Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 102, Issue 2, pp 193–219 | Cite as

Critical Events in the Ethics of U.S. Corporation History

Article

Abstract

The history of corporations in the United States (U.S.) is much older than the country, as it must be understood in the context of the history of peoples of Europe who eventually dominated the North American continent in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. These European settlers came, in part, to achieve economic prosperity for themselves and, in many cases, for early forerunners of the modern corporation. These business organizations had predecessors in Europe millennia earlier as ancient Romans had developed a functional and successful form of corporation for the purpose of conducting commerce in the Roman Empire. In the decades that followed the founding of the U.S. in 1776, corporations evolved from rare, small, closely controlled business organizations with a multitude of restrictions to very large, very powerful modern institutions that enjoy many of the legal rights of humans. With this evolution came ethical issues, as (1) the ethical distance was altered between corporate decision-makers and those affected by those decisions, and (2) many of the legal rights of individual humans were extended, through litigation, to corporations. This article explains the historical development of the U.S. corporation and identifies 20 Critical Events in the Ethics of Corporation History (CEECH). An understanding of these historical events may facilitate comprehension of many of the current ethical issues associated with a legal organizational form that profoundly affects business and society.

Keywords

corporation ethics history personhood regulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson R.: 2005, ‘Moral Distance: What Do We Owe to Unknown Strangers?’, Philosophical Forum 36(1):31-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aljalian, N.N.: 1999, ‘Fourteenth Amendment Personhood: Fact or Fiction?’, St. John’s Law Review 73(2), 1-42.Google Scholar
  3. Amar, A.R.: 1998, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (Yale University Press, New Haven).Google Scholar
  4. Bakan, J.: 2004, The Corporation (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  5. Berle, A.A.: 1964, ‘Economic Power and the Free Society’, in A. Hacker (ed.), The Corporation Takeover (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  6. Bernheim, A.L.: 1937, Big Business: Its Growth and Its Place (Twentieth Century Fund, New York).Google Scholar
  7. Bierman, H.: 2010 ‘The 1929 Stock Market Crash’, EH.Net Encyclopedia, http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/Bierman.Crash, 2 April 2010.
  8. Bravin, J.: 2009, ‘Sotomayor Issues Challenge to a Century of Corporate Law’, Wall Street Journal September 17, A19.Google Scholar
  9. Bunting, D.: 1986, The Rise of Large American Corporations, 1889-1919 (Garland Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
  10. Center for Responsive Politics: 2010 ‘Top All-Time Donors’, Center for Responsive Politics Website, http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php, 12 March 2010.
  11. Charnovitz, S.: 2010 ‘Addressing Environmental and Labor Issues in the World Trade Organization’, Progressive Policy Institute Website, http://www.ppionline.org, 4 February 2010.
  12. Chatterjee, D.K.: 2003, ‘Moral Distance: Introduction’, The Monist 86(3), 327-332.Google Scholar
  13. Columbo, R.J.: 2008, ‘Ownership, Limited: Reconciling Traditional and Progressive Corporate Law via an Aristotelian Understanding of Ownership’, Journal of Corporation Law 34(1), 248-292.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, P., Brammer, S., and Millington, A.: 2004, ‘An Empirical Examination of Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 27-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Craven, W. F.: 1997, The Virginia Company of London, 1606–1624 (Genealogical Publishing Company, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  16. Delaware State Government Website: 2010, http://www.corp.delaware.gov/aboutagency.shtml, 12 March 2010.
  17. Derber, C.: 1998, Corporation Nation (St. Martin’s Press, New York).Google Scholar
  18. Engerman, S.L.: 1972, ‘Some Economic Issues Relating to Railroad Subsidies and the Evaluation of Land Grants’, The Journal of Economic History 32(2), 443-463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine September 13, 4–9.Google Scholar
  20. Fritzche, D.J.: 1991, ‘A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(11), 841-852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galambos, L.: 1975, The Public Image of Big Business in America, 1880-1940 (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  22. Gepken-Jager, E. and Van Solinge, G.: 2005, VOC 1602-2002: 400 Years of Company Law (Kluwer, Deventer).Google Scholar
  23. Griffin, J.M., Harris, J.H., and Topaloglu, S.: 2003, ‘The Dynamics of Institutional and Individual Trading’, Journal of Finance 58(6), 2285-2230.Google Scholar
  24. Grossman, W. and Schoenfeldt, L.F.: 2001, ‘Resolving Ethical Dilemmas through International Human Resource Management: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective’, Human Resource Management Review 11, 55-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grubbs, K.E.: 1998, ‘Profits and Prophets’, World Trade 11(3), 96.Google Scholar
  26. Hacker, A.: 1964, ‘Corporate America’, in A. Hacker (ed.), The Corporation Takeover (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  27. Hartman, T.: 2002, Unequal Protection (Rodale, Kutztown).Google Scholar
  28. Internal Revenue Service: 2010, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/00cosec3.pdf, 20 April 2010.
  29. Iyer, A.A.: 2006, ‘The Missing Dynamic: Corporations, Individuals and Contracts’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(4), 393-406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James, H.S. and Rassekh, F.: 2000, ‘Smith, Friedman, and Self-Interest in Ethical Society’, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(3), 659-674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamani, A.: 2010 ‘The Case Against Corporate Social Responsibility’, Wall Street Journal August 23, R1.Google Scholar
  32. Kaysen, C.: 1996, ‘Introduction and Overview’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  33. Kochan, T.A.: 1996, ‘The American Corporation as an Employer: Past, Present, and Future Possibilities’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  34. Kuschnik, B.: 2008, ‘The Sarbanes Oxley Act: “Big Brother is Watching You” or Adequate Measures of Corporate Governance’, Rutgers Business Law Journal 5(1), 64-95.Google Scholar
  35. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W.: 1998, ‘Law and Finance’, The Journal of Political Economy 106(6), 1113-1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levy, L.W.: 2001, Origins of the Bill of Rights (Yale University Press, New Haven).Google Scholar
  37. Liptak, A.: 2010, ‘Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit’, New York Times January 21, A1.Google Scholar
  38. Manne, H. G.: 2008, ‘Milton Friedman Was Right’, Wall Street Journal November 24, A12.Google Scholar
  39. Manning, R.C.: 1984, ‘Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood’, Journal of Business Ethics, 3(1), 77-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayer, C.J.: 1990, ‘Personalizing the Impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights’, Hastings Law Journal, 41(3), 577-667.Google Scholar
  41. McCraw, T.K.: 1988, ‘The Evolution of the Corporation in the United States’, in J.R. Meyer and J.M. Gustafson (eds.), The U.S, Business Corporation: An Institution in Transition (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
  42. Mellema, G.: 2003, ‘Responsibility, Taint, and Ethical Distance in Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 47(2), 125-132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A.: 2003, The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
  44. Mirowski, P.: 1981, ‘The Rise (and Retreat) of a Market: English Joint Stock Shares in the Eighteenth Century’, The Journal of Economic History 41(3), 559-577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nace, T.: 2003, Gangs of America: the Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  46. National Constitution Center: 2010, http://www.constitutioncenter.org/timeline/, 3 April 2010.
  47. Nederman, C.U.: 1987, ‘Sovereignty, War, and the Corporation: Hegel on the Medieval Foundations of the Modern State’, The Journal of Politics 49(2), 500-520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newmyer, R.K.: 2001, John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court (Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge).Google Scholar
  49. Owens, R.N.: 1951, Business Organization and Combination (Prentice Hall, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Pfeiffer, R.S.: 1990, ‘The Central Distinction in the Theory of Corporate Moral Personhood’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 473-480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Purcell, N.: 1985, ‘Wine and Wealth in Ancient Italy’, The Journal of Roman Studies 75, 1-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reader, S.: 2003, ‘Distance, Relationship and Moral Obligation’, The Monist 86(3), 367-381.Google Scholar
  53. Robertson, J.O.: 1985, America’s Business (Hill and Wang, New York).Google Scholar
  54. Roe, M.J.: 1996, ‘From Antitrust to Corporation Governance? The Corporation and the Law: 1959-1994’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  55. Royden, H.: 1989, ‘The Tenure of Office of the Quinquennales in the Roman Professional Collegia’, The American Journal of Philology 110(2), 303-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Silver, D.: 2005, ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct and the Value of Autonomy’, Journal of Business Ethics 59, 3-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, A.: 1910, The Wealth of Nations (Dent, London).Google Scholar
  58. Smith, G.D. and Dyer, D.: 1996, ‘The Rise and Transformation of the American Corporation’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  59. Tedlow, R.S.: 1991, The Rise of the American Business Corporation (Harwood Academic Publishers, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  60. Thurow, L.: 1996, ‘Almost Everywhere: Surging Inequality and Falling Real Wages’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  61. U.S. Census Bureau: 1890, Report on Transportation Business in the United States at the Eleventh Census (U.S. Federal Government, Washington).Google Scholar
  62. Wheeler, S.: 2002, Corporations and the Third Way (Hart Publishing, Oxford).Google Scholar
  63. Willan, T.S.: 1956, The Early History of the Russia Company, 1553-1603 (Manchester University Press, Manchester).Google Scholar
  64. Williams, C.A.: 1999, ‘The Securities and Exchange Commission and Corporate Social Transparency’, Harvard Law Review 112(6), 1197-1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zyglidopoulos, S.C. and Fleming, P.J.: 2008, ‘Ethical Distance in Corrupt Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(2), 265-274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations