Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 102, Issue 3, pp 439–454 | Cite as

The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing and Marketing Ethics

  • John Williams
  • Robert Aitken
Article

Abstract

Abela and Murphy (J Acad Mark Sci 36(1):39–53, 2007) examined Service-Dominant (S-D) logic (Vargo and Lusch, J Mark 68(1):1–17, 2004) from the viewpoint of Marketing Ethics and concluded that whilst S-D logic does not have explicit ethical content, the Foundational Premises (FPs) of S-D logic do have implicit ethical content. They also conclude that what may be needed to make the implicit more explicit is the addition of another FP. The aim of this article is to explore whether S-D logic needs to be modified, if one wishes to construct a theoretical framework for analysis of Marketing that has ethical considerations fully integrated. We critically evaluate the claim that the FPs are inherently ethical and conclude that S-D logic should be modified. We offer an additional FP for consideration that relates to the role of personal and societal values in the co-creation of value. This FP is necessary because of the role that the ethical positions of actors play in exchange behaviour. However, it should be pointed out that whilst the article explores the ethical potential of S-D logic it does not privilege any particular ethical position or code. These concerns will be addressed in subsequent articles: the aim here is to establish the underlying rationale for including an explicit commitment to ethics in S-D logic.

Keywords

S-D logic Resource-Advantage theory ethics values co-creation of value 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abela, A. V., and P. E. Murphy: 2007, ‘Marketing with Integrity: Ethics and the Service-Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(1), 39–53. doi: 10.1007/s11747-007-0062-0.
  2. Aitken, R., D. Ballantyne, P. Osborne, J. Williams (2006) Introduction to the special issue on the service-dominant logic of marketing: insights from The Otago Forum. Marketing Theory 6(3):275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amit, R., and P.J. H. Shoemaker. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14, no. 1: 33-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, Jay B. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17, no. 1: 99-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, Jay B. 1992. Integrating Organizational Behavior and Strategy Formulation Research: A Resource-based Analysis. In Advances in Strategic Management, ed. P Shrivivasta, A. S. Hugg, and J. E. Dutton, 39-61. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bastiat, Frédérick. 1860. Harmonies of Political Economy. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
  7. Beatty, Sharon, Lynn Kahle, Pamela Homer, and Shekar Misra. 1985. Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values and the Rokeach Value Survey. Psychology and Marketing 2: 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, Archie B, Ann K. Buchholtz (2006) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. 6th ed Thomson.Google Scholar
  9. Conner, K.R., and C.K. Prahalad. 1996. A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism. Organization Science 7, no. 5: 477-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Constantin, James A., and Robert F. Lusch. 1994. Understanding Resource Management. Oxford, OH: The Planning Forum.Google Scholar
  11. Crane, A., and J. Desmond. 2002. Social Marketing and Morality. European Journal of Marketing 36, no. 5: 548 - 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donaldson, Thomas, and Thomas W. Dunfee. 1999. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  13. Durgee, J. F., G. Colarelli O’Connor, and R. Veryzer. 1996. Observations: Translating Values Into Product Wants. Journal of Advertising Research 36, no. 6: 90–99.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  16. Gummeson, Evert. 2006. Many-to-Many Marketing as Grand Theory: A Nordic School Contribution. In The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, And Directions, ed. Robert F. Lusch and Stephen L. Vargo, 339-353. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  17. Hunt, Shelby D. 1986. A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6: 5-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt, Shelby D 1999. The strategic imperative and sustainable competitive advantage: Public policy implications of resource-advantage theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27, no. 2: 144-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt, S. D. 2000. A General Theory of Competition. In N. K. Malhotra (Ed) Marketing for a New Century. Thousand Oaks: SageGoogle Scholar
  20. Ip, Po-Keung. 2010. Business Ethics and the Well-Being of Nations-Is There a Connection? Journal of Business Ethics 95: 97-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamakura, Wagner A., and Thomas P. Novak. 1992. Value-System Segmentation: Exploring the Meaning of LOV. The Journal of Consumer Research 19, no. 1 (June): 119-132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotler, Philip. 1976. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control. 3rd ed. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Kotler, Philip, Linden Brown, Sue Burton, Ken Deans, and Gary Armstrong. 2010. Marketing. 8th ed. Frenchs Forest: Pearson.Google Scholar
  24. Kotler, Philip, and S. J. Levy. 1969. Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing 33, no. 1: 10-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laczniak, Gene R. 2006. Some societal and ethical dimensions of the service-dominant logic perspective of marketing. In The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, And Directions, ed. Robert F. Lusch and Stephen L. Vargo, 279 - 285. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  26. Laczniak, Gene R., and Patrick E. Murphy. 1993. Ethical Marketing Decisions. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Laczniak, Gene R., and Patrick E. Murphy. 2006. Normative Perspectives for Ethical and Socially Responsible Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing 26 2: 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lusch, Robert F. 2006. The Small and Long View. Journal of Macromarketing 26, no. 2 (December 1): 240 -244. doi: 10.1177/0276146706291045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lusch, Robert F., and Stephen L. Vargo. 2006a. Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory 6(3):281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusch, Robert F., and Stephen L. Vargo. 2006b. Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for a General Theory. In The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing. Dialog, Debate, and Directions, Armonk/London, ed. Robert F. Lusch and Stephen L. Vargo, 406-420. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  31. Lusch, Robert F., and Stephen L. Vargo. 2006c. The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  32. Lusch, Robert F., Stephen L. Vargo, and M. O’Brien. 2007. Competing through service: Insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing 83, no. 1: 5-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Normann, Richard, and Rafael Ramírez. 1993. From Value Chain to Value Constellation. Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review 71: 65-77.Google Scholar
  34. Penrose, Edith Tilton. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Ramírez, Rafael. 1999. Value Co-Production: Intellectual Origins and Implications for Practice and Research. Strategic Management Journal 20: 49-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rokeach, Milton J. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schlegelmilch, Bodo. 1998. Marketing Ethics: An International Perspective. London: Thomson.Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz, Shalom H. 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In aesp, ed. Mark P. Zanna. Vol. 25. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, N. Craig, and John A. Quelch. 1987. Ethics in Marketing. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Vargo, Stephen L. 2007. Paradigms, Pluralisms, and Peripheries: On the Assessment of the S-D Logic. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 15(1): 105-108. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3582(07)70037-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vargo, Stephen L. 2008. Customer Integration and Value Creation: Paradigmatic Traps and Perspectives. Journal of Service Research 11(2): 211-215. doi: 10.1177/1094670508324260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vargo, S. L. and R. F. Lusch: 2004, ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 68(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036.
  43. Vargo, Stephen L., and Robert F. Lusch. 2008. Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6, (March 1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vargo, Stephen L., Paul P. Maglio, and Melissa Archpru Akaka. 2008. On value and value co-creation: A service systems approach. European Management Journal 26: 145-152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing, School of BusinessUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations