Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 96, Issue 3, pp 435–451 | Cite as

Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence from Taiwan

  • Cheng-Li Huang
  • Fan-Hua Kung
Article

Abstract

This article investigates stakeholder expectations associated with corporate environmental disclosure. Several articles have studied the effect that stakeholder pressure has on environmental disclosing strategies. In this article, we extend previous research to an examination of the influence of external, internal, and intermediary stakeholder groups or constituencies in turn to clarify the demands of multiple stakeholders as to firms’ disclosure of sufficient and adequate environmental information. The sample comprised Taiwanese firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Our results show that the level of environmental disclosure is significantly affected by stakeholder groups’ demands. External stakeholder groups, such as the government, debtors, and consumers, exert a strong influence over management intentions regarding the extent of environmental disclosure. Internal stakeholder groups, such as shareholders and employees, impose additional pressures on firms to disclose environmental information. As for intermediate stakeholder groups, environmental protection organizations, and accounting firms, these can greatly influence managerial choices regarding their environmental disclosure strategies.

Key words

environmental disclosure stakeholder expectations stakeholder analysis environmental accounting disclosure strategy Taiwan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts, W. and D. Cormier: 2009, ‘Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(1), 1-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, K. and J. K. Courtis: 1999, ‘Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: A meta-analysis’, The British Accounting Review 31(1), 35-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alnajjar, F. K.: 2000, ‘Determinants of social responsibility disclosures of U.S. Fortune 500 firms: An application of content analysis’, Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management 1, 163-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bewley, K., Y. Li: 2000, ‘Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective’, Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management 1, 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blacconiere, W. G. and D. M. Patten: 1994, ‘Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(3), 357-377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen, R.M., L. Ducharme and D. Shores: 1995. ‘Stakeholders’ implicit claims and accounting method choice’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3), 255–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brammer, S. and S.Pavelin: 2006, ‘Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33(7-8), 1168-1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, N. and C. Deegan: 1998, ‘The public disclosure of environmental performance information- A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory’, Accounting & Business Research 29(1), 21-41.Google Scholar
  9. Cho, C. H. and D. M. Patten: 2007, ‘The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(7-8), 639-647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D. Richardson and F. P. Vasvari: 2008, ‘Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(4-5), 303-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier, P. M.: 2008, ‘Stakeholder accountability: A field study of the implementation of a governance improvement plan’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21(7), 933-953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cormier, D., I. M. Gordon and M. Magnan: 2004, ‘Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management’s perceptions with reality’, Journal of Business Ethics 49(2), 143-165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cormier, D., M. Magnan: 2003, ‘Environmental reporting management: a European perspective’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowen, S. S., L. B. Ferrei and L. D. Parker: 1987, ‘The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(2), 111-122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deegan, C.: 2002, ‘Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures– A theoretical foundation’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3), 282-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deegan, C. and B. Gordon: 1996, ‘A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations’, Accounting & Business Research 26(3), 187-199.Google Scholar
  17. Deegan, C. and M. Rankin: 1996, ‘Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?: An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9(2), 50-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eng, L. L. and Y. T. Mak: 2003, ‘Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 22(4), 325-345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedman, M. and C. Wasley: 1990, ‘The association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure in annual reports and 10Ks’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3, 183-193.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (Pitman Publishing Inc, Marshfield, MA).Google Scholar
  22. Feeman, R. E., J. E. Harrison and A. C. Wicks: 2007, Managing for stakeholders: Survival, Reputation and Success (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  23. Gale, B. T.: 1972, ‘Market share and rate of return’, The Review of Economics & Statistics 54(4), 412-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray, R., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers: 1995, ‘Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2), 44-77.Google Scholar
  25. Gronhaug, K. and T. Fredriksen: 1988, ‘Concentration ratios, strategy and performance: The case of the Norwegian Telecommunications’, Managerial and Decision Economics 19(4), 257-263.Google Scholar
  26. Halme, M. and M. Huse: 1997, ‘The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting’, Scandinavian Journal of Management 13(2), 137-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill, C. W. L. and T. M. Jones: 1992, ‘Stakeholder-agency theory’, Journal of Management Studies 29(2), 131-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hossain, M., L. M. Tan and M. B. Adams: 1994, ‘Voluntary disclosure in an emerging capital market: some empirical evidence from companies listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange’, The International Journal of Accounting 29(4), 334-351.Google Scholar
  29. Ingram, R. W. and K. B. Frazier: 1980, ‘Environmental performance and corporate disclosure’, Journal of Accounting Research 18(2), 614-622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ip, P-K.: 2008, ‘Corporate social responsibility and crony capitalism in Taiwan’, Journal of Business Ethics 79(1-2), 167-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics’, Academy of Management Review 20(2), 404-437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keim, G. D.: 1978, ‘Managerial behavior and the social responsibility debate: Goals versus constraints’, Academy of Management 21(1), 57-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, Y., G. D. Richardson and D. B. Thornton: 1997, ‘Corporate disclosure of environmental liability information: theory and evidence’, Contemporary Accounting Research 14 (3), 435–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGuire, J., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal 31, 854-872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Menon, K. and D. D. Williams: 1991, ‘Auditor credibility and initial public offerings’, The Accounting Review 66(2), 313-332.Google Scholar
  36. Mills, D. and M. Gardner: 1984, ‘Financial profiles and the disclosure of expenditures for socially responsible purposes’, Journal of Business Research 12, 407-424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neu, D., H. Warsame and K. Pedwell: 1998. ‘Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Donovan, G.: 2002, ‘Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3), 344-371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Park, O.: 1999, ‘Japanese Corporate Environmental Disclosure’, Keizai-Kagaku 47(3), 21–37 [in Japanese].Google Scholar
  41. Patten, D. M.: 1991, ‘Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10(4), 297-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patten, D.M.: 1992. ‘Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (5), 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patten, D. M.: 2002, ‘The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(8), 763-773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts, R. W.: 1992, ‘Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6), 595-612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar, R. M. Brown, J. J. Janney and K. Paul: 2001, ‘An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 32(2), 143-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Teoh, S. H. and T. J. Wong: 1993, ‘Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient’, The Accounting Review 68(2), 346-366.Google Scholar
  47. Toms, J. S.: 2002, ‘Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence’, British Accounting Review 34(3), 257-282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ullmann, A. A.: 1985, ‘Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540-557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walden, W. D. and B. N. Schwartz: 1997, ‘Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16(2), 125-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watkins, A. L., W. Hillison and S. E. Morecroft: 2004, ‘Audit quality: A synthesis of theory and empirical evidence’, Journal of Accounting Literature 23(1), 153-193.Google Scholar
  51. Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman: 1986, Positive accounting theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  52. Wernerfelt, B.: 1984, ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 5(2), 171-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiseman, J.: 1982, ‘An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1), 53-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountingTamkang UniversityTamsui, TaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations