Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 311–324 | Cite as

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh

Article

Abstract

Recent calls in the corporate social reporting (CSRep) literature have emphasized the importance of giving voice to non-managerial stakeholder groups in the social reporting process. The research, presented in this paper, employs recent work in stakeholder theory and CSRep to examine the perceptions of a diverse set of non-managerial stakeholders in the context of a developing country, Bangladesh. A series of semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who identify with various non-managerial stakeholder groups. Interviewees generally believed that the motivation and practice of CSRep in Bangladesh is developing in response to pressures from international markets and is producing largely cosmetic responses. Also, they expressed concerns that, given the economic, political, and social conditions in Bangladesh, premature adoption of strict CSRep standards may lead to increased corruption and other unintended consequences. Whilst some of the interviewees sharply criticized the current process of imposing social accounting codes/standards on developing countries which fail to consider the important local socio-economic context, the findings suggest that there is overwhelming support for mandatory externally verified CSRep based on the principles of peoples’ right to know, full disclosure/completeness, and relevance, which are anchored in the broader principles of transparency and stakeholder accountability.

Key words

corporate social reporting (CSRep) stakeholders stakeholders’ perceptions accountability Bangladesh 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by Sheffield University Management School, UK. Previous versions were presented at the International Congress of Social and Environmental Accounting Research 2003, Dundee; ‘CSR in Asia’ Conference 2006, Kuala Lumpur and Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Accounting Conference 2006, Cardiff. The first author is grateful for comments on earlier drafts of this article by the participants of the above conferences, Stewart Clegg, David Collison, David Owen, John Sillince and Jeffrey Unerman.

References

  1. Adams, C.: 2002, ‘Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(2), 223-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afrin, S. N.: 2002, ‘Garment Girls Still Left Neglected’, The Bangladesh Observer 1st February, 31.Google Scholar
  3. Al-khater, K., & Naser, K.: 2003, ‘Users’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility and accountability: evidence from an emerging economy’, Managerial Auditing Journal 18(6/7), 538-548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bebbington, J., R. Gray, I. Thomson, and D. Walters: 1994, ‘Accountants’ Attitudes and Environmentally-sensitive Accounting’, Accounting and Business Research 24(Spring), 109–120.Google Scholar
  5. Bebbington, J., Gray, R., & Owen, D.: 1999, ‘Seeing the wood for the trees: taking the pulse of social and environmental accounting’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 12(1), 47-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belal, A.: 2000, ‘Environmental Reporting in Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh’, Eco-Management and Auditing 7(3), 114-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belal, A.: 2001, ‘A Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in Bangladesh’, Managerial Auditing Journal 16(5), 274-289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belal, A. R.: 2002, ‘Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms’ social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR)’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9(1), 8-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belal, A. R.: 2008, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Developing Countries: The Case of Bangladesh, (Ashgate, Aldershot).Google Scholar
  10. Belal, A. R., Khan, N. A., & Alam, S. A.: 1998, ‘Industrial Pollution and the Environment in Bangladesh: An Overview’, Asian Journal of Environmental Management 6(2), 115-124.Google Scholar
  11. Belal, A. R., & Owen, D.: 2007, ‘The Views of Corporate Managers on the Current State of, and Future Prospects for, Social Reporting in Bangladesh: An Engagement Based Study’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20(3), 472-494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bird, F., & Smucker, J.: 2007, ‘The Social Responsibilities of International Business Firms in Developing Areas’, Journal of Business Ethics 73(1), 1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, N., & Deegan, C.: 1999, ‘The public disclosure of environmental performance information - a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory’, Accounting and Business Research 29(1), 21-41.Google Scholar
  14. Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B.: 2005, ‘Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 58(1), 137-148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J., & Nahapiet, J.: 1980, ‘The roles of accounting in organizations and society’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 5(1), 5-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byron, R. K.: 2005, ‘Corporate Sector to be Accountable to JS’, The Daily Star 9 March.Google Scholar
  17. Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C.: 2006, ‘Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 31(4-5), 343-372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deegan, C., Geddes, S., & Staunton, J.: 1995, ‘A Survey of Australian Accountants’ Attitudes on Environmental Reporting’, Accounting Forum 19(2/3), 143-163.Google Scholar
  19. Deegan, C., & Unerman, J.: 2006, Financial Accounting Theory, (McGraw Hill, Maidenhead, UK).Google Scholar
  20. EC: 2001, Green Paper: Promoting European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (European Commission (EC), Brussels).Google Scholar
  21. EC. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development. Brussels: European Commission (EC).Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S.: 2001, ‘Socially Responsible Investment and Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting in the UK: An Exploratory Study’, The British Accounting Review 33(4), 523-548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W.: 2007, ‘Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century’, Journal of Business Ethics 70(1), 87-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R., & Zadek, S.: 1997, ‘Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10(3), 325-364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. GRI: 2000, ‘Sustainability Reporting Guidelines’, http://www.globalreporting.org. Retrieved 13 Aug 2001.
  26. Hasan, R.: 2002, ‘Tax Evasion Charges Against Cement Company’, The Daily Star 14 March.Google Scholar
  27. Holder-Webb L., Cohen J., Nath L.,Wood, D (2009) The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among US firms. Journal of Business Ethics 84:497-527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Imam, S.: 1999, ‘Environmental Reporting in Bangladesh’, Social and Environmental Accounting 19(2), 12-14.Google Scholar
  29. Imam, S.: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Performance Reporting in Bangladesh’, Managerial Auditing Journal 15(3), 133-141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ISEA: 1999, Accountability 1000(AA1000) Framework (ISEA, London).Google Scholar
  31. Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C.: 2008, ‘Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21(6), 850 - 874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R.: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSREP): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context’, Journal of Business Ethics 72(3), 243-262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaler, J.: 2006, ‘Evaluating Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 69(3), 249-268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khaleque, A.: 2005, ‘Transparency, Corporate Corruption and Anti-Corruption Commission’, The Daily Star 18th July.Google Scholar
  35. Khundhker, N.: 2002, ‘Globalisation, Competitiveness and Job Quality in the Garment Industry in Bangladesh’, in M. Muqtada, A. Singh, and M. Rashid (eds.), Bangladesh: Economic and Social Challenges of Globalisation (University Press Ltd., Dhaka).Google Scholar
  36. Kuasirikun, N.: 2005, ‘Attitudes to the development and implementation of social and environmental accounting in Thailand’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16(8), 1035-1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larrinaga, C., Llena, F., Moneva, J. M., Carrasco, F., & Correa, C.: 2002, ‘Accountability and accounting regulation: The case of the Spanish environmental disclosure standard’, European Accounting Review 11(4), 723-740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lodhia, S. K.: 2003, ‘Accountants’ response to the environmental agenda in a developing nation: an initial and exploratory study on Fiji’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14(7), 715-737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahmud, W.: 2004, ‘Bangladesh: Structural Adjustment and Beyond’, in W. Mahmud (ed.), Adjustment and Beyond: the Reform Experience in South Asia (Palgrave, Basingstoke).Google Scholar
  40. Medawar, C.: 1976, ‘The Social Audit: A Political View’, Accounting, Organisations and Society 1(4), 389-394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milne, S.: 2001, ‘Textile Workers Build Solidarity in Bangladesh’, The Guardian (Online).Google Scholar
  42. Naser, K., & Baker, N.: 1999, ‘Empirical Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Accountability in Developing Countries: The Case of Jordan’, Advances in International Accounting 12, 193-226.Google Scholar
  43. Newson, M., & Deegan, C.: 2002, ‘Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea’, The International Journal of Accounting 37(2), 183-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nurunnabi, A.: 2002, ‘Pollution of River Water’, The Daily Star 29 June.Google Scholar
  45. O’Dwyer, B.: 2002, ‘Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3), 406-436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Bradley, J.: 2005a, ‘Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: Engaging the voices of non-governmental organisations’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18(1), 14-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Hession, E.: 2005b, ‘User needs in sustainability reporting: perspective of stakeholders in Ireland’, European Accounting Review 14(4), 759-787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Owen D., Gray R., Bebbington J (1997) ‘Green Accounting: Cosmetic Irrelevance or Radical Agenda for Change?’. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting 4(2):175-198.Google Scholar
  49. Owen D. L., Swift T. A., Humphrey C., Bowerman M (2000) ‘The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions?’. European Accounting Review 9(1):81-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Owen, D. L., Swift, T., & Hunt, K.: 2001, ‘Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting’, Accounting Forum 25(3), 264-282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parkinson, J.: 2003, ‘Disclosure and corporate social and environmental performance: competitiveness and enterprise in a broader social frame’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 3(1), 3-39.Google Scholar
  52. Pater, A., & Lierop, K. v.: 2006, ‘Sense and sensitivity: the roles of organisation and stakeholders in managing corporate social responsibility’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4), 339-351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perry, M., & Singh, S. (2001). Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Singapore and Malaysia: The Potential and Limits of Voluntary Initiatives (No. PP TBS 3). Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  54. Priyangika, N.: 1999, ‘Child Labour on the Increase in Bangladesh’, http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/nov1999/bang-n03.shtml. Retrieved 27 July 2001.
  55. Quaak, L., Aalbers, T., & Goedee, J.: 2007, ‘Transparency of Corporate Social Responsibility in Dutch Breweries’, Journal of Business Ethics 76(3), 293-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rahman, M. S.: 2003, ‘Auditors’ Compromise Blocks Good Corporate Governance’, The Daily Star 5th July.Google Scholar
  57. Reed, D.: 2002, ‘Employing Normative Stakeholder Theory in Developing Countries: A Critical Theory Perspective’, Business & Society 41(2), 166-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K.: 2008, ‘Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(1), 47-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. 2003. Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45: 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. 2003. Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sobhani, F. A., Amran, A., & Zainuddin, Y.: 2009, ‘Revisiting the practices of corporate social and environmental disclosure in Bangladesh’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16(3), 167-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. TheDailyStar: 2004, ‘Unicef, ILO Call for Ending Worst Forms of Child Labour’, The Daily Star 16th September.Google Scholar
  63. Tilt, C. A.: 1994, ‘The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate Social Disclosure: Some Empirical Evidence’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7(4), 47-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tsoi, J.: 2010, ‘Stakeholders’ Perceptions and Future Scenarios to Improve Corporate Social Responsibility in Hong Kong and Mainland China ‘, Journal of Business Ethics 91(3), 391 - 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Unerman, J., & Bennett, M.: 2004, ‘Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?’ Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(7), 685-707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vogel, D.: 2010, ‘The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct: Achievements and Limitations’, Business and Society 49(1), 68–87.Google Scholar
  67. WorldBank: 2006, ‘World Development Indicators Database’, http://www.worldbank.org/data/dataquery.html. Retrieved 5 June 2009.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finance, Accounting & Law Group, Aston Business SchoolAston UniversityBirmingham U.K.
  2. 2.Kenneth G. Dixon School of Accounting, College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations