Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 441–453 | Cite as

Why Do College Students Cheat?

Article

Abstract

More is known about the pervasiveness of college cheating than reasons why students cheat. This article reports the results of a study that applied the theory of reasoned action and partial least squares methodology to analyze the responses of 144 students to a survey on cheating behavior. Approximately 60% of the business students and 64% of the non-business students admitted to such behavior. Among cheaters, a “desire to get ahead” was the most important motivating factor – a surprising result given the comprehensive set of factors tested in the study. Among non-cheaters, the presence of a “moral anchor” such as an ethical professor was most important. The article also includes a set of important caveats that might limit this study and suggests some avenues for further study.

Keywords

cheating ethical behavior student dishonesty student misconduct theory of reasoned action 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the editors and four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions in revising earlier drafts of this manuscript.

References

  1. AACSB. (2009). Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation (pp. 1-78). Tampa, FL: The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business.Google Scholar
  2. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Baker, C. R. (2008). Moral Reasoning and Questionable Behavior. The CPA Journal, 78(11), 58-60.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, A., & Lavallee, D. (2008). Applying the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior to Athlete Training Adherence Behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Journal, 57(2), 304-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkhi, R. (2008). A Model of the Determinants of Purchasing from Virtual Stores. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(3), 117-196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisping, T. O., Patron, H., & Roskelly, K. (2008). Modeling Academic Dishonesty: The Role of Student Perceptions and Misconduct Type. Journal of Economic Education, 39(1), 4-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and its Control in College. Columbia, NY: Bureau of Applied Social Research.Google Scholar
  8. Carauna, A., & Ewing, M. T. (2000). The Effect of Anomie on Academic Dishonesty of University Students. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(1), 23-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman, K. J., Davis, R., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2004). Academic Integrity in the Business School Environment: I’ll get by with a Little Help from My Friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 236-249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chin, W. W. (1998a). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.Google Scholar
  11. Chin, W. W. (Ed.). (1998b). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modelling. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Conlin, M.: 2007, ‘Cheating - Or Postmodern Learning’, Business Week, Vol. 4034, p. 42Google Scholar
  15. Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 683-700.Google Scholar
  16. Damast, A.: 2008, ‘Fuqua Puts Scandal Behind It’, Business Week, p. 5Google Scholar
  17. Davis, S., & Ludvigson, H. (1995). Additional Data on Academic Dishonesty and Proposal for Remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 119-121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The ‘What’ and ‘How’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eastman, J. K., Eastman, K. L., & Drennan, R. B. (1996). The Ethics of Insurance Professionals: Comparison of Personal versus Professional Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 951-962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eastman, K. L., Eastman, J. K., & Iyer, R. (2008). Academic Dishonesty: An Exploratory Study Examining Whether Insurance Students Are Different from Other College Students. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 11(1), 209-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Etter, S., Cramer, J., & Finn, S. (2006). Origins of Academic Dishonesty: Ethical Orientations and Personality Factors Associated with Attitudes about Cheating with Information Technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 133-155.Google Scholar
  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91-109.Google Scholar
  24. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1-77.Google Scholar
  25. Gulli, C., Kohler, N., & Patriquin, M. (2007). The University Cheating Scandal. Maclean’s, 120(5), 32-36.Google Scholar
  26. Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates. Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 255-279.Google Scholar
  27. Harris, J. (1989). Ethical Values and Decision Processes of Male and Female Business Students. Journal of Education for Business, 64(5), 234-238.Google Scholar
  28. Kiriakidis, S. P. (2008). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Recidivism: The Role of Personal Norm in Predicting Behavioral Intentions of Re-Offending. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(9), 2210-2221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic Integrity: The Relationship between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381-394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klien, H. A., Levenburg, N. M., McKendall, M., & Mothersell, W. (2007). Cheating During the College Years: How Do Business Students Compare? Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 197-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knowledge: 2004, College Cheating is Bad for Business [Electronic Version]. (W.P. Carey School of Business), http://knowledge.wpcarey.asu.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1679.
  32. Lanier, M. (2006). Academic Integrity and Distance Learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(2), 244-261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lavelle, L.: 2008, ‘GMAT Cheating Controversy Grows’, Business Week, p. 13Google Scholar
  34. Lawson, R. (2004). Is Classroom Cheating Related to Business Students’ Propensity to Cheat in the “Real World?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 189-199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (1994). Academic Dishonesty Among Males in College: A Thirty Year Perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 5-10.Google Scholar
  36. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, Causes, and Proposed Action. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 294-305.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, K. (2005). Communication theories: perspectives, processes and contexts. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Nonis, S., & Smith, C. (2001). Personal Value Profiles and Ethical Business Decisions. Journal of Education for Business Ethics, 76(5), 251-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ogilby, S. (1995). The Ethics of Academic Behavior: will it Affect Professional Behavior? Journal of Education for Business, 71(2), 92-97.Google Scholar
  40. Ringle, C. M., S. Wende and S. Will: 2005, ‘SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta’, Hamburg, http://www.smartpls.de.
  41. Rokovski, C., & Levy, E. (2007). Academic Dishonesty: Perceptions of Business Students. College Student Journal, 41(2), 466-481.Google Scholar
  42. Sheppard, B., Hartwick, H., & Warshaw, P. (1988). The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sims, R. (1993). The Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207-211.Google Scholar
  44. Swift, C., Denton, L., & Nonis, S. (1998). Cheating Internet Style: Guarding Against Online Term Paper Mills. Marketing Education Review, 8(2), 19-27.Google Scholar
  45. Tenenhause, M., Vinzi, V., Chateline, Y., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thibodeau, P. (2007). Cheating on IT Exams May Cast Doubt on Their Value. Computerworld, 41(18), 1-3.Google Scholar
  47. Thompson, N.: 2000, ‘Survey Finds 1 in 3 Workers Sees Abuses’, The Sun, pp. C1–C3. 14 JuneGoogle Scholar
  48. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.Google Scholar
  49. Whitley, B. (1998). Factors Associated with Cheating Among College Students: A Review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235-274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson, B. A. (2008). Predicting Intended Unethical Behavior of Business Students. The Journal of Education for Business, 83(4), 187-195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yeo, S. (2007). First-year university science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 199-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of NevadaRenoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations