Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility: Is it Rewarded by the Corporate Bond Market? A Critical Note

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) has a positive impact on firm value has been almost exclusively analysed from the perspective of the stock market. We have therefore investigated the relationship between the valuation of Euro corporate bonds and the standards of CSR of mainly European companies for the first time in this article. Generally, the debt market exhibits a considerable weight for corporate finance, for which reason creditors should basically play a significant role in the transmission of CSR into the valuation of financial instruments. Given that socially responsible firms are often regarded as economically more successful and less risky, they should have lower risk premia. The results of the empirical analysis, however, reveal that based on an extensive data panel the risk premium for socially responsible firms – according to the classification by SAM Group – was ceterius paribus higher than for non-socially responsible companies. However, only one case of the models investigated was weakly significant. Thus, largely the relationship has to be classified as marginal; so CSR has apparently not yet been incorporated into the pricing of corporate bonds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G., 1980, A Theory of Social Custom, of Which Unemployment May be One Consequence, Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, pp. 749-775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. and H. Demsetz, 1972, Production, information costs, and economic organization, American Economic Review 62, pp. 777-795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G., A. Edwards and M. Ferri, 2000, What Does the Nasdaq’s High-Yield Bond Market Reveal about Bondholder-Stockholder Conflict?, Financial Management 30, pp. 23-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, J. V. and E. M. Remolona: 2003, ‘The Credit Risk Premium Puzzle’, BIS Quarterly Review December, 57–72.

  • Arellano, M., 1987, Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49, pp. 431-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. and J. Wurgler, 2002, Market Timing and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance 57, pp. 1- 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., 2001, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B.M. and T. Odean, 2000, Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors, Journal of Finance 55, pp. 773-806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassen, A., K. Meyer and J. Schlange: 2006, The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Capital – An Empirical Analysis. Working Paper, Universität Hamburg.

  • Beck, N. and J. Katz, 1995, What to do (and not do do) with time-series cross-section data, American Political Science Review 89, pp. 634-647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, L. H. H., G. M. H. Mertens, R. H. G. Meuwissen, J. J. F. van Raak and C. Schelleman: 2005, Classification and Analysis of Major European Business Failures. MARC Research Report, University Maastricht, Erasmus University.

  • Bradley, M., D. Chen, G. Dallas and E. Snyderwine: 2007, The Relation Between Corporate Governance and Credit Risk, Bond Yields and Firm Valuation. Working Paper, Duke University.

  • Buchanan, B. and T. Yang, 2005, The Benefits and Costs of Controlling Shareholders: the Rise and Fall of Parmalat, Research in International Business and Finance 19, pp. 27-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, B. and A. Shapiro: 1987, Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management 16, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouhy, M., Galai, D. and R. Mark, 2001, Prototype risk rating system. Journal of Banking and Finance 25, pp. 47-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M. and J. G. March, 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice Halls: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derwall, J., Gunster, N., Bauer, R. and Koedijk, 2005, The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle, Financial Analyst Journal 61, pp. 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bundesbank: 2004, Neuere Entwicklungen am Markt für Unternehmensanleihen, Monatsbericht, April, pp. 15–26.

  • Di Giulio, A., P. O. Migliavacca and A. Tencati: 2007, What Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and the Cost of Capital. Working Paper, Bocconi University.

  • Drakos, K., 2001, Fixed Income Excess Returns and Time to Maturity, International Review of Financial Analysis 10, pp. 431-442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECB: 2007, Corporate Finance in the Euro Area. Occasional Paper Series No. 63, June, Frankfurt.

  • Ederington, L. H. and J. Yawitz: 1987, ‘The Bond Rating Process’, in E. I. Altman and M. J. McKinney (Hrsg.), Handbook of Financial Markets and Institutions (John Wiley and Sons, New York), pp. 23.3–23.57.

  • Elster, J., 1998, Emotions and Economic Theory, Journal of Economic Literature 36, pp. 47-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, B., Knoop, C. and A. Sesia, 2005, The Equator Principles: An industry approach to managing environmental and social risks, Harvard Business School Case Study 9, pp. 205-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2002, Communication on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development, European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Sustainable and Responsible Investment Forum (Eurosif): 2006, Socially Responsible Investment Among European Institutional Investors.

  • Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, 1993, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, pp. 3-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. and M. Jensen, 1983, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, pp. 301-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and A. Falk, 1999, Wage Rigidities in a Competitive Incomplete Contract Market, Journal of Political Economy 107, pp. 106-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and S. Gächter, 2000, Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14, pp. 154-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. and S. Gächter, 2002, Altruistic punishment in humans, Nature 415, pp. 137-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., 1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, The Stanford University Press: Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, H. G., and F. J. Fabozzi, 1985, Fixed Income Portfolio Management. Dow Jones-Irwin: Homewood, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fons, J.: 1994, ‘Using Default Rates to Model the Term Structure of Credit Risk’, Financial Analysts Journal 50, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geczy, C., R. F. Stambaugh and D. Levin: 2005, Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Godfrey, P., 2005, The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: a Risk Management Perspective, Academy of Management Review 30, pp. 777-798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon, 1997, The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research, Business & Society 36, pp. 5-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundfest, J. A., 1993, Just Vote No: A Minimalist Strategy for Dealing with Barbarians Inside the Gates, Stanford Law Review 45, pp. 857-937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R. and B. Schwarze, 1982, An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, pp. 367-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M. and J. Hazelton, 2004, Financial Markets, A Tool for Social Responsibility?, Journal of Business Ethics 52, pp. 62-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinkel, R., Krause, A. and J. Zechner, 2001, The effect of green investment on corporate behaviour, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35, pp. 431-449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R., 1939, Value and Capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory, Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. and M. Kacperczyk: 2005, The Price of Sin: The Effect of Social Norms of Markets. Working Paper, Princeton University.

  • HSBC: 2009, HSBC Holdings Plc Sustainability Report 2008. HSBC Holdings Plc, London, UK.

  • Jensen, M., 2001, Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14, pp. 8-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, D. B., 2003, Socially Responsible Investing, A Critical Appraisal, Journal of Business Ethics 43, pp. 219-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Ritov, I. and D. Schkade, 1998, Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions? An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, pp. 220-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1982, The psychology of preferences, Scientific American 246, pp. 160-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, D. L.: 2000, ‘Estimating and Pricing Credit Risk: An Overview’, Financial Analysts Journal 56, 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. and C. McLaughlin, 1996, The impact of environmental management on firm performance, Management Science 42, pp. 1199–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner, K., 2005, Policy Making and the Role of Government Changing Governance Patterns and CSR, Corporate Governance 5, pp. 151-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, P.R. and S. C. Mann, 2005, Professional Trader Discipline and Trade Disposition, Journal of Financial Economics 76, pp. 401-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff, F. A. and E. Schwartz, 1995, A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Fixed and Floating Rate Debt, Journal of Finance 50, pp. 789-820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J.D. and J.P. Walsh, 2001, People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance, Lawrence Elbaum, Mahwah, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J.D. and J.P. Walsh, 2003, Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business, Administrative Science Quarterly 48, pp. 268-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A. and T. Schneeweiss, 1988, Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance, Academy of Management Journal 31, pp. 854-872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel, 2000, Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21, 603-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz, K-M. and M. Nelles, 2006, Corporate Governance und Credit Spreads, Finanz Betrieb 8, pp. 628-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer: 2007, The Language of Responsible Investment – An Industry Guide to Key Terms and Organisations. Mercer Investment Consulting, London.

  • Merrill Lynch: 2000, Merrill Lynch Global Bond Indices-Rules of Construction and Calculation Methodology. Merrill Lynch & Co.

  • Merton, R. C., 1974, On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, Journal of Finance 29, pp. 449-470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks, R. and N. Minnow, 1995, Watching the Watchers: Corporate Governance for the Twenty-first Century, Blackwell: Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf, 1984, Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information Investors do not have, Journal of Financial Economics 13, pp. 187-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelles, M. and K-M. Menz, 2007, Die empirische Bewertung von Euro-Unternehmens anleihen – Eine panelökonometrische Analyse, Finanz Betrieb 9, pp. 513-523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelles, M. and K-M. Menz, 2008, Corporate Governance und Credit Spreads – Korrelation, Kausalität oder weder noch? Forschungspapier, Universität Wuppertal.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, J. and R. Thamotheram: 2006, Enhanced Analytics for a New Generation of Investor – How the Investment Industry Can Use Extra-Financial Factors in Investing. Working Paper, USS Ltd.

  • Orlitzky, M. and J.D. Benjamin, 2001, Corporate social performance and firm risk: A metaanalytic review, Business & Society 40, pp. 369-396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. and S. Rynes, 2003, Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis, Organization Studies 24, pp. 403-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Hager & North: 2007, Does Socially Responsible Investing Hurt Investment Returns? Research Paper, Phillips, Hager & North Investment Management Ltd., Vancouver.

  • Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. and S. Sachs, 2002, Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view, California Management Review 45, pp. 6-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L.E. and D.P. O’Bannon, 1997, The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis, Business and Society 36, pp. 419-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A., 1986, Creating Shareholder Value. The Free Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, L., Ter Horst J. and C. Zhang, 2008, Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior, Journal of Banking and Finance 32, pp. 1723-1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B., 2006, Finance as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics 68, pp. 19-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B., 2008, A Note on the Interaction between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance, Ecological Economics 68, pp. 46-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, M., 2005, Is There a Difference? The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indexes, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 05-50, July.

  • Schultz, P., 2001, Corporate bond trading costs and practices: a peek behind the curtain, Journal of Finance 56, pp. 677-698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M., 1996, The Construct Validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg and Domini Social Performance Rating Data, Journal of Business Ethics 15, pp. 287-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J., 2000, Conversation, information and herd behaviour, American Economic Review 85, pp. 181-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A.: 2004, Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior? In American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 94, pp. 414–418.

  • Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1986, Large Shareholders and Corporate Control, Journal of Political Economy 96, pp. 461-488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., 1955, A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, pp. 99-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., 1957, Models of Man: Social and Rational, John Wiley & Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.P., 1996, Shareholder Activism by Institutional Investors. Evidence from CalPERS, Journal of Finance 51, pp. 227-252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soppe, A., 2004, Sustainable Corporate Finance, Journal of Business Ethics 53, pp. 213-224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, B.H., 1978, Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure: An Empirical Study, The Accounting Review 53, pp. 94 -111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M., 2006, Socially Responsible Indexes: Composition, Performance, and Tracking Error, Journal of Portfolio Management 32, pp. 100-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, U., Ionescu-Somers, A. and O. Salzmann, 2007, The Economic Foundations of Corporate Sustainability, Corporate Governance 7, pp. 162-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sufi, A., 2009, The real effects of debt certification: evidence from the introduction of bank loan ratings, Review of Financial Studies 22, pp. 1659-1691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J., 2001, Corporate governance,. Econometrica 69, pp. 1-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R., 1971, The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism, Quarterly Review of Biology 46, pp. 35-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R., 1985, Social Evolution, Benjamin/Cummings: Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. D., 2004, Can Homo Economicus Follow Kant’s Categorial Imperative? Journal of Socio-Economics 33, pp. 89-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G., 1964, Review of ‘A Behavioral Theory of the Firm’, American Economic Review 54, pp. 144-148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus-Michael Menz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menz, KM. Corporate Social Responsibility: Is it Rewarded by the Corporate Bond Market? A Critical Note. J Bus Ethics 96, 117–134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0452-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0452-y

Keywords

Navigation