Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 95, Issue 2, pp 227–237 | Cite as

Business Ethics Journal Rankings as Perceived by Business Ethics Scholars

  • Chad AlbrechtEmail author
  • Jeffery A. Thompson
  • Jeffrey L. Hoopes
  • Pablo Rodrigo
Article

Abstract

We present the findings of a worldwide survey that was administered to business ethic scholars to better understand journal quality within the business ethics academic community. Based upon the data from the survey, we provide a ranking of the top 10 business ethics journals. We then provide a comparison of business ethics journals to other mainstream management journals in terms of journal quality. The results of the study suggest that, within the business ethics academic community, many scholars prefer to publish in the top business ethics academic journals over other mainstream management journals. Furthermore, the results of the study suggest that within the business ethics academic field there are two dominant academic communities: one in Europe and one in North America. Each of these academic communities has its own preferred publication outlets, suggesting a potentially problematic bifurcation of business ethics scholarship.

Keywords

academic community business ethics scholars CSR journal quality survey ranking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astley, G.: 1985, ‘Administrative science as socially constructed truth’, Administrative Science Quarterl, 30, 497 – 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axarloglou, K. and V. Theoharakis: 2003, ‘Diversity in economics: An analysis of journal quality perceptions’, Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 1402 – 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beed, C. and C. Beed: 1996, ‘Measuring the quality of academic journals: The case of economics’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 18, 369 – 96.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, L.D. and R.J. Huefner: 1994, ‘The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading U.S. MBA programmes’, Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 223 – 50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caligiuri, P. M.: 1999, ‘The ranking of scholarly journals in international human resource management’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 10, 515 – 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan, C. K., R.C.W. Fok and M-S. Pan: 2000, ‘Citation-based finance journal rankings: An update’, Financial Practice & Education 10, 132 – 31.Google Scholar
  7. Chua, C., L. Cao, K. Cousins and D.W. Straub: 2003, ‘Measuring researcher-production in information systems’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 3, 21 – 26.Google Scholar
  8. Coe, R. K. and I. Weinstock: 1984, ‘Evaluating the management journals: A second look’, Academy of Management Journal 27, 660 – 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De George, R. T.: 1987, ‘The status of business ethics: Past and future’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 201 -11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De George, R. T.: 1989, ‘There is ethics in business ethics, but there’s more as well’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 337 – 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 1994, ‘Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory’, Academy of Management Review 19, 252 – 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DuBois, F. L. and D. Reeb: 2000, ‘Ranking the international business journals’, Journal of International Business Studies 31: 689 - 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enderle, G.: 1996a, ‘Towards business ethics as an academic discipline’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6, 43 – 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enderle, G: 1996b, ‘A comparison of business ethics in North America and continental Europe’, Business Ethics: A European Review 5, 34 – 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Extejt, M. M. and J.E. Smith: 1990, ‘The behavioral sciences and management: An evaluation of relevant journals’, Journal of Management 16, 539 – 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandez-Izquierdo, A. and J.C. Matallin-Saez: 2008, ‘Performance of ethical mutual funds in Spain: Sacrifice or premium?’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, 247 – 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. E.: 2000, ‘Business ethics at the millennium’, Business Ethics Quarterly 10, 169 – 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garriga, E. and D. Melé: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory’, Journal of Business Ethics 53, 51-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gephart, R. P.: 2004, ‘Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal’, Academy of Management Journal 47, 454 – 62.Google Scholar
  20. Gomez-Mejia, L. and D. Balkin: 1992, ‘Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective’, Academy of Management Journal 35, 921 – 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham, J. R., C.R. Harvey and S. Rajgopal: 2005, ‘The economic implications of corporate financial reporting’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 40, 3 – 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoopes, J., J. Thompson, C. Albrecht and W. S. Albrecht: 2009, ‘Productivity and Prestige in Business Ethics Research’, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  23. Hyland, K.: 2003, ‘Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54, 251 – 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, J. L. and P.M. Podsakoff: 1994, ‘Journal influence in the field of management: An analysis using Salancik’s index in a dependency Network’, Academy of Management Journal 37, 1392 – 1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahn, W. A.: 1990, ‘Toward an agenda for business ethics research’, Academy of Management Review 15, 311 – 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis, P. V.: 1985, ‘Defining ‘business ethics’: Like nailing jello to a wall’, Journal of Business Ethics 4, 377 – 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lowe, A. and J. Locke: 2005, ‘Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: Results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 81 – 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowry, P., D.B. Romans and A. Curtis: 2004, ‘Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5, 29 – 77.Google Scholar
  29. Macmillan, I.: 1989, ‘Delineating a forum for business policy scholars’, Strategic Management Journal 10, 391 – 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason, P. M. and J.W. Steagall: 1997, ‘Economics journal rankings by type of school: perceptions versus citations’, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 36, 69 – 80.Google Scholar
  31. Paul, K.: 2004, ‘Business and society and business ethics journals: A citation and impact analysis’, Journal of Scholarly Publishing 35, 103 – 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Philosophy Documentation Center: 2009, http://www.pdcnet.org/index.html.
  33. Sabrin, M.: 2002, ‘A Ranking of the most productive business ethics scholars: A five-year study’, Journal of Business Ethics 36, 355 – 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seglen, P. O.: 1997, ‘Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research’, British Medical Journal 314, 498 – 502.Google Scholar
  35. Sims, R. R. and E.L. Felton Jr.: 2006, ‘Designing and delivering business ethics teaching and learning’, Journal of Business Ethics 63, 297 – 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Theoharakis, V. and A. Hirst: 2002, ‘Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective, Marketing Letters 13, 389 – 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson Reuters: 2009, ‘The Thomson Scientific Impact Factor’, http://thomsonreuters.com/business_units/scientific/free/essays/impactfactor.
  38. Trevino, L. K. and G.R. Weaver: 1994, ‘Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 113 – 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trevino, L. K., G.R. Weaver and S.J. Reynolds: 2006, ‘Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review’, Journal of Management 32, 951 – 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Fleet, D. D., A. McWilliams and D.S. Siegel: 2000, ‘A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists’, Journal of Management 26, 839 – 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Victor, B. and C.U. Stephens: 1994, ‘Business ethics: A synthesis of normative philosophy and empirical social science’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 145 – 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Webster, D. S. and C. F. Conrad: 1986, ‘Using Faculty Research Performance for Academic Quality Rankings’, in Creswell JW (ed.), Measuring Faculty Research Performance. New Directions for Institutional Research (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), Vol. 50, pp. 43–57.Google Scholar
  43. Wicks, A. C. and R. Derry: 1996, ‘An evaluation of journal quality: The perspective of business ethics researchers’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3, 359 – 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wines, W. A. and N.K. Napier: 1992, ‘Toward an understanding of cross-cultural ethics: A tentative model’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 831 – 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zeff, S. A.: 1996, ‘A study of academic research journals in accounting’, Accounting Horizons 10, 158 – 77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chad Albrecht
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeffery A. Thompson
    • 2
  • Jeffrey L. Hoopes
    • 3
  • Pablo Rodrigo
    • 4
  1. 1.Huntsman School of BusinessUtah State UniversityLoganU.S.A.
  2. 2.Romney Institute of Public ManagementMarriott School of Management, Brigham Young UniversityProvoU.S.A.
  3. 3.Ross School of BusinessUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborU.S.A.
  4. 4.Escuela de NegociosUniversidad Adolfo IbáñezViña del MarChile

Personalised recommendations