Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 93, Supplement 1, pp 53–72 | Cite as

The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance



While there are growing bodies of research examining both the differences between strongly and poorly socially performing firms, and the impact of firm leaders on other strategic outcomes, little has been done in examining the effect of firm leaders on corporate social performance (CSP). This study directly addresses this issue by using upper echelon theory, and the KLD Research Analytics CSP ratings, to show that observable CEO characteristics predict differences in CSP between firms, even when firm and industry characteristics are controlled for. Using a sample of 650 public US firms I find that strong or exemplary CSP, as measured by the strengths categories of KLD’s ratings, is positively related to the CEO having a bachelor’s degree in humanities, having a breadth of career experience and being female. I find that KLD strength ratings are negatively related to the CEO having a bachelor’s degree in economics and to their level of short-term compensation. Preliminary tests of causality support the assertion that these effects reflect CEO discretion rather than being an artifact of reverse causality. Significant relationships between the CEO characteristics and poor social performance as measured by the concerns categories of KLD’s ratings are not found. This suggests that CEOs have more discretion in influencing strong and exemplary social performance than in impacting poor CSP. Implications, particularly for economics education, are discussed. While there are many fruitful directions for future research, the benefits and challenges to conducting similar studies in other countries is focused upon to correspond to the global nature of this special issue.


CEO corporate social performance corporate social responsibility KLD leadership upper echelon theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arce, M. D. G.: 2004, ‘Conspicuous By Its Absence: Ethics and Managerial Economics’, Journal of Business Ethics 54, pp. 261-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bansal, P.: 2005, ‘Evolving Sustainably: A longitudinal study of Corporate Sustainable Development’, Strategic Management Journal 26, pp. 197-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker II, V. L. and Mueller, G. C.: 2002, ‘CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending’, Management Science 48(6), pp. 782-801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berenbeim, R. E.: 2006, ‘Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Vital Speeches of the Day 72 (16/17), pp. 501 – 503.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, S. L. et al.: 1999, ‘Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal 42 (5), pp. 488-506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boone, C. et al.: 1999, ‘The Impact of Personality on Behavior in Five Prisoner’s Dilemma Games’, Journal of Economic Psychology 20, pp. 343-377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bracke, R. et al.: 2007, ‘What Distinguishes EMAS Participants? An Exploration of Company Characteristics’ Working Paper No. 37 Presented at FEEM. Available at SSRN:
  8. Bromley, D.: 1990, ‘The ideology of efficiency; searching for a theory of policy analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economic management 19, pp. 86-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, A. C., P. K. Travedi (1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter, M. A. et al.: 2004, ‘Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition’, Journal of Management 30(6), pp. 749-778.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance’, Academy of Management Review 4, pp. 497-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatterji, A. K. et al. (2009) How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18(1), 125–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cyert, R. M., March, J. G.: (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Datta, D. K. and Guthrie, J. P.: 1994, ‘Executive Succession: Organizational Antecedents of CEO Characteristics’, Strategic Management Journal 15(7) pp. 569-577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, K.: 1973, ‘The Case for and against Business assumption of Social Responsibilities’, Academy of Management Journal 16, pp. 312-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, J. H. et al.: 1997, ‘Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management’, Academy of Management Review 22 (1), pp. 20-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dearborn, D. C. and Simon, H. A.: 1958, ‘Selective Perception: A Note on the Departmental Identification of Executives’, Sociometry 21(2), pp. 140-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Etzion, D.: 2007, ‘Research on Organizations and the Natural Environment, 1992 - Present: A Review’, Journal of Management 33(4), pp. 637-664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, B. and Schultz, G. G.: 2000, ‘Does Economics Make Citizens Corrupt?’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43, pp. 101-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, R. et al.: 1993a, ‘Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(2), pp. 159-171.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, E. R.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective, (Pitman Publishing Inc., Massachusetts and London).Google Scholar
  22. Frey, B. S. et al. (1993) Economics Indoctrination or Selection? Some Empirical Results. Journal of Economics Education 24, 271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman, M.: 1970, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 122–126.Google Scholar
  24. Ghoshal, G., et al. (1999) A New Manifesto for Management. Sloan Management Review 40: 9-20.Google Scholar
  25. Gowdy, J.: 2005, ‘Corporate responsibility and economic theory: an anthropological perspective’, International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(4), pp. 302-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graves, S. B. and Waddock, S. A.: 1994, ‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance,’ Academy of Management Journal 37(4), pp. 1034-1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffin, J. J. and Mahon, J. F.: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research’, Business & Society 36(1), pp. 5-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hambrick, D. C.: 2007, ‘Upper Echelons Theory: An Update’, Academy of Management Review 32(2), pp. 334-343.Google Scholar
  29. Hambrick, D. C. and Finkelstein, S.: 1987, ‘Managerial Discretion: A Bridge Between Polar Views of Organizational Outcomes’, Research in Organizational Behavior 9, pp. 369-406.Google Scholar
  30. Hambrick, D. C. and Fukutomi, G. D. S.: 1991, ‘The seasons of a CEOs’ tenure’, Academy of Management Review 16, pp. 719-942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A.: 1984, ‘Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers’, Academy of Management Review 9, pp. 193-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hemingway, C. A. and Maclagan, P. W.: 2004, ‘Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 50, pp. 33-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review 20(2), pp. 404-437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, T. M. et al.: 1990, Graduate Business Education and the Moral Development of MBA Students: Theory and Preliminary Results, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting to the International Association of Business and Society (San Diego, CA).Google Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D. et al.: 1986, ‘Fairness as a Constraint on profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market’, The American Economic Review 76(4), pp. 728-741.Google Scholar
  36. Kuhn, J. W.: 1998, ‘Emotion As Well As Reason: Getting Students Beyond “Interpersonal Accountability”‘, Journal of Business Ethics 17, pp. 295 – 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langtry, B.: 1994, ‘Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), pp. 431 – 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lieberson, S. and O’Connor, J. F.: 1972, ‘Leadership and Organizational Performance: A Study of Large Corporations’, American Sociological Review 37(2), pp. 117-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahoney, L. S. and Thorne, L.: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Long-Term Compensation: Evidence from Canada’, Journal of Business Ethics 57, pp.241-253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. March, J. G. and Simon, H. A.: 1991, Organizations, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York).Google Scholar
  41. Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P.: 2001, People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey and London).Google Scholar
  42. Marwell, G. and Ames, R.: 1981, ‘Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else?: Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods’, Journal of Public Economics 15(3), pp. 295-310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGuire, J. et al.: 2003, ‘CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 45(4), pp.341-359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McPhail, K.: 2001, ‘The Other Objective of Ethics Education: Re-humanising the Accounting Profession – A Study of Ethics Education in Law, Engineering, Medicine and Accountancy’, Journal of Business Ethics 34(3/4), pp. 279-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D.: 2000, ‘Corporate social responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?’, Strategic Management Journal 21(5), pp. 603-609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D.: 2001, ‘Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’, The Academy of Management Review 26(1), pp. 117-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McWilliams, A. et al.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications’, Journal of Management Studies 43(1), pp. 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, D. et al.: 1982, ‘Top Executive Locus of Control and its Relationship to Strategy Making, Structure and Environment’, Academy of Management Journal 25, pp. 237-253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pfeffer, J.: 2005, ‘Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal’, Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1), pp. 96-100.Google Scholar
  50. Rivera, J. and De Leon, P.: 2005, ‘Chief Executive Officers and Voluntary Environmental Performance: Costa Rica’s Certification for Sustainable Tourism’, Policy Science 38, pp. 107-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Selten, R. and Ockenfels, A.: 1998, ‘An experimental solidarity game’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34, pp. 517-539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sethi, S. P.: 1979, ‘A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns’, Academy of Management Review 4, pp. 63-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharfman, M.: 1996, ‘The Construct Validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini Social Performance Ratings Data’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(3), pp. 287-296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simon, H. A.: 1979, ‘Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations’, The American Economic Review 69(4), pp. 493-513.Google Scholar
  55. Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W.: 2007, Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd ed. (Pearson Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  56. Swanson, D. L.: 2008, ‘Top Managers as Drivers for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. S. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 227–248 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  57. Thomas, A. S., and Simerlym R. L.: 1995, ‘Internal Determinants of Corporate Social Performance: The Role of Top Managers’, Academy of Management Proceedings, pp. 411–415.Google Scholar
  58. Tschopp, D. J.: 2005, `Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparison Between the United States and the European Union', Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12, 55–59Google Scholar
  59. Vogel, D.: 2005, The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, (R. R. Donnelley, Harrisonburg, Virginia).Google Scholar
  60. Waddock, S.: 2003, ‘Myths and Realities of Social Investing’, Organization & Environment 16(3), pp. 369-380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waddock, S. A. and Graves, S. B.: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), pp. 303-319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waldman, D. A. and Siegel, D. S.: 2008, ‘Defining the socially responsible leader’, The Leadership Quarterly 19, pp. 117-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Waldman, D. A. et al.: 2006a, ‘Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Management Studies 43(8), pp. 1703-1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waldman, D. A. et al.: 2006b, ‘Cultural and Leadership predictors of CSR values of Top management. A Global Study of 15 Countries’, Journal of International Business Studies 37, pp. 823-837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walls, J. L.: 2007, ‘The Impact of Corporate Governance on Environmental Strategy’, Doctoral Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar
  66. Walls, J. L., et al.: 2008, Assessment of the Construct Validity of Environmental Strategy Measures, Paper Series 1105 Presented at Ross School of Business, May.Google Scholar
  67. Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), pp. 691-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rensselaer Polytechnic InstitutePoughkeepsieU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations