Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 103, Issue 1, pp 95–110 | Cite as

Nokia Siemens Networks: Just Doing Business – or Supporting an Oppressive Regime?



This case study examines the relevance of taking social and political factors into consideration when a corporation is making a key business decision. In September 2009, Simon Beresford-Wylie, the outgoing CEO of Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN), was reviewing the company’s achievements – while acknowledging the latest public criticism regarding NSN’s business relationship with the Iranian government. In the summer of 2009, NSN was accused of complicity in human rights violations linked to Iran’s presidential election. The company sold network infrastructure and software solutions to the Iranian government, which then used this technology to observe, block, and control domestic communications. Should NSN have acted differently? Students are asked to examine the economic and moral arguments for and against selling products to an oppressive regime that might then use those products to violate human rights. In such a case, does the corporation bear co-responsibility for human rights violations committed by an oppressive regime?


censorship complicity human rights corporate social responsibility Nokia Siemens Networks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amnesty International: 2005, ‘Nigeria: Ten Years on: Injustice and Violence Haunt the oil Delta’, Accessed 23 December 2009.
  2. Amnesty International: 2009, ‘Iran. Election Contested, Repression Compounded’, Accessed 20 January 2010.
  3. Amnesty International: 2009, ‘Iran’s Presidential Election amid Unrest and Ongoing Human Rights Violations’, Accessed 15 Jan- uary 2010.
  4. BBC News: 2003, ‘Iran steps up net censorship’, Accessed 12 January 2010.
  5. BBC News: 2005a, ‘1979: Militants Storm US Embassy in Tehran’, Accessed 15 January 2010.
  6. BBC News: 2005b, ‘The Iran-Iraq War: 25 years on’, Accessed 15 January 2010.
  7. BBC News: 2009, ‘Iran ‘Lifts Block on SMS Texting’’, Accessed 15 January 2010.
  8. BBC News: n.d, Iran: ‘Who Holds the Power?’, Accessed 20 January.
  9. Brenkert, G. G.: 2009, ‘Google, human rights, and moral compromise’, Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4), 453-478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bozorgmehr, N: 2009, ‘Facebook Sets Tone in Iran’s Electoral Contest’. Financial Times, May 13, Accessed 12 January 2010.
  11. Business Insights Ltd: 2008a, ‘The Top Ten Telecom Service Providers. Positioning, Performance and SWOT Analyses’.Google Scholar
  12. Business Insights Ltd: 2008b, ‘The Top 10 Hardware Vendors. Positioning, Performance and SWOT Analyses’.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, T: 2003, ‘Castro Regime Jamming U.S. Broadcasts into Iran’, Washington Times Accessed 10 January 2010.
  14. CBC News: 2009, ‘History of Iran: From Persia to Present’, Accessed 15 January 2010.
  15. Cellan-Jones, R: 2009, ‘Hi-Tech Helps Iranian Monitoring’, BBC News, Accessed 15 January 2010.
  16. Clapham, A. 2006. Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Committee to Protect Journalists: 2000, ‘Spotlight on Press Tyrants: CPJ Names Ten Worst Enemies of the Press’, Accessed 15 January 2010.
  18. Committee to Protect Journalists: 2009, ‘Iran Censors Newspapers amid Unrest’, Accessed 15 January 2010.
  19. Dehghan, S. K.: 2010, ‘Iranian Activist Sues Telecoms Firm over “spying system”’. The Guardian. Accessed 24 September 2010.
  20. Feuilherade, P.: 2002, ‘Iran’s Banned Press Turns to the Net’. BBC News. Accessed 10 January 2010.
  21. Fort, T. L., & Schipani, C. A. 2004. The role of business in fostering peaceful societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gross, D.: 2009, ‘Attacks, Arrests Slowing Online News from Iran’, Accessed 20 January 2010.
  23. Hartmann, J., J. Hildebrand, and P. Jürgens: 2009, Mobilfunk-Lieferung. Nokia Siemens soll Iran bei Zensur geholfen haben. Welt Online, Accessed 22 April 2010.
  24. Human Rights Watch: 1995, ‘Nigeria, the Ogoni Crisis: A Case Study of Military Repression in Southeastern Nigeria’ (New York).Google Scholar
  25. Human Rights Watch: 2005, ‘False Freedom: Online Censorship in the Middle East and Africa’, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  26. Internet World Stats: Iran. Accessed 10 January 2010.
  27. Kamali Dehghan, S.: 2009, ‘Iranian Consumers Boycott Nokia for ‘collaboration’’. The Guardian, Accessed 13 January 2010.
  28. Klein, N.: 2000, No logo (Picador, New York), pp. 279–309.Google Scholar
  29. Lake, E.: 2009, ‘Fed contractor, Cell Phone Maker Sold Spy System to Iran. The Washington Times, Accessed 20 January 2010.
  30. Mackey, B: 2009, ‘A Green Revolution for Iran?’ The New York Times, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  31. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. 2003. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 268-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical con-ceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. 2008. Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Manage-ment Executive Review, 33(3): 750-770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nokia Homepage.: n.d., Accessed 22 April 2010.
  35. Nokia Siemens Networks Homepage: n.d., Accessed 10 March 2010.
  36. OpenNet Initiative: 2005, ‘Country Study: Internet Filtering in Iran in 2004–2005: A Country Study’, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  37. OpenNet Initiative: 2009, ‘Internet Filtering in Iran’, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  38. Proschofsky, A: 2009, ‘Iranische Internet Zensur: Powered by Nokia Siemens?’, Accessed 12 January 2010.
  39. Reporters Sans Frontières: 2004, ‘Iran – Annual Report 2004’, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  40. Reporters Sans Frontières: 2009, ‘Internet Enemies’, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  41. Rhoads, C. and L. Chao: 2009, ‘Iran’s Web Spying Aided By Western Technology’, The Wall Street Journal, Accessed 12 January 2010.
  42. Rooz, A.: 2008, ‘The Big Companies Blocking the Internet in Iran’, Accessed 12 January 2010.
  43. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096-1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siemens Homepage: n.d., Accessed 12 January 2010.
  45. Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. 2004. The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15: 350-363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomik, S.: 2009, ‘Deutsch-finnische Überwachungshilfe’. FAZ NET, April 22. Accessed 20 April 2010.
  47. The Guardian: 2009, ‘Iranian Government Blocks Facebook Access’, Accessed 12 January 2010.
  48. The Washington Post: 2009, ‘Iran Elections: A Twitter Revolution?’, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  49. Washington Times: 2009, ‘Editorial: Iran’s Twitter Revolution. Witnessing a New Chapter in the Quest for Freedom’, Accessed 10 January 2010.
  50. Weissenstein, M. and A. Johnson: 2009, ‘Iranian Girl Shot: Neda Becomes Symbol of Rebellion in Iran’, The Huffington Post, Accessed 24 April 2010.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robins School of BusinessRichmondU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations