Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 90, Supplement 3, pp 419–428 | Cite as

Enabling the Original Intent: Catalysts for Social Entrepreneurship

  • Craig V. VanSandt
  • Mukesh Sud
  • Christopher Marmé
Article

Abstract

As capitalist economies have shifted their primary focus from providing goods and services for all, to concentrating wealth at the top echelons of societies, social entrepreneurs have been one source of re-capturing the original intent of capitalism. Social entrepreneurs have combined the efficiency and effectiveness of business organizations with the social concerns of many non-profit and governmental agencies. As a result, social entrepreneurship is viewed as having significant potential for alleviating many of the social ills we now face. To accomplish this mission, however, will require expansion of social enterprises beyond their current footprints. We explore alternate methods of expansion, scaling and replication, and then examine potential catalysts, which can enable social entrepreneurs to attain their goals of social improvement. The catalysts we identify are effectual logic, enhanced legitimacy through appropriate reporting metrics, and information technology. We conclude with two brief case studies that exemplify how these catalysts are currently working to enhance the effectiveness of social start-ups.

Key words

effectual logic replication scaling social entrepreneurship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, J., H.Stevenson, and J. Wei-Skillern: 2006, ‘Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, Or Both?’, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 30(1), 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babajob: 2008, http://www.babajob.com/. Accessed 31 Jan 2010.
  3. Berle, A.A. and G.C. Means: 1933, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, (Macmillan Co,New York).Google Scholar
  4. Bradach, J.L.: 2003, ‘The Challenge of Replicating Social Programs’, Stanford Social Innovation Review 1(1), 18-25.Google Scholar
  5. Carson, R.: 1962, Silent Spring, (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  6. Cho, A.: 2006, “Politics Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Appraisal”, in J. Mair, J. Robinson and K. Hockerts (eds.), Social Entrepreneurship, (Palmgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, UK) pp. 34-56.Google Scholar
  7. Christenson, J.A. and L. Sigelman: 1985, ‘Accrediting Knowledge: Journal Stature and Citation Impact in Social Sciences’, Social Sciences Quarterly Index 66, 964-976.Google Scholar
  8. Daly, H.E. and J.B. Cobb: 1989, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future, (Boston Beacon Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  9. Dart, R.: 2004, ‘The Legitimacy of the Social Enterprise’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14(4), 411-424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dees, J.: 1998, ‘Enterprising Nonprofits', Harvard Business Review, January–February, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
  11. Dees, J.G., B.B. Anderson, and J.Wei-Skillern: 2004, ‘Scaling Social Impact: Strategies for Spreading Social Innovations’, Stanford Social Innovation Review 4(1), 25-32.Google Scholar
  12. Diamond, A.M.: 1986, ‘What is a Citation Worth?’, Journal of Human Resources 21, 200-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiMaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell: 1983, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review 48(2), 147-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emerson, J., J. Wachowicz and S. Chun: 1999, ‘Social Return on Investment: Exploring Aspects of Value Creation in the Nonprofit Sector’, http://www.redf.org/learn-from-redf/publications/118. Accessed 31 Jan 2010.
  15. Friedman, T.L.: 2005, The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  16. Gadgil, M. and R. Guha : 1993, This Fissured Land: An Ecological Survey of India, (University of California Press, Berkley, CA,).Google Scholar
  17. Galbraith, J.K.: 1996, The Good Society: The Human Agenda, (Houghton Mifflin Co, Boston).Google Scholar
  18. Gates, B.: 2008, ‘Making Capitalism More Creative’, Time, August 11.Google Scholar
  19. Giridharadas, A.: 2007, ‘In India, Poverty Inspires Technology Workers to Altruism’, The New York Times, October 30, pp. C4–C5.Google Scholar
  20. Gore, A.: 2006, An Inconvenient Truth, (Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA).Google Scholar
  21. Grossman, R.L. and F.T. Adams : 1993, Taking Care of Business : Citizenship and the Charter of Incorporation, (Charter, Ink. Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  22. Heslam, P.S.: 2007, “Reducing Poverty through Successful Business : The Role of Social Capital”, in J.F.A. Stoner and C. Wankel (eds.), Innovative Approaches to Reducing Global Poverty, (Information Age Publishing Inc., Charlotte, NC), pp. 131-152.Google Scholar
  23. Hinkley, R.: 2002, ‘How Corporate Law Inhibits Ethics', Business Ethics 16(1), 4–5.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton: 1996, The Balanced Scorecard : Translating Strategy into Action, (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
  25. Kelley, M.: 2003, The Divine Right of Capital: Dethroning the Corporate Aristocracy, (Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.,San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
  26. Koehn, N.: 2008, ‘The Time is Right for Creative Capitalism’, Working Knowledge Harvard Business School, http://hbswk.hbs.edu/cgi-bin/print?id=5988.
  27. Korten, D.C.: 1995, When Corporations Rule the World, (Berrett-Koehler Publishers,San Francisco,CA).Google Scholar
  28. Krishna, A.: 2004, ‘Escaping Poverty and Becoming Poor: Who Gains, Who Looses and Why?’ World Development 32(1), 121-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurth, J.: 2006, ‘The Rich Get Richer’, The American Conservative, September 25.Google Scholar
  30. Leung, K.: 2007, ‘The Glory and Tyranny of Citation Impact: An East Asian Perspective’, Academy of Management Journal 50(3), 510-513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mair, J. and I. Marti, I: 2006, ‘Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction and Delight’, Journal of World Business 41, 36-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mair, J., J.Robinson and K.Hockerts: 2006, “Introduction”, in J. Mair, J. Robinson and K. Hockerts (eds.), Social Entrepreneurship, (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke), pp. 1-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murdoch, J.: 1999, ‘The Microfinance Promise’, Journal of Economic Literature 37(4), 1569-1614.Google Scholar
  34. Nace, T.: 2003, Gangs of America : The Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy, (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA).Google Scholar
  35. Nicholls, A.: 2006, “Introduction”, in A. Nicholls (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Change (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  36. Nicholls, A. and Cho, A.: 2006, ‘Social Entrepreneurship: The Structuration of a Field’, in A. Nicholls (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  37. O’Brien, M. J.: 2008, ‘The Only Nonprofit that Matters’, Fortune, March, pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
  38. Okun, A.M.: 1975, Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff, (Brookings Institution, Washington).Google Scholar
  39. Olson, L.: 1994, ‘Growing Pains’, Education Week, November 2, p. 29.Google Scholar
  40. Polak, P.: 2008, Out of Poverty, (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco).Google Scholar
  41. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  42. Sarasvathy, S.M.: 2001, ‘Causation and Effectuation: Towards a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency’, Academy of Management Review 26(2), 243-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarasvathy, S.M.: 2008, Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise, (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA).Google Scholar
  44. Seglen, P.O.: 1997, ‘Why the Impact Factor should not be used for Evaluating Research’, British Medical Journal 314, 498-502.Google Scholar
  45. Senge, P.: 1999, The Fifth Discipline, (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  46. Suchman, M.: 1995, ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches ‘, Academy of Management Review 20(3), 571-610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sud, M., C. V. VanSandt and A. M. Baugous: 2009, ‘Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Institutions’, Journal of Business Ethics 85(1), 201–216.Google Scholar
  48. Tawney, R.H.: 1962, Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: A Historical Study, (P. Smith, Gloucester, MA).Google Scholar
  49. Thurow, L.C.: 1975, Generating Inequality: Mechanisms of Distribution in the U.S. Economy, (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Turner, W.W. and F. Rojouan : 1991, ‘Evaluating Input/Output Relationships in a Regional Research Network using Co-Word Analysis’, Scientometrics 22, 139-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wankel, C.: 2008, “Introduction: A Variety of Approaches to Alleviating Poverty through Business Strategy”, in C. Wankel (ed.), Alleviating Poverty through Business Strategy, (Palgrave Macmillan, New York), pp. 1-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber, M.: 1958, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
  53. Wei-Skillern, J., J.E.Austin, H., Leonard and H. Stevenson: 2007, Entrepreneurship in the Social Sector, (Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA).Google Scholar
  54. Werhane, P.H.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making, (New York, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  55. Williamson, O.E.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, (Free Press; New York).Google Scholar
  56. Wolman, W. and A. Colamosca: 1997, The Judas Economy: The Triumph of Capital and the Betrayal of Work, (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc. Reading, MA).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig V. VanSandt
    • 1
  • Mukesh Sud
    • 2
  • Christopher Marmé
    • 1
  1. 1.Augustana CollegeRock IslandU.S.A.
  2. 2.Fairfield UniversityFairfieldU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations