Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 96, Issue 4, pp 657–668 | Cite as

The Meaning(s) of Trust. A Content Analysis on the Diverse Conceptualizations of Trust in Scholarly Research on Business Relationships

  • Sandro Castaldo
  • Katia PremazziEmail author
  • Fabrizio Zerbini
Article

Abstract

Scholarly research largely converges on the argument that trust is of paramount importance to drive economic agents toward mutually satisfactory, fair, and ethically compliant behaviors. There is, however, little agreement on the meaning of trust, whose conceptualizations differ with respect to actors, relationships, behaviors, and contexts. At present, we know much better what trust does than what trust is. In this article, we present an extensive review and analysis of the most prominent articles on trust in market relationships. Using computer-aided content analysis and network analysis methods, we identify key, recurring dimensions that guided the conceptualization of trust in past research, and show how trust can be developed as a multifaceted and layered construct. Our results are an important contribution to a convergence of research toward a shared and common view of the meaning of trust. This process is important to ensure the body of trust research’s internal theoretical consistency, and to provide reliable and common principles for the management of business relationships – a context in which opportunism and imperfect information may induce economic actors to cheat and stray from fair and ethically compliant behaviors.

Keywords

trust trust conceptualization business relationships content analysis network analysis review 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Editor and the two anonymous referees for their insightful comments on prior versions of this article. The authors would like also to thank Consuelo Gastaldo for her support in the earlier steps of the research process.

References

Only the references cited in the text are provided. The complete list of the references used for this study is available on request (from the authors).

  1. Andaleeb, S. S.: 1992, ‘The Trust Concept: Research Issues for Channels of Distribution’, Research in Marketing, 11, 1-34.Google Scholar
  2. Andaleeb, S. S.: 1995, ‘Dependence Relations and the Moderating Role of Trust: Implications for Behavioral Intentions in Marketing Channel’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 157-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audi, R.: 2008, ‘Some Dimensions of Trust in Business Practices: From Financial and Product Representation to Licensure and Voting’, Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 97-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B.: 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust, (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  5. Berg, B. L.: 1995, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, (Allyn and Bacon, Boston), 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  6. Boyatzis, R. E.: 1998, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  7. Brien, A.: 1998, ‘Professional Ethics and The Culture of Trust’, Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 391-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi, C. Eldomiaty, T. and S. Kim, 2007, ‘Consumer Trust, Social Marketing and Ethics of Welfare Exchange’, Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 17-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crosby, L. A. Evans, K. R. and D. Cowles: 1990, ‘Relationship Quality in Service Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective’, Journal of Marketing, 54 (July), 68-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dwyer, F.R. and S. Oh: 1987, ‘Output Sector Munificence Effects on the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channels’, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(November), 347-358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr P. H. and S. Oh: 1987, ‘Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships’, Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 11-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan, D.P.: 1997, ‘Computer content analysis of press coverage and prediction of public opinion for the 1995 sovereignty referendum in Quebec’, Social Science Computer Review, 15(4), 351-366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gambetta, D.: 1988, ‘Can we Trust?’, in D. Gambetta (ed)., Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, (Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford).Google Scholar
  14. Ganesan, S.: 1994, ‘Determinants of Long- Term Orientation in Buyer–Seller Relationships’, Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Marzá, D.: 2005, ‘Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing’, Journal of Business Ethics, 57(3), 209-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garfield, E.: 1979, Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and the Humanities, (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  17. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp J. B. and N. Kumar: 1998, ‘Generalizations about Trust in Marketing Channel Relationships Using Meta-Analysis’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(3), 223-248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustafsson, C.: 2005, ‘Trust as an Instance of Asymmetrical Reciprocity: An Ethics Perspective on Corporate Brand Management’, Business Ethics, 14(2), 142-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kramer, R.M. and T.R. Tyler (eds.): 1996, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  20. Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The structure of scientific revolutions, (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, second edition).Google Scholar
  21. Lane, C. and R. Bachmann (eds.): 1998, Trust Within and Between Organizations. Conceptual Issues and Empirical Analysis, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  22. Lane, P. J., Koka B. R. and S. Pathak: 2006, ‘The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct’, Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.Google Scholar
  23. Luhmann, N.: 1979, Trust and Power, (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  24. Mayer, R. C., Davis J. H. and F. D. Schoorman: 1995, ‘An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust’, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McAllister, D. J.: 1995, ‘Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1). 24-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merton, R.K.: 1973, The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  27. Moorman, C., Deshpandé R. and G. Zaltman: 1992, ‘Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: the Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations’, Journal of Marketing Research, 29(August), 314-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moorman, C., Deshpandé R. and G. Zaltman: 1993, ‘Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships’, Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 81-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morgan, R. M. and S. D. Hunt: 1994, ‘The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 58(July), 20-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pruitt, D.G.: 1981, Negotiation Behavior, (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  31. Pučėtaitė, R. and A.M. Lämsä: 2008, ‘Developing Organizational Trust Through Advancement of Employees’ Work Ethic in a Post-Socialist Context’, Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 325-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ross, W.T. and D.C. Robertson: 2007, ‘Compound Relationships Between Firms’, Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 108-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rotter, J. B.: 1967, ‘A New Scale for Measurement of Interpersonal Trust’, Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rousseau, D. M and R. J House: 1994, ‘Meso Organizational Behavior: Avoiding Three Fundamental Biases’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1: 13-30.Google Scholar
  35. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin S. B., Burt R. S. and C. Camerer: 1998, ‘Not so Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust’, Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.Google Scholar
  36. Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H.: 2007, ‘An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future’, Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), pp. 344–354.Google Scholar
  37. Small, B. and M. Mallon: 2007, ‘Science, Society, Ethics, and Trust’, International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(1), 103-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Svensson, G: 2001, ‘Extending Trust and Mutual Trust in Business Relationships Towards a Synchronised Trust Chain in Marketing Channels’, Management Decision, 39(6), 431-440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Swan, J. E., Bowers M. R. and L. D. Richardson: 1999, ‘Customer Trust in the Salesperson: An Integrative Review and Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature’, Journal of Business Research, 44(3), 93-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vigoda-Gadot, E.: 2007, ‘Citizens’ Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration: A Five-Year National Study of Their Relationship to Satisfaction with Services, Trust in Governance, and Voice Orientations’, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 17(2), 285-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust: 1994, Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. White, T. I.: 1998, ‘Sexual Harassment: Trust and the Ethic of Care’, Business & Society Review, 100(101), 9-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandro Castaldo
    • 1
  • Katia Premazzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fabrizio Zerbini
    • 1
  1. 1.SDA Bocconi School of ManagementBocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations