006, ‘Complexity: A Frontier for Management Education’, Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 295-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhabib, S.: 1986, Critique, Norm and Utopia, (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Benton, T.: 2008, ‘Environmental Values and Human Purposes’, Environmental Values, 17, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C.: 2003, Navigating Socio-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  6. Bhaskar, R.: 1978, A Realist Theory of Science, (Harvester Press, Brighton).Google Scholar
  7. Bhaskar, R.: 1979, The Possibility of Naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences, (Harvester Press, Brighton).Google Scholar
  8. Bhaskar, R.: 1986, Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation, (Verso, London).Google Scholar
  9. Bookchin, M.: 1982, The Ecology of Freedom, (Cheshire Books, Palo Alto, California).Google Scholar
  10. Brown, L.R.: 2001, State of the World 2001, (Earthscan, London).Google Scholar
  11. Campbell-Hunt, C.: 2007, ‘Complexity in practice’, Human Relations, 60 (5), 793-823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capra, F.: 2002, The Hidden Connections, (Flamingo, London).Google Scholar
  13. Critchley, S. (2001). Continental Philosophy: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Deem, R., Hillyard, S. and Reed, M.: 2007), ‘Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities’, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fergus, A.H.T. and Rowney, J.I.A.: 2005a, ‘Sustainable Development: Epistemological Frameworks & an Ethic of Choice’, Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 197-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fergus, A.H.T. and Rowney, J.I.A.: 2005b, ‘Sustainable Development: Lost Meaning and Opportunity?.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 17-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M.: 1970, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M.: 1980, ‘Truth and Power’, In Colin Gordon ed. Power/Knowledge: selected interviews, (Pantheon, New York).Google Scholar
  19. Geel, F.W.: 2010, ‘Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to sustainability), and the Multi-Level Perspective’, Research Policy, 39, 495-510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giddens, A.: 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity, (Polity Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  21. Gibson-Graham, J.K. et al. 2009, ‘An Economic Ethics for the Anthropocene’, Antipode, 41(1), 320–346.Google Scholar
  22. Gleick, J.: 1987, Chaos: making a new science, (Cardinal, London).Google Scholar
  23. Global Climate Change Facts: 2010, Global Climate Change Facts: The Truth, The Consensus, and the Skeptics, [online], Everett, J. T., Arlington, Virginia. Available at: http://www.climatechangefacts.info/#reality. Accessed 14 May 2010.
  24. Gray, R. and Bebbington, J.: 2007, ‘Corporate sustainability: Accountability and the pursuit of the impossible dream’, in G. Atkinson, G., Dietz, S., and Neumayer, E. (eds.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), pp 376-395.Google Scholar
  25. Holifield, R., Porter, M. and Walker, G.: 2009, ‘Spaces of Environmental Justice: Frameworks for Critical Engagement’, Antipode, 41(4), 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ISEE: 2010, The International Society for Ecological Economics, [online], The International Society for Ecological Economics, West Allis, USA. Available at: http://www.ecoeco.org/content/. Accessed 21 June 2010.
  27. Kauffman, S.: 1995, At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  28. Kemp, S.: 2005, ‘Critical Realism and the Limits of Philosophy’, European Journal of Social Theory, 8(2), 271-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kropotkin, P.: 1987, Mutual Aid: a factor of evolution (1902), (Freedom Press: London).Google Scholar
  30. Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  31. Lafferty, W.M. and Langhelle, O.: 1999, Towards Sustainable Development, (Macmillan: London).Google Scholar
  32. Leopold, A.: 1989, A Sand County Almanac, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  33. Luhmann, N.: 1989, Ecological Communication, (Polity Press, London).Google Scholar
  34. Martin, W.M.: 1997, Idealism and Objectivity: Understanding Fichte’s Jena Project, (Stanford University Press, Stanford).Google Scholar
  35. MetOffice: 2010, How Can I be Sure? [online], Met Office, Exeter, UK. Available at: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/guide/quick/doubts.html. Accessed 14 May 2010.
  36. Maturana, H. R. and Varela, F. J.: 1987, The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding, (Shambhala Publications, Boston).Google Scholar
  37. Meadows, D.J., Randers J. et al.: 2005, Limits to Growth: The 30-Year update, (Earthscan, London).Google Scholar
  38. Naess, A.: 1990, Ecology, community and lifestyle, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  39. Orr, D.W.: 1992, Ecological Literacy: education and the transition to a Postmodern World, (State University of New York: New York).Google Scholar
  40. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I.: 1985, Order out of Chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature, (Flamingo, London).Google Scholar
  41. PRME: 2010 Principles for Responsible Management Education, [online], UN Global Compact, New York. Available at: http://www.unprme.org/. Accessed 12 June 2010.
  42. Purvis, M. and Grainger, A. (eds.): 2004, Exploring Sustainable Development: Geographical Perspectives, (Earthscan, London).Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, K.: 2005, ‘Towards a Metaphysics of Complexity’. Interchange, 36, 1-2, 159-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sale, K.: 1985, Dwellers in the Land: the regional vision, (Sierra Club Books, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  45. SEAJ: 2010, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, [online], Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research, St. Andrews, Scotland. Available at: http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~csearweb/aboutcsear/seaj.html. Accessed 2 June 2010.
  46. Spash, C.L.: 2009, The New Environmental Pragmatists, Pluralism and Sustainability’, Environmental Values, 18, 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strogatz, S.: 2003, Sync: the emerging science of spontaneous order, (Penguin Books, London).Google Scholar
  48. Stacey, R.D.: 1991, The Chaos Frontier: Creative Strategic Control for Business, (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford).Google Scholar
  49. UNEP: 1999, Report of the UNEP Meeting on Early Warning of Emerging Environmental Threats, (United Nations Environment Programme Publications, Geneva).Google Scholar
  50. Thompson, K.: 2008, ‘Historicity and Transcendentality: Foucault, Cavaillès, and the Phenomenology of the Concept’. History and Theory, 47, 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our Common Future, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldU.K.
  2. 2.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations