Journal of Business Ethics

, 103:127 | Cite as

Business and Government Ethics in the “New” and “Old” EU: An Empirical Account of Public–Private Value Congruence in Slovenia and the Netherlands

Article

Abstract

This study reports on the hierarchy of organizational values in public and private sector organizations in Slovenia and the Netherlands. We surveyed 400 managers in Slovenia and 382 in the Netherlands using an identical questionnaire on the importance of a selection of values in everyday decision making. In Slovenia, impartiality, incorruptibility, and transparency were rated significantly higher in the public sector, while profitability, obedience, and reliability were rated more important in business organizations. In contrast, in the Netherlands, 11 values differed significantly between the sectors. Thus, a greater value congruence exists between the sectors in Slovenia than in the Netherlands, with a larger “common core” of values in Slovenia (14) compared with the Netherlands (9), just as we hypothesized. Historical and cultural developments, such as the communist rule in Slovenia and the different influences of the Protestant work ethic in both countries, led to more similarities between business and government organizations in the “new” EU member state, Slovenia.

Keywords

organizational values public sector private sector EU business ethics 

References

  1. Adam, F., Jelovac, D., & Rek, M. (2008). Economic cultural (in)compatibility: Old and new EU members in comparison. In D. Podmenik (Ed.). Sociokulturni in organizacijski vidiki prenosa znanja [Sociocultural and organizational aspects of knowledge transfer] (pp. 107-134), Ljubljana: IRSA.Google Scholar
  2. Agle, B. R. & Caldwell, C. B. (1999). Understanding research on values in business. Business & Society, 38(3), 326-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck Jørgensen, T. (2006). Public Values, their Nature, Stability and Change: The Case of Denmark. Public Administration Quarterly 30 (3): 365-398.Google Scholar
  4. Beck Jørgensen, T.B. & Bozeman, B. (2007). The public values universe: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyne, G.A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97-122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Rescuing public management from economic individualism. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  7. de Bruijn, H. & Dicke, W. (2006). Strategies for safeguarding public values in liberalized utility sectors. Public Administration, 84(3), 717–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Graaf, G. & van der Val, Z. (2008). On value differences experienced by sector switchers. Administration & Society, 40(1), 79-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frederickson, H.G. (1997). The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Frederickson, H.G. (2005). Public ethics and the new managerialism: An axiomatic theory. In Frederickson, H.G. & R.K. Ghere (Eds.), Ethics in public management (pp. 165-183). New York & London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  11. Gregory, R. J.: (1999) Social Capital Theory and Administrative Reform: Maintaining Ethical Probity in Public Service. Public Administration Review 59 (1): 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardi Vitorović, N. (2006). Protestantizem v polemikah ob štiristoletnici Trubarjevega rojstva [Protestantism and controversy marking the quatercentenary of Trubar’s birth]. In M. Kerševan (Ed.), Protestantizem, slovenska identiteta in združujoča se Evropa [Protestantism, Slovenian identity and a converging Europe] (pp. 217-263). Ljubljana, Znanstveno-raziskovalni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.Google Scholar
  13. Hemingway, C.A. and Maclagan, P.W. (2004). Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1): 33-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hood, C.C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration 69 (1): 3-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R. & Baker, W. (2000). Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inglehart, R. & Welzel C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jacobs, J. (1992). Systems of survival. A dialogue on the moral foundations of com-merce and politics. New York: Random House Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Jelovac, D. (2000). Podjetniška kultura in etika [Entrepreneurial culture and ethics]. Portorož: Visoka strokovna šola za podjetništvo.Google Scholar
  19. Kaptein, M. (2004) Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say?. Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1): 13-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaptein, M. and Wempe, J. (2002). The balanced company. A theory of corporate integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kernaghan, K. (2000). The post-bureaucratic organization and public service values. International Review of Administrative Sciences 66: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerševan, M. (2006). Uvod [Introduction]. In M. Kerševan (Ed.), Protestantizem, slovenska identiteta in združujoča se Evropa [Protestantism, Slovenian identity and a converging Europe] (pp. 7-12). Ljubljana: Znanstveno-raziskovalni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.Google Scholar
  23. Kerševan, M. (2009). Reformacija, protestantsko krščanstvo in značilnosti moderne družbe [The Reformation, Protestant Christianity and features of modern society]. Stati inu obstati, 9-10, 11-25.Google Scholar
  24. Kuzmič, M. (2006). Švicarska reformacija in njeni vplivi na Slovenskem [The Swiss Reformation and its influence on Slovenia]. In M. KerŠevan (Ed.), Protestantizem, slovenska identiteta in združujoča se Evropa [Protestantism, Slovenian identity and a converging Europe] (pp. 197-216). Ljubljana: Znanstveno-raziskovalni inŠtitut Filozofske fakultete.Google Scholar
  25. Lane, J.E. (1994). Will public management drive out public administration? Asian Journal of Public Administration 16 (2): 139-151.Google Scholar
  26. Maesschalck, J. (2004). The impact of the new public management reforms on public servants’ ethics: Towards a theory. Public Administration 82 (2): 465-489. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Poročilo o razvoju [Development Report 2009]: 2009. Ljubljana: Urad Republike Slovenije za makroekonomske analize in razvoj.Google Scholar
  29. Rus, V. & Toš, N. (2005). Vrednote Slovencev in Evropejcev [Values of Slovenians and Europeans]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.Google Scholar
  30. Schultz, D. (2004). Professional ethics in a postmodern society. Public Integrity 6 (4): 279-297.Google Scholar
  31. Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia: 2003, ‘Rapid Reports’, http://www.stat.sipopis2002/gradivo/si-92.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2010.
  32. Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia: 2010, ‘International Women’s Day 2010’, http://www.stat.si/eng/novica_prikazi.aspx?id=2985. Accessed 22 May 2010.
  33. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  34. Tait, J. (1997). A strong foundation: Report of the task force on public service values and ethics (a summary). Canadian Public Administration 40: 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van der Wal, Z.: 2011, ‘The Content and Context of Organizational Ethics’, Public Administration 89(1) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. van der Wal, Z., de Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? A comparative empirical study on the differences and similarities between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465-482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van der Wal, Z. & Huberts, L. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: Results of an empirical study on public and private sector organizational values. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), 264-285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Wal, Z., Pevkur, A., & Vrangbaek, K. (2008). Public sector value congruence among old and new EU member-states? Empirical evidence from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Estonia. Public Integrity, 10 (4), 317-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Wart, M. (1998). Changing public sector values. New York & London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Vehovar, U. (2009): Vrednote prebivalstva Republike Slovenije in možnosti za nadaljnjo modernizacijo slovenske družbe: Proces retradicionalizacije slovenske družbe kot dejavnik njene modernizacijske blokade [Values of the population of Republic of Slovenia and the potential for further modernisation of Slovenian society: The process of re-traditionalisation of Slovenian society as an obstacle to its modernisation], Raziskave in razprave, 2(3), 3-40.Google Scholar
  41. Weber, M.: 1905/1958, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (Allen and Unwin, Boston).Google Scholar
  42. Weber, M.: 1921/1968, Economy and Society, Translated and Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich (Bedminster Press, New York).Google Scholar
  43. World Development Report 2010: 2010. The World Bank, Washington.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dejan Jelovac
    • 1
  • Zeger van der Wal
    • 2
  • Ana Jelovac
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Business Ethics and Organizational Culture and DevelopmentGea College of EntrepreneurshipLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Department of Governance Studies, Faculty of Social SciencesVU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryTrinity College Dublin & St. Patrick’s University HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations