The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing and Marketing Ethics
Abela and Murphy (J Acad Mark Sci 36(1):39–53, 2007) examined Service-Dominant (S-D) logic (Vargo and Lusch, J Mark 68(1):1–17, 2004) from the viewpoint of Marketing Ethics and concluded that whilst S-D logic does not have explicit ethical content, the Foundational Premises (FPs) of S-D logic do have implicit ethical content. They also conclude that what may be needed to make the implicit more explicit is the addition of another FP. The aim of this article is to explore whether S-D logic needs to be modified, if one wishes to construct a theoretical framework for analysis of Marketing that has ethical considerations fully integrated. We critically evaluate the claim that the FPs are inherently ethical and conclude that S-D logic should be modified. We offer an additional FP for consideration that relates to the role of personal and societal values in the co-creation of value. This FP is necessary because of the role that the ethical positions of actors play in exchange behaviour. However, it should be pointed out that whilst the article explores the ethical potential of S-D logic it does not privilege any particular ethical position or code. These concerns will be addressed in subsequent articles: the aim here is to establish the underlying rationale for including an explicit commitment to ethics in S-D logic.
KeywordsS-D logic Resource-Advantage theory ethics values co-creation of value
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abela, A. V., and P. E. Murphy: 2007, ‘Marketing with Integrity: Ethics and the Service-Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 36(1), 39–53. doi: 10.1007/s11747-007-0062-0.
- Barney, Jay B. 1992. Integrating Organizational Behavior and Strategy Formulation Research: A Resource-based Analysis. In Advances in Strategic Management, ed. P Shrivivasta, A. S. Hugg, and J. E. Dutton, 39-61. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Bastiat, Frédérick. 1860. Harmonies of Political Economy. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
- Carroll, Archie B, Ann K. Buchholtz (2006) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. 6th ed Thomson.Google Scholar
- Constantin, James A., and Robert F. Lusch. 1994. Understanding Resource Management. Oxford, OH: The Planning Forum.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, Thomas, and Thomas W. Dunfee. 1999. Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Durgee, J. F., G. Colarelli O’Connor, and R. Veryzer. 1996. Observations: Translating Values Into Product Wants. Journal of Advertising Research 36, no. 6: 90–99.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
- Gummeson, Evert. 2006. Many-to-Many Marketing as Grand Theory: A Nordic School Contribution. In The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, And Directions, ed. Robert F. Lusch and Stephen L. Vargo, 339-353. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Hunt, S. D. 2000. A General Theory of Competition. In N. K. Malhotra (Ed) Marketing for a New Century. Thousand Oaks: SageGoogle Scholar
- Kotler, Philip. 1976. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control. 3rd ed. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Kotler, Philip, Linden Brown, Sue Burton, Ken Deans, and Gary Armstrong. 2010. Marketing. 8th ed. Frenchs Forest: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Laczniak, Gene R. 2006. Some societal and ethical dimensions of the service-dominant logic perspective of marketing. In The Service-dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, And Directions, ed. Robert F. Lusch and Stephen L. Vargo, 279 - 285. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Laczniak, Gene R., and Patrick E. Murphy. 1993. Ethical Marketing Decisions. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Lusch, Robert F., and Stephen L. Vargo. 2006b. Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for a General Theory. In The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing. Dialog, Debate, and Directions, Armonk/London, ed. Robert F. Lusch and Stephen L. Vargo, 406-420. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Lusch, Robert F., and Stephen L. Vargo. 2006c. The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Normann, Richard, and Rafael Ramírez. 1993. From Value Chain to Value Constellation. Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review 71: 65-77.Google Scholar
- Penrose, Edith Tilton. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Rokeach, Milton J. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Schlegelmilch, Bodo. 1998. Marketing Ethics: An International Perspective. London: Thomson.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, Shalom H. 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In aesp, ed. Mark P. Zanna. Vol. 25. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, N. Craig, and John A. Quelch. 1987. Ethics in Marketing. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Vargo, S. L. and R. F. Lusch: 2004, ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 68(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.220.127.116.1136.