Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 1–31 | Cite as

A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce

  • David A. Ralston
  • Carolyn P. Egri
  • Emmanuelle Reynaud
  • Narasimhan Srinivasan
  • Olivier Furrer
  • David Brock
  • Ruth Alas
  • Florian Wangenheim
  • Fidel León Darder
  • Christine Kuo
  • Vojko Potocan
  • Audra I. Mockaitis
  • Erna Szabo
  • Jaime Ruiz Gutiérrez
  • Andre Pekerti
  • Arif Butt
  • Ian Palmer
  • Irina Naoumova
  • Tomasz Lenartowicz
  • Arunas Starkus
  • Vu Thanh Hung
  • Tevfik Dalgic
  • Mario Molteni
  • María Teresa de la Garza Carranza
  • Isabelle Maignan
  • Francisco B. Castro
  • Yong-lin Moon
  • Jane Terpstra-Tong
  • Marina Dabic
  • Yongjuan Li
  • Wade Danis
  • Maria Kangasniemi
  • Mahfooz Ansari
  • Liesl Riddle
  • Laurie Milton
  • Philip Hallinger
  • Detelin Elenkov
  • Ilya Girson
  • Modesta Gelbuda
  • Prem Ramburuth
  • Tania Casado
  • Ana Maria Rossi
  • Malika Richards
  • Cheryl Van Deusen
  • Ping-Ping Fu
  • Paulina Man Kei Wan
  • Moureen Tang
  • Chay-Hoon Lee
  • Ho-Beng Chia
  • Yongquin Fan
  • Alan Wallace
Article

Abstract

This article provides current Schwartz Values Survey (SVS) data from samples of business managers and professionals across 50 societies that are culturally and socioeconomically diverse. We report the society scores for SVS values dimensions for both individual- and societal-level analyses. At the individual-level, we report on the ten circumplex values sub-dimensions and two sets of values dimensions (collectivism and individualism; openness to change, conservation, self-enhancement, and self-transcendence). At the societal-level, we report on the values dimensions of embeddedness, hierarchy, mastery, affective autonomy, intellectual autonomy, egalitarianism, and harmony. For each society, we report the Cronbach’s α statistics for each values dimension scale to assess their internal consistency (reliability) as well as report interrater agreement (IRA) analyses to assess the acceptability of using aggregated individual level values scores to represent country values. We also examined whether societal development level is related to systematic variation in the measurement and importance of values. Thus, the contributions of our evaluation of the SVS values dimensions are two-fold. First, we identify the SVS dimensions that have cross-culturally internally reliable structures and within-society agreement for business professionals. Second, we report the society cultural values scores developed from the twenty-first century data that can be used as macro-level predictors in multilevel and single-level international business research.

Keywords

Cultural values International management Schwartz Values Survey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bello, D., Leung, K., Radebaugh, L., Tung, R., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2009). From the editors: Student samples in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, M. H., & Chi, V. M.-Y. (1997). Values and moral behavior in mainland China. Psychologia, 40, 251–264.Google Scholar
  4. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 92, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, R. D., & Hauenstein, N. M. A. (2005). Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to RWG indices. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devos, T., Spini, D., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doran, C. (2009). The role of personal values in fair trade consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feather, N. T. (2004). Value correlates of ambivalent attitude toward gender relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fischer, R. (2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: A classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, R. (2009). Where is culture in cross cultural research? An outline of a multilevel research process for measuring culture as a shared meaning system. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer, R., & Mansell, A. (2009). Commitment across cultures: A meta-analytical approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1339–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer, R., Smith, P. B., Richey, B., Ferreira, M. C., Assmar, E. M. L., Maes, J., et al. (2007). How do organizations allocate rewards? The predictive validity of national values, economic and organizational factors across six nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, R., Vauclair, C.-M., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Are individual-level and country-level value structures different? Testing Hofstede’s legacy with the Schwartz Value Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 417–433.Google Scholar
  15. Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: Distinguishing sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsyth, D., O’Boyle, E., & McDaniel, M. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigation of cultural variations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 813–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franke, G. R., & Nadler, S. S. (2008). Culture, economic development, and national ethical attitudes. Journal of Business Research, 61, 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2003). Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 1899–1919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. (2010). The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1339–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Husted, B. W. (1999). Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Husted, B. W. (2000). The impact of national culture on software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Husted, B. W. (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental performance. Management International Review, 45(3), 349–371.Google Scholar
  28. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, T., Kulesa, P., Llc, I., Cho, Y. I., & Shavitt, S. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 264–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knafo, A., Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2011). The value of values in cross-cultural research: A special issue in honor of Shalom Schwartz. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LeBreton, J. M., Senter, J. L., & Jenell, L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, J., Moy, J., Lam, K., & Chris Chu, W. L. (2008). Institutional pillars and corruption at the societal level. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Culture, law, and corporate governance. International Review of Law and Economics, 25, 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 659–688.Google Scholar
  37. Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2010). Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2009. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
  38. Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1401–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118.Google Scholar
  40. Ng, S. I., Lee, J. A., & Soutar, G. N. (2007). Are Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s value frameworks congruent? International Marketing Review, 24, 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parboteeah, K. P., Bronson, J. W., & Cullen, J. B. (2005). Does national culture affect willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors? A focus on the GLOBE national culture scheme. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peng, Y.-S., & Lin, S.-S. (2009). National culture, economic development, population growth and environmental performance: The mediating role of education. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perrinjaquet, A., Furrer, O., Usunier, J.-C., Cestre, G., & Valette-Florence, P. (2007). A test of the quasi-circumplex structure of human values. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 820–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peterson, M. F., & Castro, S. L. (2006). Measurement metrics at aggregate levels of analysis: Implications for organization culture research and the GLOBE project. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prince-Gibson, E., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Value priorities and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ralston, D. A. (2008). The crossvergence perspective: Reflections and projections. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 27–40.Google Scholar
  49. Ralston, D. A., Holt, D. A., Terpstra, R. H., & Yu, K. C. (2008). The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rokeach, M. (1967). Values survey. Sunnyvale, CA: Halgren Tests.Google Scholar
  51. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sawyerr, O. O., Strauss, J., & Yan, J. (2005). Individual value structure and diversity attitudes: The moderating effects of age, gender, race, and religiosity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 498–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007). Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franek, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  59. Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e Comportamento nas Organizações (pp. 56–95). Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
  62. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Culture matters: National value cultures, sources and consequences. In R. S. Wyer, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 127–150). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18(2), 386–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwartz, S. H., & Ros, M. (1995). Values in the west: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 91–122.Google Scholar
  70. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 465–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shafer, W., Fukukawa, K., & Lee, G. (2007). Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spini, E. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz value survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. (2010). Negative practice–value correlations in the GLOBE data: Unexpected findings, questionnaire limitations and research directions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1330–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tung, R. L., & Verbeke, A. (2010). Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1259–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Ralston
    • 1
  • Carolyn P. Egri
    • 2
  • Emmanuelle Reynaud
    • 3
  • Narasimhan Srinivasan
    • 4
  • Olivier Furrer
    • 5
  • David Brock
    • 6
  • Ruth Alas
    • 7
  • Florian Wangenheim
    • 8
  • Fidel León Darder
    • 9
  • Christine Kuo
    • 10
  • Vojko Potocan
    • 11
  • Audra I. Mockaitis
    • 12
  • Erna Szabo
    • 13
  • Jaime Ruiz Gutiérrez
    • 14
  • Andre Pekerti
    • 15
  • Arif Butt
    • 16
  • Ian Palmer
    • 17
  • Irina Naoumova
    • 18
  • Tomasz Lenartowicz
    • 19
  • Arunas Starkus
    • 20
  • Vu Thanh Hung
    • 21
  • Tevfik Dalgic
    • 22
  • Mario Molteni
    • 23
  • María Teresa de la Garza Carranza
    • 24
  • Isabelle Maignan
    • 25
  • Francisco B. Castro
    • 26
  • Yong-lin Moon
    • 27
  • Jane Terpstra-Tong
    • 28
  • Marina Dabic
    • 29
  • Yongjuan Li
    • 30
  • Wade Danis
    • 31
  • Maria Kangasniemi
    • 32
  • Mahfooz Ansari
    • 33
  • Liesl Riddle
    • 34
  • Laurie Milton
    • 35
  • Philip Hallinger
    • 36
  • Detelin Elenkov
    • 37
  • Ilya Girson
    • 38
  • Modesta Gelbuda
    • 39
  • Prem Ramburuth
    • 40
  • Tania Casado
    • 41
  • Ana Maria Rossi
    • 42
  • Malika Richards
    • 43
  • Cheryl Van Deusen
    • 44
  • Ping-Ping Fu
    • 45
  • Paulina Man Kei Wan
    • 46
  • Moureen Tang
    • 46
  • Chay-Hoon Lee
    • 47
  • Ho-Beng Chia
    • 48
  • Yongquin Fan
    • 49
  • Alan Wallace
    • 50
  1. 1.University of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  3. 3.IAE d’Aix-en-ProvenceAix en Provence Cedex 2France
  4. 4.University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  5. 5.Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Ben-Gurion UniversityBeershebaIsrael
  7. 7.Estonia Business SchoolTallinnEstonia
  8. 8.Technische Universitaet MuenchenMunichGermany
  9. 9.University of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  10. 10.Yuan-Ze UniversityJhongli CityTaiwan
  11. 11.University of MariborMariborSlovenia
  12. 12.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  13. 13.Johannes Kepler UniversitätLinzAustria
  14. 14.Universidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
  15. 15.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  16. 16.Lahore University of Management SciencesLahorePakistan
  17. 17.University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  18. 18.University of HartfordWest HartfordUSA
  19. 19.Florida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  20. 20.CIBER-VilniusVilniusLithuania
  21. 21.National Economics UniversityHanoiVietnam
  22. 22.University of DallasIrvingUSA
  23. 23.Catholic University of MilanMilanItaly
  24. 24.Instituto Tecnológico de CelayaCelayaMexico
  25. 25.VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  26. 26.CEMPRE-Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  27. 27.Seoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  28. 28.Monash UniversityPetaling JayaMalaysia
  29. 29.University of ZagrebCity of ZagrebCroatia
  30. 30.Chinese Academy of ScienceBeijingChina
  31. 31.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  32. 32.University of KuopioKuopioFinland
  33. 33.University of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada
  34. 34.George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  35. 35.University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  36. 36.Hong Kong Institute of EducationHong KongChina
  37. 37.University of TennesseeNashvilleUSA
  38. 38.University of WestminsterWestminsterUK
  39. 39.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  40. 40.University of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia
  41. 41.University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  42. 42.Clinica De Stress E BiofeedbackPorto AlegreBrazil
  43. 43.Pennsylvania State University—BerksReadingUSA
  44. 44.University of North FloridaJacksonvilleUSA
  45. 45.Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  46. 46.Lingnan UniversityLingnanHong Kong
  47. 47.Keppel Offshore and MarineSingaporeSingapore
  48. 48.National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  49. 49.Nanjing Technical UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  50. 50.Grand JunctionUSA

Personalised recommendations