Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 121–136 | Cite as

The Stakeholder Approach: A Sustainability Perspective

  • Don CliftonEmail author
  • Azlan Amran
Article

Abstract

This article considers the stakeholder approach (SHA) to organisational management through the lens of what it means for humans to live sustainably on the Earth (that is, for there to be a sustainable world). In particular, the article considers if the SHA, as it is presented in mainstream academic and management literature, is supportive of corporate practices that advance the achievement of a sustainable world. The analysis shows the SHA to have significant failings in this regard when viewed against key sustainable world criteria, with issues of concern evident from the normative core of the SHA through to is practical application in the management setting.

Keywords

stakeholders stakeholder approach sustainability sustainable world sustaining corporation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 12M: 2009, Stakeholder Analysis (12 Manage; Bilthoven, The Netherlands), http://www.12manage.com/. Accessed 1 Nov 2009.
  2. Agle, BR, Mitchell, RK & Sonnenfeld, DA 1999, ‘Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 507-525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APCEA: 2010, Asia Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability (Asia Pacific Centre for Environmental Accountability (APCEA)), http://www.unisa.edu.au/cags/APCEA/asia_pacific_centre_for_environmental_accounting.asp.
  4. Asafu-Adjaye, J 2005, Environmental Economics for Non-Economists, 2nd edn, World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore.Google Scholar
  5. Attfield, R 1998, Environmental Ethics and Intergenerational Equity. Inquiry 41(2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee, SB 2000, ‘Whose Land is it Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses’, Organization & Environment, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee, SB 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’, Critical Sociology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 51-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barry, B 2003, ‘Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice (reproduced from “Theoria” 1997)’, in A Light & H Rolston, eds. Environmental Ethics. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK., pp. 487-499.Google Scholar
  9. Bell, MM 2009, An Invitation to Environmental Sociology. Pine Forage Press, California USA.Google Scholar
  10. Blewitt, J 2008, Understanding Sustainable Development. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  11. Boyden, S.: 2001, Nature, Society, History and Social Change. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2):103-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brughal, R & Sa Varvasovszky, S 2000, ‘Stakeholder Analysis: a Review’, Health Policy and Planning, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 239-246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruno, K & Karliner, J 2002 Earthsummit.biz: The Corporate Takeover of Sustainable Development. Food First Books, Oakland California.Google Scholar
  14. Buchholz, R. A. and S. B. Rosenthal: 2004, ‘Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 143-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organisational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons July/August, 39–48.Google Scholar
  16. Cato MS 2009, Green Economics. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  17. Ceres: 2010, Ceres, http://www.ceres.org/.
  18. Clarkson, M 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyising and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 92-117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clifton, D 2009, ‘Security and a Sustainable World’, Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 2, no. 3, November 2009, pp. 3-17.Google Scholar
  20. Clifton, D.: 2010, ‘Representing a Sustainable World – A Typology Approach’, Journal of Sustainable Development 3(2), June 2010 (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Common, M & Stagl, S 2005, Ecological Economics, University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Daly, H & Farley, J 2004, Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Island Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  23. Dunphy, D, Griffiths, A & Benn, S 2003, Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  24. Ehrlich, PR 1985, ‘Extinctions and Ecosystem Functions: Implications for Humankind’, in Animal Extinctions: What Everyone Should Know, ed. RJ Hoage, Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC, pp. 59-73.Google Scholar
  25. Estes, RJ 1993, ‘Towards Sustainable Development: From Theory to Praxis’, Social Development Issues, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1-29.Google Scholar
  26. Esty, DC & Winston, AS 2009, Green to Gold. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken New Jersey.Google Scholar
  27. Field, BC & Field, MK 2006, Environmental Economics. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Footprint Network: 2010, Ecological Footprint, http://www.footprintnetwork.org/.
  29. Frankental, P 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility – a PR Invention?’ Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freeman, R. E. and J. McVea: 2001, ‘A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management’, Darden Business School Working Paper, Vol 01-02.Google Scholar
  31. Friedman, A. L. and S. Miles: 2002, ‘Developing Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Management Studies, 39(1):1-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gladwin, TN, Kennelly, JJ & Krause, T-S 1995, ‘Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research.’ Academy of Management Review, 20(4):874-907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gould, KA & Lewis, TL 2009, ‘The Paradoxes of Sustainable Development’, in Twenty Lessons in Environmental Sociology, eds. KA Gould & TL Lewis, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 269-289.Google Scholar
  34. Hart, SL 2007, Capitalism at the Crossroads, 2nd edn, Pearson Education, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  35. Hart, S & Milstein, MB 2003, ‘Creating Sustainable Value’, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 56-69.Google Scholar
  36. Holbrook, D.: 2009, ‘The Consequentialist Side of Environmental Ethics (Reprint of Daniel Holbrook, ‘Consequentialist Side of Environmental Ethics’, in Environmental Values, 6, 1997, pp. 87–96)’, in M. Reynolds, C. Blackmore and M. J. Smith (eds.), The Environmental Responsibility Reader (Zed Books, London).Google Scholar
  37. Hughes, JD 2001, An Environmental History of the World, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  38. IISD: 2010, International Institute for Sustainable Development, www.iisd.org.
  39. Ikeme, J.: 2003, ‘Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: incomplete approaches in climate change politics’, Global Environmental Change, 13(3), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iyer, GR 1999, ‘Business, Consumers and Sustainable Living in an Interconnected World: A Multilateral Approach’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 20, pp. 273-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson, G, Scholes, K & Whittington, R 2005, Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education Limited, Essex England.Google Scholar
  42. Kaler, J.: 2004, ‘Arriving at an acceptable formulation of stakeholder theory’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(1):73-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kates, RW 2003, ‘The Nexus and the Neem Tree: Globalization and a Transition Toward Sustainability’, in Worlds Apart - Globalization and the Environment, ed. JG Speth, Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 85-107.Google Scholar
  44. Lantos, GP 2002, ‘The Ethicality of Altruistic Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 19, no. 3, 3 November 2002, pp. 205-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Light, A & Rolston, H 2003a, Environmental Ethics. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford UK.Google Scholar
  46. Light, A. and H. Rolston: 2003b, ‘Introduction: Ethics and Environmental Ethics’, in Environmental Ethics (Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  47. LMC: 2009, Stakeholder Mapping (London Management Center, London, UK), http://www.lmcuk.com/home. Accessed 1 Nov 2009.
  48. Manderson, AK 2006, ‘A Systems Based Framework to Examine The Multi-Contextual Application of the Sustainability Concept’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 8, pp. 85-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McDonough, W & Braungart, M 2002, Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way we Make Things. North Point Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Mebratu, D.: 1998, ‘Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Historical and Conceptual Review’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(6):493-520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell, RK, Agle, BR & Wood, DJ 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 853-886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Naess, A 1988, ‘Sustainable Development and the Deep Long-Range Ecology Movement’, The Trumpeter, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 138-142.Google Scholar
  53. nrg4SD: 2002, nrg4SD: Information Package for the Network (Network of Regional Governments for Sustainable Development).Google Scholar
  54. O’Neill, J 2003, ‘The Varieties of Intrinsic Value (reproduced from “The Monist 75”, 1992)’, in Environmental Ethics, eds. A Light & H Rolston, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK., pp. 131-142.Google Scholar
  55. O’Neill, J, Holland, A & Light, A 2008, Environmental Values. Routledge. Abingdon UK.Google Scholar
  56. Orts, E. W. and A. Strudler: 2002, ‘The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2):215-233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Osorio, LA, Lobato, MO & Castillo, X 2005, ‘Debates on Sustainable Development: Towards a Holistic View of Reality’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 7, pp. 501-518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parent, MM & Deephouse, DL 2007, ‘A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 75, pp. 1-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peloza, J & Papania, L 2008, ‘The Missing Link between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Stakeholder Salience and Identification’, Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 169-181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pezzoli, K 1997, ‘Sustainable Development: A Transdisciplinary Overview of the Literature’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 549-574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Phillips, R., R. E. Freeman and A. C. Wicks: 2003, ‘What Stakeholder Theory is Not.’ Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 13(4):479-502.Google Scholar
  62. Podnar, K & Jancic, Z 2006, ‘Towards a Categorization of Stakeholder Groups: An Empirical Verification of a Three-Level Model’, Journal of Marketing Communications, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 297-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schaltegger, S, Bennett, M & Burritt, R 2006, Sustainability Accounting and Reporting (Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  64. Schlange, LE 2009, ‘Stakeholder Identification in Sustainability Entrepreneurship; The Role of Managerial and Organisational Cognition’, Greener Management International, vol. 55, pp. 13-55.Google Scholar
  65. Schlosberg, D 2007, Defining Environmental Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Speth, JG & Haas, PM 2006, Global Environmental Governance, Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  67. Starik, M 1994, ‘The Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory’, Business & Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 89-95.Google Scholar
  68. Sternberg, E 1997, ‘The Defects of Stakeholder Theory’, Scholarly Research and Theory Papers, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3-10.Google Scholar
  69. Steurer, R, Langer, ME, Konrad, A & Martinuzzi, A 2005, ‘Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business-Society Relations’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 61, pp. 263-281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stieb, JA 2009, ‘Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 87, pp. 401-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taylor, P 1989, Respect for Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  72. UHK: 2010, Critical Thinking Wed (The Philosophy Department, The University of Hong Kong), http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/.
  73. UN: 1992, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’, 3–14 June 2004.Google Scholar
  74. UN: 2008, Corporate Citizenship in the World Economy (United Nations Global Compact, New York), http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/GC_brochure_FINAL.pdf.
  75. Van De Ven, B & Jeurissen, R 2005, ‘Competing Responsibly’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 2, April 2005, pp. 299-317.Google Scholar
  76. van Marrewijk, M 2003, ‘Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 44, no. 2/3, pp. 95-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Walsh, JP 2005, ‘Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management.’ Academy of Management Review, 30(2):426-438.Google Scholar
  78. Wartick, S 1994, ‘The Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory’, Business & Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 110-117.Google Scholar
  79. WBCSD: 2008, The World Business Council for Sustain- able Developmentweb site, http://www.wbcsd.ch/templates/TemplateWBCSD5/layout.asp?type=p&MenuId=Njk&doOpen=1&ClickMenu=LeftMenu. Accessed 16 Jun 2008.
  80. WBCSD: 2010, The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (The World Business Council for Sustainable Development), www.wbcsd.org.
  81. WCED 1987, Our Common Future: World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  82. Welford, R (ed.) 1997, Hijacking Environmentalism, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  83. Williams, C. C. and A. C. Millington, 2004, ‘The Diverse and Contested Meanings of Sustainable Development’, Geographical Journal, 170(2):99-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wissenburg, M 2001, Dehierarachization and Sustainable Development in Liberal and Non-Liberal Societies. Global Environmental Politics, 1(2), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wood, DJ 1994, ‘The Toronto Conference: Reflections on Stakeholder Theory’, Business & Society, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 101-105.Google Scholar
  86. WWI: 2010, World Watch Institute, www.worldwatch.org.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations