Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 293–305 | Cite as

Two Lighthouses to Navigate: Effects of Ideal and Counter-Ideal Values on Follower Identification and Satisfaction with Their Leaders

  • Niels van Quaquebeke
  • Rudolf Kerschreiter
  • Alice E. Buxton
  • Rolf van Dick
Article

Abstract

Ideals (or ideal values) help people to navigate in social life. They indicate at a very fundamental level what people are concerned about, what they strive for, and what they want to be affiliated with. Transferring this to a leader–follower analysis, our first study (n = 306) confirms that followers’ identification and satisfaction with their leaders are stronger, the more leaders match followers’ ideal leader values. Study 2 (n = 244) extends the perspective by introducing the novel concept of counter-ideals (i.e., how an ideal leader should not be) as a second, non-redundant point of reference. Results confirm that a leader’s match on ideal and on counter-ideal values have independent effects in that both explain unique variance in followers’ identification and satisfaction with their leader. Study 3 (n = 136) replicates the previous results in an experimental scenario study and provides evidence for the proposed causal direction of the underlying process. We conclude that counter-ideal values might be an additional point of reference that people use to triangulate targets above and beyond ideal values and discuss the implications of our findings for value research and management.

Keywords

fit followership positive and negative forces identification ideals leadership satisfaction values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P.: 2000, ‹Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization’, British Journal of Social Psychology 39, 555-577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewer, M. B.: 1991, ‹The social self: On being the same and different at the same time’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 475-482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. 1998.: On the self-regulation of behavior, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., House, R. J.: 2007, Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies, (Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers).Google Scholar
  5. Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R., & McLean Parks, J.: 1998. ‹The dark side of organizational identification’, in D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations, (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), p. 245-256.Google Scholar
  6. Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M.: 1997, ‹Avoidance achievement motivation. A personal goals analysis’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, 171-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elsbach, K. D.: 1999, ‹An expanded model of organizational identification’, Research in Organizational Behavior 21, 163-200.Google Scholar
  8. Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R.: 2004, ‹Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time’, Journal of Applied Psychology 89, 293-310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R.: 2005, ‹From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes’, Journal of Applied Psychology 90, 659-676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fried, Y., & Ferris, G.R.: 1987, ‹The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis’, Personnel Psychology 40, 287-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., & Pierce, J. L.: 1998, ‹Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 58, 898-915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heider, F.: 1958, The psychology of interpersonal relations (New York: Wiley).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V.: 2004, ‹Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies’, (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  14. Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D.: 2007, ‹Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes’, Academy of Management Review 32, 500-528.Google Scholar
  15. Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Blascovich, J.: 1996, ‹Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence’, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 22, 1128-1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E.: 2004, ‹Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 25, 1-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krishnan, V.R.: 2002, ‹Transformational leadership and value system congruence’, International Journal of Value-Based Management 15, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kristof-Brown, A.L., Zimmerman, R.D., & Johnson, E.C.: 2005, ‹Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit’, Personnel Psychology 58, 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunin, T.: 1955, ‹The construction of a new type of attitude measure’, Personnel Psychology 8, 65-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liden, R.C., Wayne S.J., & Stilwell D.: 1993, ‹A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges’, Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z.: 2002, ‹Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 854-864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loher, B.T., Noe, R.A., Moeller, N.L., & Fitzgerald, M.P.: 1985, ‹A meta-analysis of the relationship of job characteristics to job satisfaction’, Journal of Applied Psychology 70, 280-289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lord, R. G., & Brown, D. J.: 2001, ‹Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts’, The Leadership Quarterly 12, 133-152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & de Vader, C. L.: 1984, ‹A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions’, Organizational Behavior & Human Performance 34, 343-378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E.: 1992, ‹Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 13, 103-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M.: 1998, ‹Values as truisms: Evidence and implications’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 294-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markus, H., & Nurius, P.: 1986, ‹Possible selves’. American Psychologist 41, 954-969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C.: 1998, ‹Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research’, Journal of Management 24, 351-389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meglino, B.M., Ravlin E.C., & Adkins C.L.: 1989, ‹A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes’, Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L.: 1991, ‹Value congruence and satisfaction with a leader: An examination of the role of interaction’, Human Relations 44, 481-495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Offermann, L. R., Kennedy, J. K., & Wirtz, P. W.: 1994, ‹Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure, and generalizability’, The Leadership Quarterly 5, 43-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ogilvie, D. M.: 1987, ‹The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 379-385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips, A.S., & Bedeian A.G.: 1994, ‹Leader–follower exchange quality: The role of personal and interpersonal attributes’, Academy of Management Journal 37, 990–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., MacKenzie, S. B., & Lee, J.-Y.: 2003, ‹Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 879 - 903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pratt, M. G.: 2000, ‹The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors’, Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 456-493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roe, R. A., & Ester, P.: 1999, ‹Values and work: Empirical findings and theoretical perspective’, Applied Psychology: An International Review 48, 1-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rokeach, M.: 1973, The nature of human values, (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  38. Rokeach, M.: 1979, Understanding human values, (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  39. Ros, M., Schwartz, S. H., & Surkiss, S.: 1999, ‹Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work’, Applied Psychology: An International Review 48, 49-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwartz, S. H.: 1992, Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. P. Zenna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-65.Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz, S. H.: 1999, ‹A theory of cultural values and some implications for work’, Applied Psychology: An International Review 48, 23-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz, S. H.: 2006, ‹Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and application’, Revue francaise de sociologie 47, 1-19.Google Scholar
  43. Schwartz, S. H. and S. Huisman: 1995, ‹Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions’, Social Psychology Quarterly 58, 88–107.Google Scholar
  44. Senger J.: 1971, ‹Managers’ perceptions of subordinates’ competence as a function of personal value orientations’, Academy of Management Journal 14, 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shamir, B., & Kark, R.: 2004, ‹A single-item graphic scale for the measurement of organizational identification’, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 77, 115-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E.: 2007, ‹Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships’, Academy of Management Review 32, 9-32.Google Scholar
  47. Sluss, D.M., & Ashforth, B.E.: 2008, ‹How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions’, Organization Science 19, 807-823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher and M. S. Wetherell: 1987, Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, Inc.)Google Scholar
  49. van Dick, R., Hirst, G., Grojean, M., & Wiesecke, J.: 2007, ‹Relationship between leader and follower organizational identification and implications for follower attitudes and behavior’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 80, 133-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O.: 2004, ‹The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter?’, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 77, 171-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D.: 2005, ‹Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality’, Journal of Applied Psychology 90, 25-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Quaquebeke, N., S. Zenker and T. Eckloff: in press, ‹Find Out How Much It Means to Me! The Importance of Interpersonal Respect in Work Values Compared to Perceived Organizational Practices’, Journal of Business Ethics (online first). doi:10.1007/s10551-008-0008-6.
  53. van Quaquebeke, N., & Brodbeck, F. C.: 2008, ‹Entwicklung und erste Validierung zweier Instrumente zur Erfassung von Führungskräfte-Kategorisierung im deutschsprachigen Raum [Development and first validation of two scales to measure leader categorization in German-speaking countries]’, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 52, 70-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wanous, J. P., & Lawler III, E. E.: 1972, ‹Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction’. Journal of Applied Psychology 56, 95-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niels van Quaquebeke
    • 1
  • Rudolf Kerschreiter
    • 1
  • Alice E. Buxton
    • 1
  • Rolf van Dick
    • 1
  1. 1.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations