Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 98, Issue 3, pp 373–390 | Cite as

MNC Strategic Responses to Ethical Pressure: An Institutional Logic Perspective

Article

Abstract

In this study, we aim to investigate how multinational corporations (MNCs) balance ethical pressures from both the home and host countries. Drawing on theories from institutional theory, international business, and business ethics, we build a theoretical framework to explain the ethical behavior of MNCs. We apply the institutional logic concept to examine how MNCs with established logics and principles that have grown in the home country respond to local ethical expectations in the host country. We differentiate the core values from the peripheral components of a MNC’s institutional logic and propose that a MNC will pursue distinctive ethical strategies under different scenarios and choose the “right” configuration of core values and peripheral components that align with institutional environment in host countries.

Key words

multinational corporations (MNCs) business ethics institutional logic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alford, R. R. & Friedland, R. 1985. Powers of theory: capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, D. G. 2003. ‘Exploitation and the sweatshop quandary.’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 13:2, 243-56.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R. M. & Cohen, M. D. 1999. Harnessing complexity: organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aykut, D. & Ratha, D. 2004. ‘South-South FDI flows: how big are they?’ Transnational Corporations, 13:1, 149-76.Google Scholar
  5. Barnet, R. J. & Müller, R. E. 1974. Global reach: the power of the multinational corporations. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H. & Norman, R. Z. 1998. ‘The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders.’ American Sociological Review, 63:3, 379-405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhappu, A. D. 2000. ‘The Japanese family: An institutional logic for Japanese corporate networks and Japanese management.’ Academy of Management Review, 25:2, 409-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boatright, J. R. 2007. Ethics and the conduct of business. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L. & Thâevenot, L. 2006. On justification: economies of worth. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brenkert, G. G. 2009. ‘Google, Human Rights, and Moral Compromise.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 85:4, 453-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B. 1999. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct.’ Business Society, 38:3, 268-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, G. & Hannan, M. T. 2000. The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chandler, A. D. 1970. Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  14. Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A. & Austin, J. R. 2002. ‘Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity.’ Organization Science, 13:5, 475-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czarniawska, B. & Joerges, B. 1996. ‘The travel of ideas.’ In B. Czarniawska-Joerges & G. Sevon (Eds.) Translating Organizational Change: 13-48. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Dann, G. E. & Haddow, N. 2008. ‘Just doing business or doing just business: Google, microsoft, yahoo! and the business of censoring china’s internet.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 79:3, 219-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De George, R. T. 1993. Competing with integrity in international business. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Detomasi, D. A. 2007. ‘The multinational corporation and global governance: Modelling global public policy networks.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 71:3, 321-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dimaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. 1983. ‘The Iron Cage Revisited - Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.’ American Sociological Review, 48:2, 147-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dimaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. 1988. ‘Interest and agency in institutional theory.’ In L. G. Zuker (Ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment: pp. 3-21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  21. Doorewaard, H. & van Bijsterveld, M. 2001. ‘The osmosis of ideas: An analysis of the integrated approach to IT management from a translation theory perspective.’ Organization, 8:1, 55-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Downie, M., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R. & Liodden, T. 2006. ‘On the Risk of Being a Cultural Chameleon: Variations in Collective Self-Esteem Across Social Interactions.’ Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12:3, 527-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunphy, D. 1987. ‘Convergence Divergence - a Temporal Review of the Japanese Enterprise and Its Management.’ Academy of Management Review, 12:3, 445-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Encyclopedia-Britannica: 2008, ‘Lizard’, Encyclopedia Britannica Online, http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-38386. Accessed May 2008.
  25. England, G. W. 1975. The manager and his values: an international perspective from the United States, Japan, Korea, India, and Australia. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  26. England, G. W. & Lee, R. 1974. ‘Relationship between Managerial Values and Managerial Success in United-States, Japan, India, and Australia.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 59:4, 411-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feldman, S. 1988. ‘Structure and Consistency in Public-Opinion - the Role of Core Beliefs and Values.’ American Journal of Political Science, 32:2, 416-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fisher, J. 2004. ‘Social responsibility and ethics: Clarifying the concepts.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 52:4, 391-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fligstein, N. 1987. ‘The Intraorganizational Power Struggle - Rise of Finance Personnel to Top Leadership in Large Corporations, 1919-1979.’ American Sociological Review, 52:1, 44-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford, C. W., Nonis, S. A. & Hudson, G. I. 2005. ‘A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Value Systems and Consumer Ethics.’ Cross-Cultural Management, 12:4, 36-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frenkel, M. 2005. ‘The politics of translation: How state-level political relations affect the cross-national travel of management ideas.’ Organization, 12:2, 275-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Friedland, R. & Alford, R. R. 1991. ‘Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions.’ In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: pp. 232-63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Glynn, M. A. & Abzug, R. 2002. ‘Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names.’ Academy of Management Journal, 45:1, 267-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodwin, J. & Goodwin, D. 1999. ‘Ethical judgments across cultures: A comparison between business students from Malaysia and New Zealand.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 18:3, 267-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. 2008. ‘Introduction.’ In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism: 1-46. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Gugler, P. & Shi, J. Y. J. 2009. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility for Developing Country Multinational Corporations: Lost War in Pertaining Global Competitiveness?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 3-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gutierrez, D. G. 1999. ‘Migration, emergent ethnicity, and the “third space”: The shifting politics of nationalism in greater Mexico.’ Journal of American History, 86:2, 481-517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton, J. B., Knouse, S. B. & Hill, V. 2009. ‘Google in China: A Manager-Friendly Heuristic Model for Resolving Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflicts.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 86:2, 143-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hitlin, S. & Piliavin, J. A. 2004. ‘Values: Reviving a dormant concept.’ Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jackall, R. 1988. Moral mazes: the world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J. & Ridgeway, C. L. 2006. ‘Legitimacy as a social process.’ Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnston, R. D. 2007. ‘Ethnic and Discursive Drag in Woody Allen’s Zelig.’ Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 24:3, 297 - 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Juan, K. and G. Qiang: 2009, ‘Google China Vows to Address Porn “Problem”’. People’s Daily, http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90782/6683011.html. Accessed 22 June 2009.
  45. Kluckhohn, C. 1951. ‘Values and value-orientations in the theory of action.’ In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.) Towards a General Theory of Action: 388-433. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  46. Kwok, C. C. Y. & Tadesse, S. 2006. ‘The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption.’ Journal of International Business Studies, 37:6, 767-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Latour, B. 1986. ‘The powers of association.’ In J. Law (Ed.) Power, Action and Belief: 264-80. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  48. Lenovo: 2009. ‘Lenovo’s Commitment to Social Respon- sibility’. Lenovo (US) official website.Google Scholar
  49. Lounsbury, M. 2007. ‘A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds.’ Academy of Management Journal, 50:2, 289-307.Google Scholar
  50. Maguire, S., Hardy, C. & Lawrence, T. B. 2004. ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDA treatment advocacy in Canada.’ Academy of Management Journal, 47:5, 657-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marini, M. 2000. ‘Social values and norms.’ In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.) Encyclopedia of sociology: 2828-40. Detroit: Macmillan Reference, USA.Google Scholar
  52. Marquis, C. 2003. ‘The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 48:4, 655-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A. & Davis, G. F. 2007. ‘Community isomorphism and corporate social action.’ Academy of Management Review, 32:3, 925-45.Google Scholar
  54. Marquis, C. & Lounsbury, M. 2007. ‘Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking.’ Academy of Management Journal, 50:4, 799-820.Google Scholar
  55. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M. & Ramirez, F. O. 1997. ‘World society and the nation-state.’ American Journal of Sociology, 103:1, 144-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meyer, R. E. & Hammerschmid, G. 2006. ‘Changing institutional logics and executive identities - A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria.’ American Behavioral Scientist, 49:7, 1000-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. 1977. ‘Institutionalized Organizations - Formal-Structure as Myth and Ceremony.’ American Journal of Sociology, 83:2, 340-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Michener, H. A., DeLamater, J. & Myers, D. 2004. Social psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  59. Oliver, C. 1991. ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.’ Academy of Management Review, 16:1, 145-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Perry, N. 1995. ‘Traveling Theory Nomadic Theorizing.’ Organization, 2:1, 35-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. 1991. The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Cheung, F. M. & Terpstra, R. H. 1993. ‘Differences in Managerial Values - a Study of United-States, Hong-Kong and Prc Managers.’ Journal of International Business Studies, 24:2, 249-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ralston, D. A., Holt, D. H., Terpstra, R. H. & KaiCheng, Y. 1997. ‘The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: A study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China.’ Journal of International Business Studies, 28:1, 177-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rao, H., Monin, P. & Durand, R. 2005. ‘Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy.’ American Sociological Review, 70:6, 968-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rashid, Z. & Ibrahim, S. 2008. ‘The Effect of Culture and Religiosity on Business Ethics: A Cross-cultural Comparison.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 82:4, 907-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ritzer, G. 2008. The McDonaldization of society 5. Los Angles, Calif.: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  67. Robertson, R. 1995. ‘Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity.’ In M. Featherstone, S. Lash & R. Robertson (Eds.) Global modernities: 25-44. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  68. Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  69. Sahlin-Andersson, K. 1996. ‘Imitating by editing success: The construction of organization fields.’ In B. Czarniawska-Joerges & G. Sevon (Eds.) Translating Organizational Change: 69–92. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  70. Sarwono, S. S. & Armstrong, R. W. 2001. ‘Microcultural differences and perceived ethical problems: An international business perspective.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 30:1, 41-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Schneiberg, M. 2007. ‘What’s on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900-1950.’ Socio-Economic Review, 5, 47-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schneiberg, M. & Soule, S. A. 2005. ‘Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process: The case of rate regulation in American fire insurance.’ In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott & M. N. Zald (Eds.) Social Movements and Organization Theory: 122–60. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Schwartz, S. 1992. ‘Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.’ In M. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: 1-65. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  75. Schwartz, S. H. 1994. ‘Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human-Values.’ Journal of Social Issues, 50:4, 19-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schwartz, S. H. & Bilsky, W. 1987. ‘Toward a Universal Psychological Structure of Human-Values.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53:3, 550-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schwartz, S. H. & Bilsky, W. 1990. ‘Toward a Theory of the Universal Content and Structure of Values - Extensions and Cross-Cultural Replications.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58:5, 878-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M. & Owens, V. 2001. ‘Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement.’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32:5, 519-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwartz, S. H. & Sagie, G. 2000. ‘Value consensus and importance - A cross-national study.’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31:4, 465-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scott, W. R. 2000. Institutional change and healthcare organizations: from professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  81. Simpson, J. R. 1982. ‘Ethics and Multinational-Corporations Vis-a-Vis Developing-Nations.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 1:3, 227-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith, P. B. & Schwartz, S. H. 1997. ‘Values.’ In J. W. Berry, C. Kagitcibasi & M. H. Segall (Eds.) Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology: 77-119. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  83. Sorenson, O. & Baum, J. A. C. 2003. ‘Geography and Strategy: The Strategic Management of Space and Place.’ In J. A. C. Baum & O. Sorenson (Eds.) Geography and Strategy, Advances in strategic management. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  84. Stovel, K. & Savage, M. 2006. ‘Mergers and mobility: Organizational growth and the origins of career migration at Lloyds Bank.’ American Journal of Sociology, 111:4, 1080-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Strang, D. & Soule, S. A. 1998. ‘Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills.’ In J. Hagan & K. S. Cook (Eds.) Annual Review of Sociology: 265-90. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  86. Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R. 2005. ‘Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy.’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 50:1, 35-67.Google Scholar
  87. Swidler, A. 1986. ‘Culture in Action - Symbols and Strategies.’ American Sociological Review, 51:2, 273-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tan, J. 2009a. ‘Institutional Structure and Firm Social Performance in Transitional Economies: Evidence of Multinational Corporations in China.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tan, J. 2009b. ‘Multinational Corporations and Social Responsibility in Emerging Markets: Opportunities and Challenges for Research and Practice.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tan, J. & Tan, D. 2005. ‘Environment-strategy co-evolution and co-alignment: A staged model of Chinese SOEs under transition.’ Strategic Management Journal, 26:2, 141-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. The Economist: 2008, ‘The Siemens Scandal: Siemens Pays More Than $1 Billion to Settle Charges of Bribery and Corruption in Germany and America.’ The Economist.Google Scholar
  92. Thornton, P. H. 2004. Markets from culture: institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  93. Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. 1999. ‘Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990.’ American Journal of Sociology, 105:3, 801-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. 2008. ‘Institutional logics.’ In K. Sahlin-Andersson, R. Greenwood, C. Oliver & R. Suddaby (Eds.) The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism: pp. 99-129. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  95. Tung, R. L. & Liu, C. Z. 2007. ‘Lenovo: an example of globalization of Chinese enterprises - Chuan Zhi Liu.’ Journal of International Business Studies, 38:4, 573-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. UNCTAD: 2006, FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development, World Investment Report 2006. United Nations Publication, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  97. Varley, P., Mathiasen, C. & Voorhes, M. 1998. The sweatshop quandary: corporate responsibility on the global frontier. Washington, D.C.: Investor Responsibility Research Center.Google Scholar
  98. Walker, G. 2003. ‘The roots of Alexander Korda: myths of identity and the international film.’ Patterns of Prejudice, 37:1, 3-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Westney, D. E. 1993. ‘Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation.’ In S. Ghoshal & D. E. Westney (Eds.) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation: 53-75. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  100. White, L. P. & Rhodeback, M. J. 1992. ‘Ethical Dilemmas in Organization-Development - a Cross-Cultural-Analysis.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 11:9, 663-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Williams, R. J. 1968. ‘The concept of values.’ In D. L. Sills (Ed.) International encyclopedia of the social sciences: 283-87. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  102. Zilber, T. B. 2006. ‘The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli High Tech.’ Academy of Management Journal, 49:2, 281-303.Google Scholar
  103. Zucker, L. G. 1977. ‘The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.’ American Sociological Review, 42:5, 726-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations