Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc.: An Innovative Voluntary Code of Conduct to Protect Human Rights, Create Employment Opportunities, and Economic Development of the Indigenous People
- First Online:
- 619 Downloads
Environmental degradation and extractive industry are inextricably linked, and the industry’s adverse impact on air, water, and ground resources has been exacerbated with increased demand for raw materials and their location in some of the more environmentally fragile areas of the world. Historically, companies have managed to control calls for regulation and improved, i.e., more expensive, mining technologies by (a) their importance in economic growth and job creation or (b) through adroit use of their economic power and bargaining leverage against weak national governments, regional and international regulatory bodies. More recently, the industry has had to contend with another set of challenges that involved treatment of indigenous people and their traditional land rights, fair treatment of workers, human rights abuses, and bribery and corruption involving local officials and political leaders. These challenges currently fall outside the traditional areas of regulation and control. Nevertheless, they pose serious threat to the industry’s business practices because of their global scope, threat to company’s reputation, and long-term risks of political instability leading to increasing cost of capital. Industry has responded to these challenges by creating voluntary codes of conduct that would signify their intent to comply with higher standards of conduct, and assuage public opinion that no further action is called for. These codes, however, lack any monitoring mechanism and reporting integrity to assure the public that the industry members are indeed meeting their commitments. Consequently, pressure on the industry continues unabated and with ever increasing calls for mandatory regulation and oversight. This article examines the activities of one mining company, Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., which has taken a radically different approach in responding to these challenges at its mining operations in West Papua, Indonesia. While cooperating with industry-based efforts of voluntary codes of conduct, Freeport also initiated a radically different response through its own voluntary code that would directly focus on issues of human rights, treatment of indigenous people on whose traditional land its mine was located; economic development and job creation and, improvements in health, education, and housing facilities, to name a few. Additionally, the company earmarked large sums of money and involved representatives of the indigenous people in their management and disbursement. The company took an even more radical action when it committed itself to independent external audits of the company’s compliance with the code, and that these findings and company’s responses would be made public without prior censorship by the company. We analyze the nature of corporate culture, vision and risk-taking propensities of its management that would impel the company to embark on a high risk strategy whose outcomes could not be predicted with any degree of certainty before the fact. The parent company also had to confront discontent among the management ranks at the mine site because of cultural differences and management styles of expatriates and local (Indonesian) managers. Finally, we discuss in some detail the extensive and intensive character of a two phase audit conducted by the outside monitors, their findings, and the process by which they were implemented and reported to general public. We also evaluate the strengths and challenges posed by such audits, their importance to the company’s future, and how such projects might be undertaken by other companies.
Key wordsFreeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. extractive industry industry-wide voluntary codes of conduct individual company voluntary code of conduct human rights abuses indigenous people economic development corporate culture values and traditions top management vision and risk taking propensities third party independent audit and compliance monitoring NGO intervention and relationship military violence news media
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anonymous: March 14, 2003, ‘Millions Paid for Mine’, Herald Sun, Section World, http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/. Accessed July 13, 2010.
- Anonymous: July 14, 2009a, ‘Missing Bullets Mystery’, Herald Sun.Google Scholar
- Anonymous: July 16, 2009b, ‘Foreign Countries’ Could be Behind Indonesia Mine Attacks: Minister, Agence France Presse; Tom Allard: July 18, 2009, ‘Nine Slain in ‘Inside Job’ Attacks on Jakarta Hotels’.Google Scholar
- Anonymous: January 25, 2010a, ‘Six Hurt in Latest Attack on Papua Mine’, Hobart Mercury (Australia).Google Scholar
- Anonymous: March 23, 2010b, ‘Indonesia Sees Need for more Troops in Papua’, Agence France Presse.Google Scholar
- BBC Monitoring Asia Pacific: February 26, 2006, ‘Indonesia: Protesters End Blockade of US Mine’, The Jakarta Post. Accessed July 13, 2010. (Excerpt from article by Tb. Arie Rukmantara entitled: ‘Stone Fire’ Ends Freeport Standoff’, published in English by Indonesian newspaper The Jakarta Post Website).Google Scholar
- Diamond, J.: 2005, Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
- Haufler, V.: 2009, ‘The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme: An Innovation in Global Governance and Conflict Prevention’, Journal of Business Ethics 89(Suppl.), 403–416.Google Scholar
- International Center for Corporate Accountability, Inc. www.sicca-ca.org.
- International Crisis Group: March 11, 2010, Radicalization and Dialogue in Papua. Asia Report No. 188, pp. 18–24Google Scholar
- Karmini, N.: July 16, 2009, ‘Indonesia to Deploy Special Police Force After Wave of Shootings at Freeport Mine in Papua’, The Canadian Press.Google Scholar
- Kazmi, K.: August 17, 2009, ‘Gunmen Attack Bus at Mine in Indonesian Province of Papua’, IHS Global Insight Daily Analysis, http://global.factiva.com.
- Knauft, B.: 1999, From Primitive to Postcolonial in Melanesia and Anthropology (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) Google Scholar
- Pearlman, J.: November 21, 2009, ‘Death in Papua: Political Intrigue Clouds Miner’s Murder’, Sydney Morning Herald.Google Scholar
- Rankin, A.: January 17, 2006, ‘Mind Who You Call Primitive: The West Papuans Holding a Group of Europeans are Fighting Against Extermination’, The Independent (London).Google Scholar
- Sethi, S. P. (Ed.): 2011, Globalization and Self-Regulation: The Crucial Role that Corporate Codes of Conduct Play in Global Business (Palgrave Macmillan, New York) (book under contract; expected publication date April 2011).Google Scholar
- Staff Reporter: December 22, 2009, ‘Papuans Demand Closure of US Mine in Indonesia’, Daily The Pak Banker.Google Scholar
- Thompson, G.: July 13, 2009, ‘Military, Police ‘Among Suspects’ in Freeport Killings’, Australian Broadcast Corporation. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/13/2623717.htm?section=world.
- United Nations Economic Commission for Africa: February 1, 2007, ‘The 2007 Big Table, Managing Africa’s Natural Resources for Growth and Poverty Reduction’, http://www.uneca.org/thebigtable/documents/2007BigTableSummaryReport.pd