Two Lighthouses to Navigate: Effects of Ideal and Counter-Ideal Values on Follower Identification and Satisfaction with Their Leaders
- 286 Downloads
Ideals (or ideal values) help people to navigate in social life. They indicate at a very fundamental level what people are concerned about, what they strive for, and what they want to be affiliated with. Transferring this to a leader–follower analysis, our first study (n = 306) confirms that followers’ identification and satisfaction with their leaders are stronger, the more leaders match followers’ ideal leader values. Study 2 (n = 244) extends the perspective by introducing the novel concept of counter-ideals (i.e., how an ideal leader should not be) as a second, non-redundant point of reference. Results confirm that a leader’s match on ideal and on counter-ideal values have independent effects in that both explain unique variance in followers’ identification and satisfaction with their leader. Study 3 (n = 136) replicates the previous results in an experimental scenario study and provides evidence for the proposed causal direction of the underlying process. We conclude that counter-ideal values might be an additional point of reference that people use to triangulate targets above and beyond ideal values and discuss the implications of our findings for value research and management.
Keywordsfit followership positive and negative forces identification ideals leadership satisfaction values
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. 1998.: On the self-regulation of behavior, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., House, R. J.: 2007, Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies, (Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers).Google Scholar
- Dukerich, J. M., Kramer, R., & McLean Parks, J.: 1998. ‹The dark side of organizational identification’, in D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations, (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage), p. 245-256.Google Scholar
- Elsbach, K. D.: 1999, ‹An expanded model of organizational identification’, Research in Organizational Behavior 21, 163-200.Google Scholar
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V.: 2004, ‹Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies’, (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
- Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D.: 2007, ‹Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes’, Academy of Management Review 32, 500-528.Google Scholar
- Rokeach, M.: 1973, The nature of human values, (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
- Rokeach, M.: 1979, Understanding human values, (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H.: 1992, Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. P. Zenna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-65.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H.: 2006, ‹Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and application’, Revue francaise de sociologie 47, 1-19.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. and S. Huisman: 1995, ‹Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions’, Social Psychology Quarterly 58, 88–107.Google Scholar
- Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E.: 2007, ‹Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships’, Academy of Management Review 32, 9-32.Google Scholar
- Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher and M. S. Wetherell: 1987, Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, Inc.)Google Scholar
- van Quaquebeke, N., S. Zenker and T. Eckloff: in press, ‹Find Out How Much It Means to Me! The Importance of Interpersonal Respect in Work Values Compared to Perceived Organizational Practices’, Journal of Business Ethics (online first). doi:10.1007/s10551-008-0008-6.
- van Quaquebeke, N., & Brodbeck, F. C.: 2008, ‹Entwicklung und erste Validierung zweier Instrumente zur Erfassung von Führungskräfte-Kategorisierung im deutschsprachigen Raum [Development and first validation of two scales to measure leader categorization in German-speaking countries]’, Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 52, 70-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar