Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 98, Issue 3, pp 455–466 | Cite as

The Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and Implications

  • Patricia Rinwigati WaagsteinEmail author
Article

Abstract

The adoption of the 2007 Indonesian Law No. 40 has created significant debate over the nature of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), namely, whether it is voluntary or mandatory. On the one hand, the adoption of such a law represents a legal recognition of the existence of CSR, and this clarification on the legal nature of a concept is necessary for understanding the obligation and responsibility. On the other hand, it has created much confusion surrounding its substance and procedures. This article tries to analyze the development and consequences of CSR under 2007 Indonesian Law No. 40, through the discussion of mandatory versus voluntary dichotomy. It is argued in this article that the mandatory nature of CSR is legitimate and therefore encouraged; however, in practice, this is problematic, as it not only requires a precise concept of interpretation of CSR and identification of the duty bearer and beneficiaries, but also an effective implementation mechanism and a means of verifying the impact.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Indonesia mandatory voluntary regulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angus-Leppan, T., Metcalf, L. & Benn, S.: 2010, ‘Leadership Styles and CRC Practice: An Examination of Sensemaking, Institutional Drivers and CSR Leadership,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 189 - 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxi, U.: 2005, ‘Market Fundamentalisms: Business Ethics at the Altar of Human Rights,’ Human Rights Law Review, 5:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broberg, M. P.: 1996, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the European Communities – The Scandinavian Viewpoint,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinkin, C.: 2003, ‘Normative Development in the International Legal System,’ In D. Shelton (Ed.) Commitment and Compliance (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  5. Deva, S.: 2004a, ‘Acting Extraterritorial to Tame Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Violations: Who Should ‘Bell the Cat’?,’ Melbourne Journal of International Law, 5, 52-54.Google Scholar
  6. Deva, S.: 2004b, ‘Relations of “Corporate Observance of Human Rights” to “Competitive Advantage”: An Economic Investigation’, APRU Doctoral Students Conference, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  7. IISD: 2004, The ISO and Corporate Social Responsibility, Issue Briefing Note: Perceptions and Definitions of Social Responsibility (International Institute for Sustainable Development), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  8. Koestoer, Y. T.: 2007, Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Building Internal Corporate Values to Address Challenges in CSR Implementation (Good Corporate and Social Governance in Promoting ASEAN’s Regional Integration, Jakarta), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  9. Lesmana, T.: 2007, ‘CSR untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat’, Media Indonesia.Google Scholar
  10. Maemunah, S.: 2007, ‘Negara Lemah, CSR Menguat’, Jatam.Google Scholar
  11. Matten, D. & Moon, J.: 2005, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR,’ In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner & R. Schidpeter (Eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg).Google Scholar
  12. Matten, D. & J. Moon: 2008, ‘”Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for A Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility,’ Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.Google Scholar
  13. Priyono, H.: 2 July 2007, ‘CSR – Charity or Democratic Accountability?’, The Jakarta Post. Jakarta.Google Scholar
  14. Sedyono, C. H. 2007. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia.’ Jakarta: Indonesia Business Links.Google Scholar
  15. Sethi, S. P.: 2005, Effectiveness of Industry-Based Codes in Serving Public Interest – The Case of International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) (International Center for Corporate Accountability).Google Scholar
  16. Széll, G.: 2004, ‘European Union – Japan: Corporate Social Responsibility & Changing Wage System – the Role of Trade Unions’, in Workshop on EU-Japan: Corporate Social Responsibility & Changing Wage System – The Role of Trade Unions (Sano Shoin Conference Centre, Tokyo).Google Scholar
  17. Uriarte, D. A.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the ASEAN Region’, in The LCF CSR Conference 2008 (Makati City, Philippines), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  18. Vogel, D.: 2005, The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility (Brookings Institution Press,Washington D.C).Google Scholar
  19. Wolff, F. & Barth, R. 2005. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Integrating a Business and Societal Governance Perspective.’ Berlin: RARE.Google Scholar
  20. Wowoho, J.: 2009, Sinkronisasi Kebijakan Corporate Social Responsibility Dengan Hukum Pajak Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan di Indonesia (Universitas Sebelas Maret), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  21. Zerk, J. A.: 2006, Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility (Cambridge University Press,Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations