Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 89, Supplement 3, pp 247–267 | Cite as

Accounting for the Benefits of Social Security and the Role of Business: Four Ideal Types and Their Different Heuristics

  • Rüdiger W. WaldkirchEmail author
  • Matthias Meyer
  • Karl Homann


Germany is considered to be a pioneer of social security systems; nonetheless, globalization and demographic changes have put enormous pressure on them. A solution is not yet in sight as the debate on the future of the German social security systems still lacks consensus. We argue that ideas matter and that the debate can benefit from a deeper reflection on the concept of social security. This objective is pursued along two lines. First, we take a historical perspective and reconstruct the development of Germany’s social security systems. Second, we scrutinize from a theoretical perspective how social security is conceptualized in public and theoretical debates. Behind the various positions, we identify four basic ideal types. We then analyze how these ideal types account for the benefits of social security systems and what role they assign to corporations in providing social security. While two ultimately reinforce potential conflicts between different groups in society, the other two ideal types reveal possible benefits for all. The last ideal type actually conceptualizes social security systems as insurance that fosters risky but overall productive investments in human and other forms of capital. Therefore, it can be shown that social security systems are not necessarily threatened by globalization and that incentives exist for corporations to invest in the provision of social security.


Corporate Social Responsibility heuristics ideal types (social) contract theory social market economy social security systems 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arentz, H. J.: 2004, Sozialstaat im Härtetest (Droste, Düsseldorf).Google Scholar
  2. Ashford, N.: 1993, Dismantling the Welfare State: Why and How.
  3. Backhaus-Maul, H.: 2004, ‘Corporate Citizenship im deutschen Sozialstaat’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschehen 14, 23–30.Google Scholar
  4. Berthold, N.: 1997, Der Sozialstaat im Zeitalter der Globalisierung (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).Google Scholar
  5. Blair T, G. Schröder (2000) ‘Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte’. In: B. Hombach (eds) The Politics of the New Centre. (Polity Press, Cambridge), 157-177.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J.M.: 1975, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan J.M (1986) ‘Dismantling the Welfare State’. In: J.M. Buchanan (ed) Liberty, Market, and State: Political Economy in the 1980 s. (Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton), 178-185.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J. M.: 1992, ‘Markt, Staat und Freiheit: die politische Ökonomie des Wohlfahrtsstaates’, in Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung (ed.), Argumente der Freiheit: Markt, Freiheit und Demokratie. (COMDOK-Verl.-Abt., Sankt Augustin), pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock: 1996, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
  10. Bundesbank, D.: 2008, Währungsreform 1948. Accessed 30 Dec 2008.
  11. Carroll, A.B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society 38(3), 268-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Commission, E.: 2001, Green Paper, Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (COM (2001) 366, Brussels).Google Scholar
  13. Crane, A. and D. Matten: 2004, Business Ethics, a European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  14. Crane, A., D. Matten and L.J. Spence: 2007, Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context (Routledge, Milton Park).Google Scholar
  15. Erhard, L.: 1964, Wohlstand für Alle (ECON Verlag, Düsseldorf).Google Scholar
  16. Fabiunke, G.: 1963, Martin Luther als Nationalökonom (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin).Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  18. Galbraith J.K (1948) ‘The German Economy’. In S.E. Harris (ed) Foreign Economic Policy for the United States. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge), 91-103.Google Scholar
  19. Giersch, H., K.-H. Paqué and H. Schmieding: 1994, The Fading Miracle: Four Decades of Market Economy in Germany (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  20. Graf Fugger von Glött, U.: 2003, Die Fuggerei: die älteste Sozialsiedlung der Welt (Wißner-Verlag, Augsburg).Google Scholar
  21. Hauser R, B. Rudolph (1999) ‘Soziale Sicherungssysteme’. In: W. Korff (ed) Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik. Band 4. (Gütersloher Verlagshaus, Gütersloh), 455-471.Google Scholar
  22. Hayek F.A.v (1978) ‘The Primacy of the Abstract’. In F. A. v. Hayek (ed) New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. (Routledge, London), 35-49.Google Scholar
  23. Hayek, F.A.v.: 1979, The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason (Liberty Press, Indianapolis).Google Scholar
  24. Hayek F.A. v. (1991) ‘Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733)’. In: W. W. Bartley, S. Kresge (eds) The Trend of Economic Thinking: Essays on Political Economists and Economic History. (Routledge, London), 79-100.Google Scholar
  25. Hetzel, R. L.: 2002, German Monetary History in the First Half of the Twentieth Century.
  26. Homann K (2003) ‘Reformstau in der Sozialpolitik: ein Beitrag zur Strukturierung der Diskussion’. In: C. Luetge (eds) Anreize und Moral: Gesellschaftstheorie - Ethik – Anwendungen. (LIT-Verlag, Münster), 287-298.Google Scholar
  27. Howard-Grenville, J., J. Nash and C. Coglianese: 2008, ‘Constructing the License to Operate: Internal Factors and Their Influence on Corporate Environmental Decisions’, Law & Policy 30(1), 73-107.Google Scholar
  28. Kellenbenz, H.: 1971, ‘Die sozialgeschichtliche Bedeutung der Fuggerei’, Schwäbische Blätter für Heimatpflege und Volksbildung 22, 105-117.Google Scholar
  29. Kießling R (1990) ‘Vom Pfenningalmosen zur Aussteuerstiftung: Materielle Kultur in den Seelgeräten des Augsburger Bürgertums während des Mittelalters’. In H. Kühnel (ed) Materielle Kultur und religiöse Stiftung im Spätmittelalter. (Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien), 37-62.Google Scholar
  30. Kotlikoff L.J (1987) ‘Social Security’. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. (Macmillan, London), 413-418.Google Scholar
  31. Krugman, P.R.: 2007, The Conscience of a Liberal: Reclaiming America from the Right (Penguin Books, London).Google Scholar
  32. Lampert H (1990) ‘Notwendigkeit, Aufgaben und Grundzüge einer Theorie der Sozialpolitik’. In: T. Thiemeyer (ed) Theoretische Grundlagen der Sozialpolitik. (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin), 9-71.Google Scholar
  33. Lampert, H. and J. Althammer: 2007, Lehrbuch der Sozialpolitik (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
  34. Luetge, C.: 2006, ‘An Economic Rationale for a Work and Savings Ethic? J. Buchanan’s Late Works and Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 43-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mandeville, B.: 1934, The Fable of the Bees; or, Private Vices, Public Benefits (Wishart & Company, London).Google Scholar
  36. Meerhaeghe, M.v.: 2006, ‘Bismarck and the Social Question’, Journal of Economic Studies 33, 284-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merkel, A.: 2000, ‘Die Wir-Gesellschaft: Über die Notwendigkeit einer Neuen Sozialen Marktwirtschaft’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 269, 11.Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, M.: 2004, Prinzipale, Agenten und ökonomische Methode: von einseitiger Steuerung zu wechselseitiger Abstimmung (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).Google Scholar
  39. Müller-Armack, A.: 1946, ‘Wirtschaftslenkung und Marktwirtschaft’, in A. Müller-Armack (ed.), Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftspolitik: Studien und Konzepte zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft und zur Europäischen Integration (Haupt, Bern), pp. 19–170.Google Scholar
  40. Müller-Armack, A.: 1976, Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftspolitik: Studien und Konzepte zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft und zur Europäischen Integration (Haupt, Bern).Google Scholar
  41. Müller-Armack A (1989) ‘The Meaning of the Social Market Economy’. In A.T. Peacock, H. Willgerodt (eds) Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution. (Macmillan for the Trade Policy Research Centre, London), 82-86.Google Scholar
  42. Nef, R.: 2006, The Welfare State Destroys Welfare and the State.
  43. Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  44. Obama, B.: 2006, The Audacity of Hope (Three Rivers Press, New York).Google Scholar
  45. Okun, A.M.: 1975, Equality and Efficiency, the Big Tradeoff (The Brookings Institution, Washington).Google Scholar
  46. Petrick, M. and I. Pies: 2007, ‘In Search for Rules that Secure Gains from Cooperation: The Heuristic Value of Social Dilemmas for Normative Institutional Economics’, European Journal of Law and Economics 23(3), 251-271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pigou, A.C.: 1932, The Economics of Welfare (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
  48. Pölnitz, G.: 1970, Die Fugger (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).Google Scholar
  49. Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Ritter, G.A.: 1991, Der Sozialstaat: Entstehung und Entwicklung im internationalen Vergleich (Oldenbourg, München).Google Scholar
  51. Ritter, G.A.: 1998, Bismarck und die Entstehung der deutschen Sozialversicherung (Stadt Pforzheim, Pforzheim).Google Scholar
  52. Rosen, S., J. Simon, J.R. Vincent, W. MacLead, M. Fox and D.M. Thea: 2003, ‘AIDS Is Your Business’, Harvard Business Review 81(2), 81-87.Google Scholar
  53. Rothbard, M.N.: 1970, Power & Market; Government and the Economy (Institute for Humane Studies, Menlo Park).Google Scholar
  54. Rothbard, M.N.: 1982, The Ethics of Liberty (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands).Google Scholar
  55. Rothbard, M. N.: 2002, For a New Liberty: the Libertarian Manifesto (Ludwig von Mises Institute).
  56. Scheller, B.: 2004, Memoria an der Zeitenwende: die Stiftungen Jakob Fuggers des Reichen vor und während der Reformation (ca. 1505 - 1555) (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin).Google Scholar
  57. Schlecht O. (1999) ‘Soziale Marktwirtschaft’. In W. Korff (ed) Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik: Band 1 – 4. (Gütersloher Verl.-Haus, Gütersloh), 289-303.Google Scholar
  58. Schmidt, M.G.: 2005, Sozialpolitik in Deutschland: historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
  59. Sigerist, H.Y.: 1999, ‘From Bismarck to Beveridge: Developments and Trends in Social Security Legislation’, Journal of Public Health Policy 20(4), 474-496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sinn, H.-W.: 1995, ‘A Theory of the Welfare State’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97(4), 495-526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sinn H.-W. (1996) ‘Social Insurance, Incentives and Risk Taking’. International Tax and Public Finance 3:259-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sinn, H.-W.: 2000, ‘The Threat to the German Welfare State’, Atlantic Economic Journal 28(3), 279-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sinn, H.-W.: 2003, The New Systems Competition (Blackwell, Malden, MA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sinn, H.-W.: 2007, Can Germany be Saved? The Malaise of the World’s First Welfare State (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.).Google Scholar
  65. Steinmann, H. and A. G. Scherer: 2000, Corporate Ethics and Management Theory. In P. Koslowski (ed.), Contemporary Economic Ethics and Business Ethics: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, pp. 148–192.Google Scholar
  66. Strieder, J.: 1931, Jacob Fugger the Rich, Merchant and Banker of Augsburg, 1459-1525 (The Adelphi Company, New York).Google Scholar
  67. Suchanek, A.: 1994, Ökonomischer Ansatz und theoretische Integration (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).Google Scholar
  68. Tietz-Strödel, M.: 1982, Die Fuggerei in Augsburg: Studien zur Entwicklung des sozialen Stiftungsbaus im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen).Google Scholar
  69. Weber, M.: 1949, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (The Free Press, Glencoe).Google Scholar
  70. Weidenbacher, J.: 1926, Die Fuggerei in Augsburg: die erste deutsche Kleinhaus-Stiftung (Selbstverlag, Augsburg).Google Scholar
  71. Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  72. Wünsche, H.F.: 1982, Standard Texts on the Social Market Economy: Two Centuries of Discussion (Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rüdiger W. Waldkirch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthias Meyer
    • 2
  • Karl Homann
    • 3
  1. 1.South Westphalia University of Applied SciencesMeschedeGermany
  2. 2.Kühne School of Logistics and ManagementHamburg University of TechnologyHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Ludwig-Maximilian-UniversityMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations