Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 93, Issue 4, pp 653–669 | Cite as

The Framing of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Globalization of National Business Systems: A Longitudinal Case Study

  • Stefan TengbladEmail author
  • Claes Ohlsson


The globalization movement in recent decades has meant rapid growth in trade, financial transactions, and cross-country ownership of economic assets. In this article, we examine how the globalization of national business systems has influenced the framing of corporate social responsibility (CSR). This is done using text analysis of CEO letters appearing in the annual reports of 15 major corporations in Sweden during a period of transformational change. The results show that the discourse about CSR in the annual reports has changed from a national and communitarian view of social responsibility (cf. a negotiated view of CSR) toward an international and individualistic view of social responsibility (cf. a self-regulating view of CSR). The article contributes theoretically (1) by adding a national–global dimension to previous conceptualizations of CSR and (2) by showing that the rise of CSR discourse and activities in the last 10 years does not have to imply an increased commitment and interest in corporate responsibility per se, only that there are increased societal expectations that corporations should develop the capability to act more independently as moral agents.


corporate social responsibility corporate responsibility globalization national business systems corporate annual reports CEO letters text analysis Sweden 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, W. and J. Monsen: 1979, ‘On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement’, The Academy of Management Journal. 22(3), 501-515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C. A., W. Hill and C. Roberts: 1998, ‘Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe’, British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu K. and G. Palazzo: 2008, Corporate Social Responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review 33(1), pp. 122–136.Google Scholar
  4. Buhr, H. and M. Grafström: 2007, ‘The Making of Meaning in the Media’, in F. den Hond, F. de Bakker, and P. Neergaard (eds.), Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action. Talking, Doing and Measuring (Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot), pp. 15-31.Google Scholar
  5. Byrkjeflot, H., S. Myklebust, C. Myrvang and F. Sejersted (eds): 2001, The Democratic Challenge to Capitalism. Management and Democracy in the Nordic Countries (Fagbokforlaget, Bergen, Norway).Google Scholar
  6. Carlsson, R. H.: 2001, Ownership and value creation (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, A. B.: 1999, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business & Society, 38, 268-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandler, A. D. Jr.: 1977, The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  9. Chapple, W. and J. Moon: 2005, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia’, Business & Society, 44, pp. 415-441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Committee for Economic Development: 1971, Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations. (CED, New York).Google Scholar
  11. de Bakker, F., F. den Hond, C. Ohlsson, S. Tengblad & M.-F. Turcotte: 2007, Tracing the Evolution of Corporate Discourse on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Longitudinal, Lexicological Study. In: F. den Hond, F. de Bakker, and P. Neergaard (eds.), Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action Talking, Doing and Measuring. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp. 52-73.Google Scholar
  12. de Bakker, F., P. Groenewegen and F. den Hond: 2005, ‘A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance’, Business & Society, 44(3), 283-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. den Hond, F., F. de Bakker, P. Neergaard, and J-P Gond: 2007, ‘Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action’, in F. den Hond, F. de Bakker, and P. Neergaard (eds.), Managing Corporate Social Responsibility in Action. Talking, Doing and Measuring (Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot), pp. 205-225.Google Scholar
  14. DiMaggio, P. J and W. W Powell, 1983 ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.’ American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Djelic, M-L., and S. Quack (eds.): 2003, Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).Google Scholar
  16. Djelic, M-L., and S. Quack: 2005, ‘Rethinking Path Dependency: The Crooked Path of Institutional Change in Post-War Germany’, in G. Morgan, R. Whitley, and E. Moen (eds.), Changing Capitalisms? (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 137-166.Google Scholar
  17. Dobers, P.: 2002, ‘Broadband: Boom and bust in the new economy’, in I. Holmberg, M. Salzer-Morling and L. Strannegard (eds.), Stuck in the Future (Book House, Stockholm), pp. 79-104.Google Scholar
  18. Göthberg, P.: 2007, ‘Varför projekt överlever: en studie av Skandias Idéer för livet’, Published Licentiate Thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  19. Guillén, M.: 1994, Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective (Chicago University Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  20. Gyllenhammar, P. G.: 1973, Jag tror på Sverige (Askild & Kärnekull, Stockholm).Google Scholar
  21. Haake, S.: 2002, ‘National Business Systems and Industry-Specific Competitiveness’, Organization Studies, 23(5), 711-736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habisch, A., J. Jonker, M. Wegner, and R. Schmidpeter: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe. (Springer, Heidelberg).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halme, M, and M. Huse: 1997, ‘The Influence of Corporate Governance, Industry and Country Factors on Environmental Reporting’, Scandinavian Management Journal. 13(2), 137-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hancké, B., and M. Goyer: 2005, ‘Degrees of Freedom: Rethinking the Institutional Analysis of Economic Change’, in G. Morgan, R. Whitley, and E. Moen (eds.), Changing Capitalisms? (Oxford University Press. Oxford), pp. 53-77.Google Scholar
  25. Henrekson M., and U. Jakobsson: 2003, ‘The Transformation of Ownership Policy and Structure in Sweden’, New Political Economy, 8(1), pp. 73-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henrekson M., and U. Jakobsson: 2005, ‘The Swedish Model of Ownership and Corporate Control in Transition’, in H. Huizinga and L. Jonung (eds.), Who will Own Europe? The Internationalization of Asset Ownership in Europe (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge), pp. 207-246.Google Scholar
  27. Holmberg, I., and L. Strannegård: 2005. ‘Leadership Voices: The Ideology of ‘the New Economy’’, Leadership, 1(3), 353-375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hopwood, A. G.: 1996, ‘Introduction’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(1), 55-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hyland, K.: 1998, ‘Exploring Corporate Rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s Letter’, The Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins, R.: 2005, ‘Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility and Poverty’, International Affairs, 81, 3, 525-540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, H. L.: 1971, Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  32. Judd, V. C., and B. J. Tims: 1991, ‘How Annual Reports Communicate a Customer Orientation’, Industrial Marketing Management, 20(4), 353-360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kohut, G., and A. Segars: 1992, ‘The President’s Letter to Stockholders: An Examination of Corporate Communication Strategy’, Journal of Business Communication, 29(1), 7-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kolk, A. and R. van Tulder: 2002, ‘The Effectiveness of Self Regulation: Corporate Codes of Conduct and Child labor’, European Management Journal, 20(3), 260-271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, T.: 1994, ‘The Changing Form of the Corporate Annual Report’, The Accounting Historians Journal, 21(1), 215-232.Google Scholar
  36. Lodge, G. C., and E. F. Vogel: 1987, Ideology and National Competitiveness (Harvard Business School Press Boston).Google Scholar
  37. Lyons, J.: 1995, Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  38. Matten, D. and J. Moon, 2005, ‘A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR., in A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner and R. Schmidpeter (eds.). Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe. (Springer, Heidelberg), pp. 335-356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review, 33(2). 404–424.Google Scholar
  40. Moen, E., and K. Lilja: 2005, ‘Change in Coordinated Market Economies: The Case of Nokia and Finland’, in G. Morgan, R. Whitley, and E. Moen (eds.), Changing Capitalisms? (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 352-380.Google Scholar
  41. Morgan, G., Whitley, R., and E. Moen (eds.) 2005, Changing Capitalisms? (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  42. Nicolin, C.: 1973, Makt och ansvar (Askild & Kärnekull, Stockholm).Google Scholar
  43. Piper, A.: 2000, ‘Some have Credit Cards and others have Giro Cheques: “Individuals” and “People” as Lifelong Learners in late Modernity’, Discourse & Society, 11(4), 515-542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roome, N.: 2005, ‘Some implications of national agendas for CSR’, in A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner and R. Schmidpeter (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe. (Springer, Heidelberg), pp. 317-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sahlin-Andersson, K.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Trend and a Movement, but of what and for what?’, Corporate Governance 6(5), 595-608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Snider, J., R. P. Hill and D. Martin: 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A view from the World’s most Successful Firms.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 48: 175-187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stanton, P. A., and J. Stanton: 2002, ‘Corporate Annual Reports: Research Perspectives Used’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(4), 478-500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stubbs, M.: 1996, Text and Corpus Analysis. Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture. (Blackwell, Oxford).Google Scholar
  49. Stubbs, M.: 2002, Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. (Blackwell, Oxford).Google Scholar
  50. Swales, J. M.: 1994, Research Genres: Explorations and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  51. Tainio, R., Houlman, M., Pulkkinen, M.: 2001, The Internationalization of Capital Markets: How International Institutional Investors are Restructuring Finnish Companies. In: Morgan, G., Kristensen P. H., Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tengblad, S.: 2003, ‘Classic but not seminal: revisiting the pioneering study of managerial work’. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(1), 85-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tengblad, S. and C. Ohlsson, C: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: The Problem of Securing External Legitimacy in a Globalized World’, Unpublished Conference Paper Presented at the 20th EGOS Colloquium, Ljubljana, Slovenia, July 1–3 2004.Google Scholar
  54. Thunholm, L.-E.: 1973, Bankerna och samhället. (Askild & Kärnekull, Stockholm).Google Scholar
  55. van Tulder, R., and A. Kolk, 2001, ‘Multinationality and Corporate Ethics. Codes of Conduct in the Sporting Goods Industry’, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 267-283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wallander, J.: 1974, I huvudet på en kapitalist. Askild & Kärnekull, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  57. Welford, R.: 2002, ‘Globalization, corporate social responsibility and human rights’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitehouse, L., 2003, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship and the Global Compact: A New Approach to Regulating Corporate Social Power?’, Global Social Policy,. 3(3), 299-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whitley, R.: 1992a, Business Systems in East Asia (SAGE, London).Google Scholar
  60. Whitley, R. (ed.): 1992b, European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in National Context (SAGE, London).Google Scholar
  61. Whitley, R.: 1999, Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  62. Whitley, R.: 2005, ‘How National are Business Systems?’, in G. Morgan, R. Whitley, and E. Moen (eds.), Changing Capitalisms? (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 190-225.Google Scholar
  63. Windell, K.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Under Construction: Ideas, Translations and Institutional Change’, Published Doctoral Dissertation, Uppsala University, Sweden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.GRI, School of Business, Economics and LawGöteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations