Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 96, Issue 2, pp 169–186 | Cite as

Alliances Between Brands and Social Causes: The Influence of Company Credibility on Social Responsibility Image

  • Enrique Bigné Alcañiz
  • Ruben Chumpitaz Cáceres
  • Rafael Currás PérezEmail author
Article

Abstract

This research extends previous findings related to the positive influence of company credibility on a social Cause–Brand Alliance’s (CBA) persuasion mechanism. This study analyzes the mediating role of two dimensions of company credibility (trustworthiness and expertise) with regard to the influence of altruistic attributions and two types of brand–cause fit (functional and image fit) on corporate social responsibility image. A structural equation model tests the proposed framework with a sample of 299 consumers, and the results suggest that (1) image fit and altruistic attribution are cues that consumers use to evaluate company trustworthiness when linking to a social cause; (2) functional fit significantly influences perceived company expertise but not trustworthiness; and (3) trustworthiness has more weight than expertise in judgments about corporate social responsibility.

Keywords

company expertise company trustworthiness functional fit image fit altruistic attributions CSR image 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaker, D. (2005), Strategic Market Management (7th ed.). John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, D. and Brown, P. (1972), “Evaluating vehicle source effects”, Journal of Advertising Research 12(4), 11-16.Google Scholar
  3. Aaker, D. and Keller, K. (1990), “Consumer evaluations of brand extensions”, Journal of Marketing 54(1), 27-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. and Gerbing, D. (1988), “The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels: a review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin 103, 411-423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. and Yi, J. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(2), 74-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barone, M., A. Miyazaki and K. Taylor: 2000, ‘The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2), 248–262.Google Scholar
  7. Barone, M., Norman, A. and Miyazaki, A. (2007), “Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: is more fit better?”, Journal of Retailing 83(4), 437-445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basil, D. Z. and Herr, P. M. (2006), “Attitudinal balance and Cause-Related Marketing: An empirical application of balance theory”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 391-403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batra, R. and Ray, M. (1986), “Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising”, Journal of Consumer Research 13(September), 234-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker-Olsen, K., Cudmore, A. and Hill, R (2006), “The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour”, Journal of Business Research 59(1), 46-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bentler P (2005) EQS 6: Structural Equation Program Manual. Multivariate software: Encino CA.Google Scholar
  12. Bentler, P. and Bonnet, D. (1980), “Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures”, Psychological Bulletin 88, 588-606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berger, I., Cunningham, P. and Kozinets, R. (1999), “Consumer persuasion through cause-related advertising”, Advances in Consumer Research 26, 491-497.Google Scholar
  14. Boxenbaum, E. (2006), “Corporate social responsibility as institutional hybrids”, Journal of Business Strategies 23(1), 45-63.Google Scholar
  15. Brammer, S. and Millington, A. (2006), “Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis”, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(1), 6-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. BSR/Cone: 2008, Corporate Responsibility in a New World Survey, Business for Social Responsibility (BSR) and Cone LLC, http://www.bsr.org/files/BSR_Cone_2008_Survey.pdf. Accessed 24 November 2009
  17. Buhl, L. (1996), “The ethical framework of corporate philanthropy”, in Burlingame, D. and Young, D. (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 23-129.Google Scholar
  18. Carroll, A. (1979), “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chaiken, S. (1980), “Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chou, C., Bentler, P., Satorra, A. (1991), “Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: a Monte Carlo study”, The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 44(2), 347-357.Google Scholar
  21. Cornwell, T. B., Weeks and C. Roy, D. (2005),”Sponsorship-linked marketing: opening the blackbox”, Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 23-45.Google Scholar
  22. Cui, Y., Trent, E., Sullivan, P. and Matiru, G. (2003), “Cause-related marketing: how generation Y responds”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 31(6), 310-320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dean, D. (2002), “Associating the corporation with a charitable event trough sponsorship: measuring the effects on corporate community relations”, Journal of Advertising 31(4), 77-87.Google Scholar
  24. Dean, D. (2003), “Consumer perceptions of corporate donations: effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation”, Journal of Advertising 32(4), 91-102.Google Scholar
  25. Drumwright, M. (1996), “Company advertising with a social dimension: the role of noneconomic criteria”, Journal of Marketing 60(4), 71-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sen, S. (2007), “Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning”, International Journal of Research in Marketing 24(3), 224-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dutton, J., Dukerich, J. and Harquail, C. (1994), “Organizational images and member identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2), 239-263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellen, P., Mohr, L, and Webb, D. (2000), “Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix?”, Journal of Retailing 76(3), 393-406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ellen, P., Webb, D. and Mohr, L. (2006), “Building Corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2), 147-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Erdem, T. and Swait, J. (1998), “Brand equity as a signalling phenomenon”, Journal of Consumer Psychology 7(2), 131-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Erdem, T. and Swait, J. (2004), “Brand credibility, brand consideration and choice”, Journal of Consumer Research 31(1), 191-198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Erdem, T. and Swait, J. and Valenzuela, A. (2006), “Brands as signals: a cross-country validation study”, Journal of Marketing 70(January), 34-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Feldman, J. and Lynch, J. (1988), “Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour”, Journal of Applied Psychology 73(3), 421-435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Folkes, V. (1988), “Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: a review and new directions”, Journal of Consumer Research 14(March), 548-565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forehand, M. and Grier, S. (2003), “When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism”, Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(3), 349-356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. (1981), “Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Freestone, O. and McGoldrick, P. (2008), “Motivations of the ethical consumer”, Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445-467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Friestad, M. and Wright, P. (1994), “The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts”, Journal of Consumer Research 21(1), 1-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goldberg, M. and Hartwick, J. (1990), “The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness”, Journal of Consumer Research 17(2), 172-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldsmith, R., Lafferty, B. and Newell, S. (2000), “The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands”, Journal of Advertising 29(3), 43-54.Google Scholar
  41. Graafland, J. and van den Ven, B. (2006), “Strategic and moral motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility”, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 111-123.Google Scholar
  42. Gupta, S. and Pirsch, J. (2006), “The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing”, Journal of Consumer Marketing 23(6), 314-326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gwinner, K. (1997), “A model of image creation and image transfer in event sponsorship”, International Marketing Review 14(3), 145-158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gwinner, K. and Eaton, J. (1999), “Building brand image through event sponsorship: the role of image transfer”, Journal of Advertising 28(4), 47-57.Google Scholar
  45. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R (2005) Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.Google Scholar
  46. Heider, F. (1958), The psychology of interpersonal relations, John Wiley & Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoeffler, S. and Keller, K (2002), “Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 21(1), 78-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hovland, C., Janis, I. and Kelley, H. (1953), Communication and Persuasion. Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  49. Hu, L., Bentler, P. and Kano, Y. (1992), “Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?”, Psychological Bulletin 112, 351-362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hunt. S. and Vitell, S. (1986), “A general theory of marketing ethics”, Journal of Macromarketing, 6(Spring), 5-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hunt. S. and Vitell, S. (2006), “The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions”, Journal of Macromarketing, 26(December), 1-11.Google Scholar
  52. Keim, G. (1978), “Corporate social responsibility: an assessment of the enlightened self-interest model”, Academy of Management Journal, 3(1), 32-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keller, K. and Aaker, D. (1992), “The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions”, Journal of Marketing Research 29(February), 35-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kelley, H. (1973), “The process of causal attribution”, American Psychologist, 28(2), 107-128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim, H. J., Kim, J. and Han. W. (2005), “The effects of Cause-Related Marketing on company and brand attitudes”, Seoul Journal of Business 11(2), 83-117.Google Scholar
  56. Klein, J. and Dawar, N. (2004), “Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis”, International Journal of Research in Marketing 21, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lafferty, B. (2007), “The relevance of fit in a cause-brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility”, Journal of Business Research 60, 447-453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lafferty, B. and Goldsmith, R. (2005), “Cause-brand alliances: does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause?”, Journal of Business Research 58, 423-429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lafferty, B., Goldsmith, R. and Hult, T. (2004), “The impact of the alliance on the partners: a look at cause-brand alliances”, Psychology & Marketing 21(7), 509-531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. L’Etang, J. (1994), “Public relations and corporate social responsibility: Some issues arising”, Journal of Business Ethics, 13(2), 111-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lichtenstein, D., Drumwright, M. and Braig, B. (2004), “The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits”, Journal of Marketing 68(1), 16-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Maathuis, O., Rodenburg, J. and Sikkel, D. (2004), “Credibility, emotion or reason?”, Corporate Reputation Review 6(4), 333-345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Maignan, I. and Ferrell, O. (2001), “Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: concept, evidence and research directions”, European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457-484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Margolis H (1984) Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
  65. Marín, L. and Ruiz, S. (2007), “I need you too! Corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics 71, 245-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McDonald, C. (1991), “The image of sponsor”, European Journal of Marketing 25(11), 31-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McEnally, M. and de Chernatony, L. (1999), “The evolving nature of branding: consumer and managerial implications”, Academy of Marketing Science Review 6, 5-16.Google Scholar
  68. McGuire, W. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In: Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E. (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. II. Radon House, New York.Google Scholar
  69. Menon, S. and Kahn, B. (2003), “Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: when do they impact perception of sponsor brand?”, Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(3), 316-327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Newell, S. and Goldsmith, R. (2001), “The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility”, Journal of Business Research 52, 235-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nunnally, J. and Bernstein, I. (1994), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Ohanian, R. (1990), “Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness”, Journal of Advertising 19, 39-52.Google Scholar
  73. Osterhus, T. (1997), “Pro-social consumer influence strategies: when and how do they work?”, Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 16-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Petty, R., Cacioppo, J. and Schumann, D. (1983), “Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement”, Journal of Consumer Research 10(2), 135-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Polonsky, M. and Speed, R. (2001), “Linking sponsorship and cause related marketing. Complementarities and conflicts”, European Journal of Marketing 35(11/12), 1361-1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pracejus, J. and Olsen, D. (2004), “The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns”, Journal of Business Research, 57, 635-640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ptacek, J. J., and G. Salazar (1997), “Enlightened self-interest: Selling business on the benefits of cause-related marketing”, Nonprofit World, 15(4), 9-13.Google Scholar
  78. Rifon, N., Choi, S., Trimble, C. and Li, H. (2001), “Congruence effects in sponsorship: the mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive”, Journal of Advertising 33(1), 29-42.Google Scholar
  79. Robin, D. and Reidenbach, E. (1987), “Social responsibility, ethics and marketing strategy: closing the gap between concept y application”, Journal of marketing, 51(1), 44-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roy, D. and Cornwell, B. (2001), “The influence of consumer knowledge on responses to event sponsorships”, Psychology & Marketing 21(3), 185-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rumelhart, D. (1980), “Schemata: the building blocks of cognition”, in Spiro, R., Bruce, B. and Brewer, W. (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  82. Satorra, A. and Bentler, P. (1994), “Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis”, in von Eye, A. and Clogg, C. (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: applications for developmental research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  83. Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001), “Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility”, Journal of Marketing Research 38(2), 225-243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Simmons, C. and Becker-Olsen, K. (2006), “Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships”, Journal of Marketing 70(October), 154-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith, W. and M. Higgins (2000), “Cause-Related Marketing: Ethics and the Ecstatic”, Business and Society, 39(3), 304-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sparks, J. and Y. Pan: 2009, ‘Ethical Judgements in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda’, Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0092-2.
  87. Speed, R. and Thompson, P. (2000), “Determinants of sports sponsorship response”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(2), 226-238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Strahilevitz, M. (2003), “The effects of prior impressions of a firm’s ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: Do the good look better while the bad look worse?”, Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 11(1), 77-92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Strahilevitz, M. and Myers, J. (1998), “Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell”, Journal of Consumer Research 24(4), 434-446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1979), “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict”, in Austin, W. and Worchel, S. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterrey.Google Scholar
  91. Till, B. and Busler, M.. (2000), “The match-up hypothesis: physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs”, Journal of Advertising 29(3), 1-13.Google Scholar
  92. Till, B. and Nowak, L. (2000), “Toward effective use of cause-related marketing strategies”, Journal of Product & Brand Management 9(7), 472-484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Titus, P. and Bradford, J. (1996). “Reflections on consumer sophistication and its impact on ethical business practice”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 30(1), 170-195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Trimble, C. and Rifon, N. (2006), “Consumer perceptions of compatibility in cause-related marketing messages”, International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing 11(1), 29-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Varadarajan, R. and Menon, A. (1988), “Cause-Related Marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy”, Journal of Marketing 52(3), 58-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Webb, D. and Mohr, L. (1998), “A typology of consumer responses to Cause-Related Marketing; from skeptics to socially concerned”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 17(2), 226-238.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique Bigné Alcañiz
    • 1
  • Ruben Chumpitaz Cáceres
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rafael Currás Pérez
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of MarketingUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.IESEG School of Management, CNRS-LEM (UMR 8179)Lille Catholic UniversityLilleFrance
  3. 3.ESAN UniversityLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations