Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 99, Issue 1, pp 51–62

An Integrated Model of Humanistic Management



This conceptual paper analyses the arguments which have been made in favour of a transition towards humanistic management. In order to reconcile economic as well as moral arguments an integrative model of humanistic management is presented. This model outlines prospective lines of empirical research especially in the area where business conduct is profitable but not humanistic.

Key words

humanistic management human dignity business case moral case 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arena, C.: 2006, The High-Purpose Company (Harper Collins, New York).Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J. E: (2006) ‘Social Entrepreneurship: It’s for Corporations, Too’, In: A. Nicholls (eds.), Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York, 169-180.Google Scholar
  3. Basu, K. and G. Palazzo: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking’, Academy of Management Review 33(1), 122-136.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. and T. Luckmann: 1966, The social construction of reality (Penguin Books, London).Google Scholar
  5. Birsch, D. and J. H.Fielder: 1994, The Ford Pinto case: a study in applied ethics, business, and technology (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
  6. Brown, L. D. and S. Jagadananda: 2007, Civil Society Legitimacy and Accountability: Issues and Challenges (CIVICUS and the Hauser Center, Boston).Google Scholar
  7. Chandler, G.: 2002, ‘Let’s Not Fool Each Other with the Business Case’, Ethical Performance 4(1).Google Scholar
  8. Choi, J. M., J. W. Murphy and M. J. Caro: 2004, Globalization with a human face (Praeger, Westport, Conn.).Google Scholar
  9. Currall, S. C. and M. J. Epstein: 2003, ‘The Fragility of Organizational Trust - Lessons from the Rise and Fall of Enron’, Organizational Dynamics 32(2), 193-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dierksmeier, C. and M. Pirson: 2009, ‘Oikonomia Versus Chrematistike: Learning from Aristotle About the Future Orientation of Business Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 88(3), 417-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1988. ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, In T. C. Beauchamp, E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 97-106.Google Scholar
  13. Fontrodona, J. and A. J. G. Sison: 2006, ‘The Nature of the Firm, Agency Theory and Shareholder Theory: A Critique from Philosophical Anthropology’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 33-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic management a stakeholder approach (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times 13(September), 32–33.Google Scholar
  16. Gioia, D. A.: 2002, ‘Business education’s role in the crisis of corporate confidence’, Academy of Management Executive 16(3), 142-144.Google Scholar
  17. Gioia, D. A.: 2003, ‘Teaching Teachers to Teach Corporate Governance Differently’, Journal of Management & Governance 7(3), 255-262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gond, J. P., G. Palazzo and K. Basu: 2007, ‘Investigating Instrumental Corporate Social Responsibility through the Mafia Methphor’, Research Paper Series No. 48-2007, Nottingham University.Google Scholar
  19. Goshal, S.: 2003, ‘Business Schools Share the Blame for Enron’, Financial Times 17(July), p. 33.Google Scholar
  20. Goshal, S.: 2005, ‘Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices’, Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1), 75-91.Google Scholar
  21. Granovetter, M.: 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481-510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greyser, S. A.: 1982, Johnson & Johnson: The Tylenol Tragedy, HBS Case Study (HBS, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, J.: 1984, Theory of Communicative Action (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  24. Hartman, C. L. and E. R. Stafford: 2006, ‘Chilling with Greenpeace – From the Inside Out’, Stanford Social Innovation Review (Summer), 54–59.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, B.: 1995, ‘Ethical Banking: The Case of the Co-operative Bank’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(12), 1005-1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haugh, H.: 2007, ‘New Strategies for a Sustainable Society: The growing Contribution of Social Entrepreneurship’, Business Ethics Quarterly 17(4), 743-749.Google Scholar
  27. Holliday, C. O., S. Schmidheiny and P. Watts: 2002, Walking the talk - The business case for sustainable development (Greenleaf, Sheffield).Google Scholar
  28. Husock, H.: 2006, Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank, HBS Case Study (HBS, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  29. John, L.: 1991, ‘Bhopal: An essay on moral responsibility and civic virtue’, Journal of Social Philosophy 22(1), 73-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, G. and R. Reisen de Pinho: 2007, Natura: Global Beauty Made in Brazil, HBS Case Study (HBS, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  31. Kädtler, J. (2001) ‘Social Movements and Interest Groups as Triggers for Organizational Learning’, In: M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, I. Nonaka (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford University Press: New York, 221-241.Google Scholar
  32. Kant, I.: 1997, Critique of practical reason, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York).Google Scholar
  33. Kant, I.: 2003 [1795], Zum ewigen Frieden ein philosophischer Entwurf, (Reclam, Stuttgart).Google Scholar
  34. Karnani, A.: 2007a, ‘Doing well by doing good - case study: Fair & Lovely™ whitening cream’, Strategic Management Journal 28(13), 1351-1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karnani, A.: 2007b, ‘The Mirage of Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid: How the Private Sector can Alleviate Poverty’, California Management Review 49(4), 90-111.Google Scholar
  36. Karnani, A.: 2009, ‘Romanticizing the Poor’, Stanford Social Innovation Review 7(1), 38-43.Google Scholar
  37. Keeble, J. and Turner, C.: 2003, ‘The Business Case for Corporate Responsibility’, Arthur D. Little and Business in the Community, Cambridge, London.Google Scholar
  38. Letelier, M. F., F. Flores and C. Spinosa: 2003, ‘Developing Productive Customers in Emerging Markets’, California Management Review 45(4), 77-103.Google Scholar
  39. Livesey, S. M.: 2001, ‘Eco-Identity as Discursive Struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria’, The Journal of Business Communication 38(1), 58-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Livesey, S. M.: 2002, ‘Global Warming Wars: Rhetorical and Discourse Analytic Approaches to ExxonMobil’s Corporate Public Discourse’, The Journal of Business Communication 39(1), 117-148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Livesey S. M., K. Kearins (2002) ‘Transparent and Caring Corporations?’ Organization & Environment 15(3), 233-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Llano, A., R. Alvira, T. Calleja, M. Bastons and C. Martinez Esteruelas: 1992, El humanismo en la empresa (Rialp, Madrid).Google Scholar
  43. Lloyd, R., S. Warren and M. Hammer: 2008, 2008 Global Accountability Report, London.Google Scholar
  44. Luhmann, N.: 1971. ‘Öffentliche Meinung’, in N. Luhmann (eds.), Politische Planung, (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen), pp. 9-34.Google Scholar
  45. Mair, J., J. Robinson and K. Hockerts: 2006, Social entrepreneurship (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Margolis, J. D. and J. P. Walsh: 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2), 268-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin, R. L. and S. Osberg: 2007, ‘Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition’, Stanford Social Innovation Review (Spring), 29–39.Google Scholar
  48. Mattocks, R.: 2008, Zone of insolvency: how nonprofits avoid hidden liabilities & build financial strength, (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.).Google Scholar
  49. McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows and J. Randers: 1992, Beyond the limits: global collapse or a sustainable future (Earthscan Publications, London).Google Scholar
  51. Melé, D.: 2003a, ‘The Challenge of Humanistic Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 44(1), 77-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Melé, D.: 2003b, ‘Organizational Humanizing Cultures: Do They Generate Social Capital?’ Journal of Business Ethics 45(1/2):3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Melé, D.: 2008, ‘Integrating Ethics into Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(3), 291-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Melé, D.: 2009, ‘Editorial Introduction: Towards a More Humanistic Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 88(3), 413-416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Natura: 2009, ‘Natura Annual Report 2008’, Cajamar.Google Scholar
  56. Nicholls, A.: 2006, Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, (Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York).Google Scholar
  57. N.N.: 2006, Líder de mercado de cosméticos brasileño apunta a internacionalización, El Mercurio, 8(October).Google Scholar
  58. Olsen, M. and E. Boxenbaum: 2009, ‘Bottom-of-the-Pyramid: Organizational Barriers to Implementation’, California Management Review 51(4), 100-125.Google Scholar
  59. Orlitzky, M. and F. L. Schmidt: 2003, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis’, Organization Studies 24(3), 403-411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orr, D. W.: 2004, Earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect (Island Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  61. Oser F (1994) ‘Moral Perspectives on Teaching’, In: F. Darling-Hammond (eds.), Review of Research in Education. American Educational Research Association, Washington, 57-127.Google Scholar
  62. Pirson M (2009) ‘Social Entrepreneurship: A Blueprint for Humane Organizations?’ In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, von E. Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 248-259.Google Scholar
  63. Porritt, J.: 2003, The World in Context: Beyond the Business Case for Sustainable Development (HRH The Prince of Wale’s Business and The Environment Programme, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  64. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review (December) 80(12), 3–14.Google Scholar
  65. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 85(12), 78-92.Google Scholar
  66. Prahalad, C. K. and S. Hart: 2002, ‘The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid’, Strategy + Business 26:2-14.Google Scholar
  67. Salzmann, O., A. Ionescu-Somers and U. Steger: 2005, ‘The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options’, European Management Journal 23(1), 27-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seeger, M. and R. Ulmer: 2002, ‘A Post-Crisis Discourse of Renewal: The Cases of Malden Mills and Cole Hardwoods’, Journal of Applied Communication Research 30(2), 126-142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seelos, C. and J. Mair: 2005, ‘Social Entrepreneurship: Creating New Business Models to Serve the Poor’, Business Horizons 48(3), 241-246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sen, A (2009). Development as Freedom: Individual Freedom as a Social Commitment, In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, E. von Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 156-175.Google Scholar
  71. Sethi, P. S.: 1979, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns’, Academy of Management Review 4(1), 63-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sison, A. J. G.: 2007, ‘Toward a Common Good Theory of the Firm: The Tasubinsa Case’, Journal of Business Ethics 74(4), 471-480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sison, A. G.: 2008, Corporate governance and ethics: an Aristotelian perspective, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA).Google Scholar
  74. Spitzeck, H.: 2009a, ‘The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility’, Corporate Governance 9(4), 495-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spitzeck, H.: 2009b, ‘Organizational Moral Learning: What, if anything, do corporations learn from NGO critique?’ Journal of Business Ethics 88(1), 157–173.Google Scholar
  76. Spitzeck, H., M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan and E. von Kimakowitz: 2009, Humanism in Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  77. Ulrich, P.: 2008, Integrative Economic Ethics: Foundations of a Civilized Market Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ulrich, P. (2009) ‘Towards a civilized market economy: economic citizenship rights and responsibilities in service of a humane society’, In: H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan, E. von Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 143-155.Google Scholar
  79. UN Global Compact: 2007, ‘The Principles of Responsible Management Education’, New York.Google Scholar
  80. United Nations Department of Public Information: 2006, ‘Criteria. What is an NGO?’ New York).Google Scholar
  81. Useem, M.: 1999, The Leadership Moment (Three Rivers Press, New York).Google Scholar
  82. Vogel, D. J.: 2005, ‘Is There a Market for Virtue? The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review 47(4), 20-45.Google Scholar
  83. von Kimakowitz, E., M. Pirson, H. Spitzeck, C. Dierksmeier and W. Amann: 2010, Humanistic Management in Practice (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  84. Watkins, S.: 2003, ‘Former Enron vice president Sherron Watkins on the Enron collapse’, Academy of Management Executive 17(4), 119-125.Google Scholar
  85. Weick, K. E.: 1979, The social psychology of organizing, (Addison-Wesley, Reading).Google Scholar
  86. Wheeler, D. and M. Sillanpää: 1997, The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value (Pitman, London).Google Scholar
  87. Zadek, S.: 2004, ‘The Path to Corporate Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 82(12), 125–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cranfield School of Management, Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility, Cranfield UniversityBedfordU.K.

Personalised recommendations