Detecting Supply Chain Innovation Potential for Sustainable Development
- 1.2k Downloads
In a world of limited resources, it could be argued that companies that aspire to be good corporate citizens need to focus on making best use of resources. User value and environmental harm are created in supply chains and it could therefore be argued that company business ethics should be extended from the company to the entire value chain from the first supplier to the last customer. Starting with a delineation of the linkages between business ethics, corporate sustainability, and the stakeholder concept, this article argues that supply chains generally have a great innovation potential for sustainable development. This potential could be highlighted with system thinking and the use of change management knowledge, promoting not only innovations within technology but also within organizational improvement. We propose process models and performance indicators as means of highlighting improvement potential and thus breaking down normative business ethics’ requirements to an opertionalizable corporate level: Good business ethics should focus on maximizing stakeholder value in relation to harm done. Our results indicate that focusing on supply chains reveals previously unknown innovation potential that seems to be related to limited system understanding. The assumption is that increased visibility of opportunities will act as a driver for change. Results also highlight the importance of focusing on sustainability effects of the core business and clearly relating value created to harm done.
Keywordsmeasurement system supply chain sustainability indicators
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beer, S. (1985): Diagnosing the system for organizations. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Beer, S. (1995): Brain of the firm. 2nd Ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Böhnisch, W. (1975). “Personale Innovationswiderstände”. In: Gaugler, E. (Ed.): Handwörterbuch des Personalwesens: 1046–1061. Stuttgart: Poeschel.Google Scholar
- DanWatch: 2008, ‘Bad Connections – How Your Mobile Phone is Linked to Abuse, Fraud and Unfair Mining Practices in DR Congo’, http://www.consumersinternational.org/shared_asp_files/GFSR.asp?NodeID=97663&bcsi_scan_3EAB0ABF9D901350=0&bcsi_scan_filename=GFSR.asp.
- Ericsson: 2007, ‘Sustainable Energy Use in Mobile Communications’. EAB-07:021801 Uen Rev C. http://www.ericsson.com/technology/whitepapers/telecom_expansion/sustainable_energy_use.shtml.
- Foley, K.J. (2005). Meta-management: a stakeholder/quality management approach to whole-of-enterprise management. SAI Global, Sydney.Google Scholar
- Garvare, R. and P. Johansson: 2009, ‘Management for Sustainability – A Stakeholder Theory’, TQM & Business Excellence Journal (accepted).Google Scholar
- Greenpeace: 2008, ‘How the Companies Line Up’, http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up-9. 05-03-2009.
- Hall, G., B. Rosenthal and J. Wade: 1993, ‘How to Make Reengineering Really Work’, Harvard Business Review, Nov–Dec, 119–131.Google Scholar
- Isaksson, R. and N. Taylor: 2006, The Process Improve- ment Program. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Quality Management and Organizational Development, 9th–11th August 2006, Liverpool.Google Scholar
- Isaksson, R.: 2007, Product Quality and Sustainability in the Cement Industry. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cement Chemistry, Montreal, Canada, 8–13 July.Google Scholar
- Isaksson, R., J. Hallencreutz and R. Garvare: 2008, ‘Process Management and System-Thinking for Sustainable Development’, in K. J. Foley et al. (eds.), The Theories and Practises of Organization Excellence: New Perspectives, Chap. 8 (Consensus Books, Sydney), pp. 205–232.Google Scholar
- Isaksson, R. and N. Taylor: 2009, Drivers for Sustainability – Making Better Use of Cement in Dar es Salaam. Proceedings of the 12th QMOD Conference, Verona, Italy.Google Scholar
- Isaksson, R. & Hallencreutz, J. (2008). The Measurement System Resource as Support for Sustainable Change. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture & Change Management, 8 (1), 265-274.Google Scholar
- Malik, F. (2008). Strategie des Managements komplexer Systeme: ein Beitrag zur Management-Kybernetik evolutionärer Systeme. 10th Ed. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.Google Scholar
- Nokia: 2008, ‘Nokia CR Report 2007’, http://www.nokia.com/environment/our-responsibility/environmental-report-2008/previous-reports, 04-03-2009.
- Prahalad, C. K.(2006). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid – Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
- Probst, G. J. B. (1981). Kybernetische Gesetzeshypothesen als Basis für Gestaltungs- und Lenkungsregeln im Management. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.Google Scholar
- Rentzhog, O. (1996). Core Process Management. Linköping University, Division of Quality Technology, Linköping.Google Scholar
- Skjott-Larsen. T. & Schary, P.B. & Mikkola, J.H. & Kotzab, H. (2007). Managing the Global Supply Chain 3rd Ed. Liber, Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
- SOMO: 2006, The High Cost of Calling – Critical Issues in the Mobile Phone Industry (SOMO, Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
- SOMO and Swedewatch: 2008, ‘Silenced to Deliver – Mobile Phone Manufacturing in China and the Philippines’.Google Scholar
- Suchanek, A.: 2008, Business Ethics and the Golden Rule. Discussion Paper of the Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics (2008-3).Google Scholar
- WBCSD: 2000, ‘Eco-Efficiency, Creating more Value with Less Impact’, www.wbcsd.org.
- WBCSD: 2004. www.wbcsd.org.
- WBCSD: 2008, ‘Energy Efficiency in Buildings’, www.wbcsd.org.
- WCED (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilms, F. E. P. (2003). Systemorientiertes Management. Vahlen: München.Google Scholar