Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 95, Issue 4, pp 571–601 | Cite as

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm Performance of Indian Companies?

  • Supriti Mishra
  • Damodar Suar
Article

Abstract

This study examines whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) towards primary stakeholders influences the financial and the non-financial performance (NFP) of Indian firms. Perceptual data on CSR and NFP were collected from 150 senior-level Indian managers including CEOs through questionnaire survey. Hard data on financial performance (FP) of the companies were obtained from secondary sources. A questionnaire for assessing CSR was developed with respect to six stakeholder groups – employees, customers, investors, community, natural environment, and suppliers. A composite measure of CSR was obtained by aggregating the six dimensions. Findings indicate that stock-listed firms show responsible business practices and better FP than the non-stock-listed firms. Controlling confounding effects of stock-listing, ownership, and firm size, a favorable perception of managers towards CSR is found to be associated with increase in FP and NFP of firms. Such findings hold good when CSR is assessed for the six stakeholder groups in aggregate and for each stakeholder group in segregate. Findings suggest that responsible business practices towards primary stakeholders can be profitable and beneficial to Indian firms.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility financial performance non-financial performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaker, D.: 1994, ‘Building a Brand: The Saturn Story’, California Management Review 36 (2), 114 - 121.Google Scholar
  2. Agle, B.R., R.K. Mitchell, and J.A Sonnenfield: 1999, ‘Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values’, Academy of Management Journal 42 (5), 507 - 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, N. Z., R. V. Montagno and R. J. Firenze: 1998, ‘Organizational Performance and Environmental Consciousness: An Empirical Study’, Management Decision 36 (2), 57- 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, F. E.: 11 August 1992, ‘Reducing Toxic Waste Produces Quick Results’, The Wall Street Journal B1 Google Scholar
  5. Alshimmiri, T.: 2004, ‘Board Composition, Executive Remuneration and Corporate Performance: The Case of REITS’, Corporate Ownership and Control 2 (1), 104 -119.Google Scholar
  6. Alvarez, G. M. J., J. J. Burgos and L. J. J. Cespedes: 2001, ‘An Analysis of Environmental Management, Organizational Context and Performance of Spanish Hotels’, Omega 29 (6), 457 - 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, J. C. and A. W. Frankle: 1980, ‘Voluntary Social Reporting: An Iso-beta Portfolio Analysis’, The Accounting Review 55 (3), 467 - 479.Google Scholar
  8. Arora, B. and R. Puranik: 2004, ‘A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility in India’, Development 47 (3), 93 - 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashforth, B. E. and F. Mael: 1989, ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’, Academy of Management Review 14 (1), 20 - 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll and J. D. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Review 28 (2), 446 - 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barney J. B. and M. H. Hansen: 1994, ‘Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage’, Strategic Management Journal (Winter Special Issue) 15, 175 - 190.Google Scholar
  12. Barrett, S.: 1992, ‘Strategy and the Environment’, Columbia Journal of World Business 27 (3/4), 202 - 209.Google Scholar
  13. Belal, A.: 2001, ‘A Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in Bangladesh’, Managerial Auditing Journal 15 (5), 274 - 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Belk, .R. W.: 1988, ‘Possessions and the Extended Self’’, Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2), 139 - 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benito, J. G. and G. Benito: 2005, ‘Environmental Proactivity and Business Performance: An Empirical Analysis’, Omega 33 (1), 1 - 15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berman, S. L., A. C. Wicks, S. Kotha and T. M. Jones: 1999, ‘Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 42 (5), 488 - 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Black, B. S. and V. S. Khanna: 2007, ‘Can Corporate Governance Reforms Increase Firms’ Market Values? Evidence from India’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (4), 749 - 796.Google Scholar
  18. Boardman, A. E. and A. R. Vining: 1989, ‘Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments’, Journal of Law and Economics 32 (1), 1 - 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boli, J. and D. Hartsuiker: 2001, ‘World Culture and Transnational Corporations: Sketch of a Project’, Paper Presented at the International Conference on Effects of and Responses to Globalization, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  20. Bollen, K. A.: 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  21. Bollen, K. and R. Lenox: 1991, ‘Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective’, Psychological Bulletin 110 (2), 305 - 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bouchard, T. J., Jr.: 1976, ‘Unobtrusive Measures: An Inventory of Uses’, Sociological Methods and Research 4 (3), 267 - 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Boulding, W. and M. A. Kirmani: 1993, ‘A Consumer Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality?’, Journal of Consumer Research 20 (1), 111 - 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. British Council, UNDP, CII and Pricewaterhouse Coopers: 2002, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Survey’, A Survey by British Council, UNDP, CII and Pricewaterhouse Coopers, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Bromiley, P. and A. Marcus: 1989, ‘The Deterrent to Dubious Corporate Behavior: Profitability, Probability, and Safety Recalls’, Strategic Management Journal 10 (3), 233 - 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown, T. J. and P. A. Dacin: 1997, ‘The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses’, Journal of Marketing 61 (1), 68 – 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brugmann, J. and C. K. Prahalad: 2007, ‘Co-creating Business’s New Social Compact’, Harvard Business Review 85 (2), 80 - 90.Google Scholar
  28. Burke, L. and J. M. Logsdon: 1996, ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off’, Long Range Planning 29 (4), 495 - 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Business Week: Oct 2002, ‘Best and Worst Boards Survey: How Corporate Scandals are Sparking a Revolution in Governance’, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_40/b3802001.htm. Accessed 16 May 2006
  30. Chapple, W. and J. Moon: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting’, Business & Society 44 (4), 415 - 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen, K. H. and R. W. Metcalf: 1980, ‘The Relationship between Pollution Control Records and Financial Indicators Revisited, The Accounting Review 55 (1), 168 - 177.Google Scholar
  32. Christman, P.: 2000, ‘Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets’, Academy of Management Journal 43 (4), 663 - 680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Clair, J. A., J. Milliman and I. I. Mitroff: 1995, ‘Clash or Cooperation? Understanding Environmental Organizations and Their Relationships to Business’, in J. E. Post (ed.) and D. Collins and M. Starik (Vol. eds.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy: Sustaining the Natural EnvironmentEmpirical Studies on the Interface Between Nature and Organizations (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), Supplement 1, pp. 163–193Google Scholar
  34. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, ‘A Shareholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 20 (1), 571 - 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. CLSA (Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia): October 2000, ‘Report on Corporate Governance: Emerging Markets Equities Research’, http://web.management.mcgill.ca/Art.Durnev/clsa_2000.pdf. Accessed 5 January 2009
  36. Cochran, P. and R. Wood: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and the Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 27 (1), 42 - 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Coles, J. W., V. B. McWilliams and N. Sen: 2001, ‘An Examination of the Relationship of Governance Mechanisms to Performance’, Journal of Management 27 (1), 23 - 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Coombes, P. and M. Watson: 2000, ‘Three Surveys on Corporate Governance’, McKinsey Quarterly 4, 74 - 77.Google Scholar
  39. Copeland, T., T. Koller and J. Murrin: 2000, Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  40. CREM (Consultancy and Research for Environmental Management): 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility in India, Policy and Practices of Dutch Companies (CREM, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  41. CSM (Centre for Social Markets): 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Perceptions of Indian Business’, A Report by CSM, Calcutta, India, www.csmworld.org/public/pdf/social_respons.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2005
  42. Dahya, J. and J. J. McConnell: 2007, ‘Board Composition, Corporate Performance, and the Cadbury Committee Recommendation’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 42 (3), 535 - 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand and J. L. Johnson: 1998, ‘Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis’, Academy of Management Journal 42 (6), 674 - 686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Davidson, W. N., P. R. Chandy and M. Cross: 1987, ‘Large Losses, Risk Management and Stock Returns in the Airline Industry’, Journal of Risk and Insurance 55 (1), 162 - 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Davidson, W. N. and D. L. Worell: 1988, ‘The Impact of Announcements of Corporate Illegalities on Shareholder Returns’, Academy of Management Journal 31 (1), 195 - 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dunn, D. and K. Yamashita: 2003, ‘A Changed World, Microcapitalism and the Mega-corporation’, Harvard Business Review 81 (8), 46 - 54.Google Scholar
  47. Dutton, J. E., J. M. Dukerich and C. V. Harquail: 1994, ‘Organizational Images and Member Identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (2), 239 - 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Environics International (2001), eFlash Report: CSR Index (Environics International, Toronto).Google Scholar
  49. Epstein, M. J. and M. J. Roy: 2001, ‘Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers’, Long Range Planning 34 (5), 585 - 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Financial Express: December 19 2006, ‘New Norms to Gauge Toxins in Colas Soon’, p. 1Google Scholar
  51. Fomburn, C. and M. Shanley: 1990, ‘What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’, Academy of Management Journal 33 (2), 233 - 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Fowler, K. L. and D. R. Schmidt: 1988, ‘Tender Offers, Acquisitions, and Subsequent Performance in Manufacturing Firms’, Academy of Management Journal 31 (4), 962 - 974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Freedman, N. and B. Jaggi: 1982, ‘Pollution Disclosures, Pollution Performance, and Economic Performance’, Omega 10 (2), 167 - 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishing: Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  55. Frooman, J.: 1997, ‘Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth: A Meta-Analysis of Event Studies’, Business & Society 36 (3), 221 - 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Galbreath, J.: 2006, ‘Does Primary Stakeholder Management Positively Affect the Bottom Line? Some Evidence from Australia’, Management Decision 44 (8), 1106 - 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ganesh, G.: February 15 2001, ‘PSUs vs. Private Companies: The Reality Check’, Business Line, Internet edition, http://www.hinduonnet.com/businessline/2001/02/15/stories/041546mn.htm. Accessed 23 December 2008
  58. Gildea, R. L.: 1994, ‘Consumer Survey Confirms Corporate Social Action Affects Buying Decisions’, Public Relations Quarterly 39 (4), 20 - 22.Google Scholar
  59. Gillentine, A.: February 17 2006, ‘Timberland to Provide “Nutritional Label” for All Shoes’, The Colorado Springs Business Journal, http://www.allbusiness.com/north-america/united-states-colorado/1034748-1.html. Accessed 15 November 2007
  60. GMI Poll: 2005, More than a Third of all Consumers Boycott at Least One Brand (GMI, USA), http://www.gmi-mr.com.
  61. Goodpaster, K.: 1998, ‘Business Ethics’, In G. L. Cooper and C. Argyris (eds.), The Concise Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 56 - 60.Google Scholar
  62. Govindarajan, V.: 1984, ‘Appropriateness of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation: An Examination of Environmental Uncertainty as an Intervening Variable’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 (2), 125 - 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Govindarajan, V. and A. K. Gupta: 1985, ‘Linking Control Systems to Business Unit Strategy: Impact on Performance’, Accounting, Organizations, and Society 10 (1), 51 - 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Graafland, J. and B.W. van de Ven: 2006, ‘Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 22 (Summer), 111 - 123.Google Scholar
  65. Graves, S. and S. Waddock: 1994, `Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 37 (4), 1034 -1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Greening, D. W. and D. B. Turban: 2000, Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society 39 (3): 254 - 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Greeno, J. L. and S. N. Robinson: 1992, ‘Rethinking Corporate Environmental Management’, Columbia Journal of World Business 27 (3 and 4), 222 - 232.Google Scholar
  68. GRI (Global Reporting Initiatives): 2002, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI, Amsterdam), http://www.globalreporting.org.
  69. Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate’, Business & Society 36 (1), 5 - 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gupta, A.: 2005, A Report on Effectiveness of the Breaseeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI) Activities on Infant Feeding Policies and Practices in India, http://www.bpni.org/cgi/effect.asp. Accessed 16 April 2005
  71. Handelman, J. M. and S. J. Arnold: 1999, ‘The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment’, Journal of Marketing 63 (3), 33-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Handique, M.: 2008, ‘Companies Focus More on Social Responsibility Projects in Villages’, livemint.com: The Wall Street Journal, http://www.livemint.com/2008/03/11000146/Companies-focus-more-on-social.html. Accessed on 04 February 2009
  73. Hayes, A. S. and J. Pereira: September 20 1990, ‘Facing a Boycott, Many Companies Bend’, Wall Street Journal, pp. 1, 24Google Scholar
  74. Heal, G.: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice 30 (3), 387 - 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Herbert, B.: 1996, ‘Nike’s Pyramid Scheme’, New York Times, June 10, A.17–A.23Google Scholar
  76. Hoeffler, S. and K. L. Keller: 2002, ‘Building Brand Equity through Corporate Societal Marketing’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 21(1), 78 - 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hoque, Z.: 2004, ‘A Contingency Model of the Association between Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance Measurement: Impact on Firm Performance’, International Business Review 13 (4), 485 - 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Huselid, M.: 1995, ‘The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 38 (3), 635 - 672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Husted, B. W.: 2003, ‘Governance Choices for Corporate Social Responsibility: To Contribute, Collaborate or Internalize?’, Long Range Planning 36 (5), 481 - 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. IndiaPRwire.com: 2007, ‘Announcing Karmayog CSR Ratings of India’s Top 500 Companies’, http://www.indiaprwire.com/pressrelease/other/200712156225.htm. Accessed 10 December 2008
  81. Informatics (India) Limited: 2003, India Business Insight Database (Informatics (India) Limited, India), http://ibid.informindia.co.in/bsearch.asp.
  82. Ittner, C. D. and D. F. Larcker: 1998, ‘Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications’, Journal of Management Accounting Research 10 (1), 205 - 238.Google Scholar
  83. Ittner, C. D. and D. F. Larcker: 2000, ‘Non-Financial Performance Measures: What Works and What Does Not’, Knowledge@Wharton at http://knowledgewharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=279. Accessed 10 December 2008
  84. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton: 2001, ‘Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part 1’, Accounting Horizon 15 (1), 87 - 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Khan, A. F. and A. Atkinson: 1987, ‘Managerial Attitudes to Social Responsibility: A Comparative Study in India and Britain’, Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6), 419 - 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kinder, P., S. Lydenberg and B. Cohen: 2005, ‘Socrates: The Corporate Social Ratings Monitor’, http://www.kld.com/research/socrates/indicators.html. Accessed 12 April 2005
  87. Kirmani, A.: 1997, ‘Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It’s Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong’, Journal of Advertising 26 (3), 77 - 90.Google Scholar
  88. Klassen, R. D. and C. P. Mc Laughlin: 1996, ‘The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance’, Management Science 42 (8), 1199 - 1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Koys, D. J.: 2001, ‘The Effects of Employee Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Turnover on Organizational Effectiveness: A Unit-Level, Longitudinal Study’, Personnel Psychology 54 (1), 101 - 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. KPMG: 2005, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005 (KPMG Global Sustainability Services: Amsterdam), http://www.kpmg.org.
  91. Krishna, C. G.: 1992, Corporate Social Responsibility in India (Mittal Publications, New Delhi).Google Scholar
  92. Kumar, R., D. F. Murphy and V. Balsari: 2001, ‘Altered Images: The 2001 State of Corporate Responsibility in India Poll. Understanding and Encouraging Corporate Responsibility in South Asia – Update 1’, Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  93. Landon, S. and C. E. Smith: 1997, ‘The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumers: The Case of Bordeaux Wine’, Journal of Consumer Policy 20 (3), 285 - 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lee, M. P.: 2008, ‘A Review of the Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Evolutionary Path and the Road Ahead’, International Journal of Management Reviews 10 (1), 53 - 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Leff, E.: 2004, Community Development Vehicles Adopted by Corporates: An Exploration (Asia Pacific Philanthropy Consortium, Centre for Advancement of Philanthropy and Partner-in-Change, New Delhi).Google Scholar
  96. Lev, B.: 2000, ‘Knowledge Management: Fad or Need?’, Research Technology Management 43 (5), 9 - 10.Google Scholar
  97. Luo, X. and C. B. Bhattacharya: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction and Market Value’, Journal of Marketing 70 (4), 1 - 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mahajan, A.: 2004, ‘Enhancing Business Community Relations: The Role of Volunteers in Promoting Global Corporate Citizenship’, National Research Report, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  99. Maignan, I., and O. C. Ferrell: 2001, ‘Corporate Citizenship as a Marketing Instrument – Concepts, Evidence and Research Directions’, European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4), 457 - 484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Margolis, J. D. and J. P. Walsh: 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2), 268 - 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 31 (4), 854 - 872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. McVea, J. F. and R. E. Freeman: 2005, ‘A Names-and-faces Approach to Stakeholder Management’, Journal of Management Enquiry 14 (1), 57 - 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Miles, M. P. and J. G. Covin: 2000, ‘Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage’, Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3), 299 - 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Moore, G.: 2001, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry’, Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3/4), 299 - 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Moskowitz, M.: 1972, ‘Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks’, Business and Society 1 (Spring), 71 - 75.Google Scholar
  106. Nemkumar, H.: 2000, ‘India: A Research Head’s Perspective’, Report on Corporate Governance: Emerging Markets Equities Research, http://web.management.mcgill.ca/Art.Durnev/clsa_2000.pdf. Accessed 5 January 2009, pp. 60–61
  107. Ong, L. K.: 2003, ‘Does Adding Non-financial Value Drivers to a Summary Financial Measure Improve the Learning and Performance of Managers?’, University of South California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  108. Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt and S. L. Rynes: 2003, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Aanalysis’, Organization Studies 24 (3), 403 - 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Owen C. L. and R. F. Scherer: 1993, ‘Social Responsibility and Market Share’, Review of Business 15 (1), 11 - 17.Google Scholar
  110. Pava, M. L. and J. Krausz: 1996, ‘The Association between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance – The Paradox of Social Cost’, Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3), 321 - 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. PiC (Partners in Change): 2004, Third Report on Corporate Involvement in Social Development in India (PiC, New Delhi).Google Scholar
  112. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie and N. P. Podsakoff: 2003, ‘Common Method Biases in Behavioural Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), 879 - 903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Prahalad C. K. and G. Hamel: 1990, ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’, Harvard Business Review 68 (3), 79 - 91.Google Scholar
  114. Prowess: 2005, Prowess Version 2.5 (CMIE, New Delhi), www.cmie.com.
  115. Riordan, C. M., R. D. Gatewood and J. B. Bill: 1997, ‘Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4), 401 - 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Robins, J. and M. Wiersema: 1995, `A Resource-Based Approach to the Multi-business Firm: Empirical Analysis of Portfolio Interrelationships and Corporate Financial’, Strategic Management Journal 16 (4), 277 - 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rockefeller, R. C.: 2003, ‘Turn Public Problems into Private Account’, Harvard Business Review 81 (8), 129 - 137.Google Scholar
  118. Rosewicz, B.: April 20 1990, ‘Americans are Willing to Sacrifice to Reduce Pollution, They Say’, The Wall Street Journal (New York), p. AlGoogle Scholar
  119. Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar, R. M. Brown, J. J. Janney and K. Paul: 2001, ‘An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 32 (2), 143 - 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Russo, M. V. and P. A. Fouts: 1997, ‘A Resource Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 40 (3), 534 - 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sagar, P. and A. Singla: 2004, ‘Trust and Corporate Social Responsibility: Lessons from India’, Journal of Communication Management 8 (3), 282 - 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. SAI (Social Accountability International): 2001, Social Accountability 8000 (SAI: New York).Google Scholar
  123. Schmidheiny, S.: 1992, Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  124. Schwaiger, M.: 2004, ‘Components and Parameters of Corporate Reputation - An Empirical Study’, Schmalenbach Business Review 56 (1), 46 - 71.Google Scholar
  125. Sen, S. and C. B. Bhattacharya: 2001, ‘Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2), 225 - 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sen, S., C.B. Bhattacharya and D. Korschun: 2006, ‘The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (2), 158 - 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Shane, P. and B. Spicer: 1983, ‘Market Response to Environmental Information Produced Outside the Firm’, Accounting Review 58 (July), 521 - 538.Google Scholar
  128. Singh, R. and K. Bhagat: 2004, ‘Corporate Initiatives in Indian Agriculture’, Indian Management 43 (2), 72 - 79.Google Scholar
  129. Somavia J.: 2000, ‘Business. Its Direct Stake in Putting Human Needs First’, UN Chronicle 37 (2), 42.Google Scholar
  130. Sood, A. and B. Arora: 2006, ‘The Political Economy of Corporate Responsibility in India’, Technology, Business and Society (18), United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) Program Paper, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  131. Springer, J.: 2006, ‘Whole Foods Posts 22% Sales Growth’, Supermarket News 54 (7), 8.Google Scholar
  132. Teoh, H. Y. and G. Y. Shiu: 1990, ‘Attitudes towards Corporate Social Responsibility and Perceived Importance of Social Responsibility Information Characteristics in a Decision Context’, Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1), 71 - 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Teoh, S. H., I. Welch and C. P. Wazzan: 1999, ‘The Effect of Socially Activist Investment Policies on the Financial Markets: Evidence from the South African Boycott’, Journal of Business 72 (1), 35 - 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tsang, E. W. K. and K. Kwan: 1999, ‘Replication and Theory Development in Organizational Science: A Critical Realist Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 24 (4), 759 -780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Turban, D. B. and D.W. Greening: 1997, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’, Academy of Management Journal 40 (3), 658 -763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Ullman, A. A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’, Academy of Management Review 10 (3), 540 - 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Venkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam: 1987, ‘Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence’, Journal of Management 13 (1), 109 -122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Verschoor, C. C.: 1998, ‘A Study of the Link between a Corporation’s Financial Performance and its Commitment to Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13), 1509 - 1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Vogel, D.: 2005, The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. (Brookings Institution Press: Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  140. Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18 (4), 303 - 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16 (4), 691-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wright, P. and S. Ferris: 1997, ‘Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value’, Strategic Management Journal 18 (1), 77 - 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Wu, M. L.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance, and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of American Academy of Business 8 (1), 163 - 171.Google Scholar
  144. Youndt, M., S. Snell, J. Dean and D. Lepak: 1996, ‘Human Resource Management Manufacturing Strategy and Firm Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 39 (4), 836 - 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zahra, S. A. and Latour, M. S.:1987, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Effectiveness: A Multivariate Approach’, Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6), 459 – 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations