Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 93, Issue 2, pp 189–213 | Cite as

Leadership Styles and CSR Practice: An Examination of Sensemaking, Institutional Drivers and CSR Leadership

  • Tamsin Angus-Leppan
  • Louise MetcalfEmail author
  • Sue Benn


This article examines the explicit and implicit corporate social responsibility (CSR) framework and its implications for leadership style, in a major banking institution. Evidence for existence of the framework’s key concepts in relation to leadership styles was explored through the self-reported sensemaking of leaders charged with CSR programme introduction. Qualitative data analysis indicated that explicit CSR is linked to an autocratic leadership style, whereas implicit CSR is more closely aligned with emergent and authentic styles. Although our results reinforced key aspects of the explicit and implicit CSR framework, they demonstrated conflicting systems of both CSR and leadership within our case organisation and highlighted the difficulty in categorising such a complex concept as CSR according to specific frameworks. Overall, our data suggest that the leadership styles, needed to successfully implement explicit and implicit CSR programmes, are in conflict. Given our finding that these CSR systems can coincide within one organisation, we suggest that the debating style of transformational leadership may be the required linchpin.

Key words

corporate social responsibility institutional drivers leadership 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angus-Leppan, T. and S. Benn: 2007, Building a Framework for Implementing Total Responsibility Management. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus-Leppan. T., S. Benn and L. Young: 2009, A Sensemaking Approach to Tradeoffs and Synergies Between Human and Ecological Elements of Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choices and individual values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barker, R.A.(2001). The nature of leadership. Human Relations 54(4):469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu K, Palazzo G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. The Academy of Management Review 33(1): 122-136.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (1997). Subpolitics, ecology and the disintegration of institutional power. Organisation & Environment, 10(1): 52-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumenfield M. (2008). Brand Rankings Find Top CUs Have One Thing In Common: They Stay True To Values, Credit Union Journal 12(36)16–16Google Scholar
  8. Boerner, S., Eisenbess, S. A., & Greisser, D. (2007). Follower behaviour and organisational performance: The impact of transformational leaders. Journal of Leadership & Organisational Studies, 13(3), 16 - 26.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 97(117), 134.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell JL. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioural Scientist 49: 925-938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramer, J., van der Heijden, A. and Jonker, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: making sense through thinking and acting. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4): 380-389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crook, C.: 2005, ‘The Good Company’, Economist 37, January, 41–31Google Scholar
  14. Crossan, M. and J. Hulland (eds.): 2002, Leveraging Knowledge Through Leadership of Organisational Learning (Oxford, New York)Google Scholar
  15. Crossan, M., Vera, D., & Nanjad, L. (2008). Transcendent leadership: Strategic leadership in dynamic environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 569-581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daft RL, Weick KE. 1984. Toward a model of organisations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 284-295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297-311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Souza, G., & Klein, H. J. (1995). Emergent leadership in the group goal-setting process. Small Group Research, 26(4), 475 - 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeGroot, T., Kicker, D. S. & Cross, T.C. (2000) A meta-analysis to review organisational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17 (4), 356-371.Google Scholar
  20. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2000), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, WW., (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organisational Fields”. American Sociological Review, 48(2):147-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doh, J. and T. Guay: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective’, Journal of Management Studies, Special Issue, Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications 43, 47–73.Google Scholar
  23. Foddy, M., & Crettendon, A. (Eds.). (1994). Leadership and group identity as determinants of resource consumption in a social dilemma. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Foster, R., & Kaplan, S. (2001). Creative destruction. New York: Double Day.Google Scholar
  25. Frooman J. (1999), Stakeholder influence strategies. The Academy of Management Review. 24(2): 191-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gemmil G, Oakley J. (1992) Leadership: an alienating social myth? Human Relations 45(2): 113-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gephart, R.P. (2004), ‘From the editors: Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal’, Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 454-462.Google Scholar
  28. Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal 12(6): 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hammann, E. M., A. Habisch and H. Pechlaner: 2009, ‘Values that Create Value: Socially Responsible Business Practices in SMEs – Empirical Evidence from German Companies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 18(1), 37–51.Google Scholar
  30. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243 - 1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hobbes, T.: 1651, 1985, Leviathan (Penguin Books, Aylesbury, England)Google Scholar
  32. Ireland, R. D., & Hill, M. A. (2005). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 63-77.Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, B. (2005), ‘The Enduring Romance of Leadership Studies’, Journal of Management Studies, 42(6): 1311-1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khuntia, R., & D. Suar: 2004, ‘A Scale to Assess Ethical Leadership of Indian Private and Public Sector Managers (Author Abstract)’, Journal of Business Ethics 49(1), 13–26Google Scholar
  35. Kickul, J., & Neuman, G. (2000). Emergent leadership behaviours: The function of personality and cognitive ability in determining teamwork performance and KSAS. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(1), 27 - 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krippendorf, K. (2004), Content Analysis : An Introduction to its Methodology 2nd edn, Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, Min-Dong (2008) A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead, International Journal of Management Reviews 10(1): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leximancer: 2005, Leximancer Manual Version 2.2. Brisbane,
  39. Linnenluecke M. K., S. V. Russell and A. Griffiths: 2007, ‘Subcultures and Sustainability Practices: The Impact on Understanding Corporate Sustainability’, Business Strategy and the Environment. Online Journal, Retrieved from:
  40. Lord, R. G., De Vader, C. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perception: an application of validity generalisation procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 402 - 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perception and performance. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  42. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organisational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal 48(1): 21-49.Google Scholar
  43. March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen: 1984, ‘The New Institutionalism: Organisational Factors in Political Life’, The American Political Science Review 78(3):734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Margolis, Joshua D. and James P. Walsh 2003, ‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3): 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matten, D., Moon, J.(2005)., “United Kingdom: An Explicit Model of Business-Society Relations”, in Habisch, A.; Jonker, J.; Wagner, M.; Schmidpeter, R. (ed) Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe, pp.51-66, Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424.Google Scholar
  47. Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.). (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Orvis K. A., Dudley N. M., Cortina J. M., (2008). Conscientiousness and Reactions to Psychological Contract Breach: A Longitudinal Field Study, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1183–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Phillips C. (2008). Tapping into the Next Talent Generation, Strategic HR Review 7, 26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Plowman, D. A., Solansky, S., Beck, T. E., Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., & Travis, D. V. (2007). The role of leadership in emergent, self-organisation. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 341-356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rousseau, D. (1998) ‘The “Problem” of the Psychological Contract Considered’, Journal of Organisational Behavior, 19, 665–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rubin, R. S., Bartels, L. K., & Bommer, W. H. (2002). Are leaders smarter or do they just seem that way? Exploring perceived intellectual competence and leadership emergence. Social Behaviour and Personality, 30(2), 105 - 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rutte, C. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1984). Social dilemmas and leadership. European Journal of Social Psychology 14, 294 - 309.Google Scholar
  55. Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (1986). Inequities in access to and use of shared resources in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 960 - 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (Eds.). (1995). When do people want to change the rules for allocating shared resources?. New York: Preager.Google Scholar
  57. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. 2003, Research Methods for Business Students, 3rd edn, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  58. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation and creativity: Evidence from Korea, Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703 - 714.Google Scholar
  59. Siegal, D.: 2009, Green Management Matters Only If It Yields More Green. An Economic/Strategic Perspective 23(3):5–16Google Scholar
  60. Stewart, G.: 2002, ‘Uncovering Implicit Leadership Beliefs: Variation Between Information Technology (IT) Executives and Business Executives in a Public Service Agency’, International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 5, January, Accessed 1 July 2009
  61. Sully de Luque, M., N. T. Washburn and D. A. Waldman: 2006, Unrequited Profits: Evidence for the Stakeholder Perspective. Paper presented at the Gallup Leadership Institute SummitGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor JR, Van Every EJ. (2000). The Emergent Organisation: Communication as Its Site and Surface. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  63. Tesch, R. (1990), Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools, The Faller Press: New York.Google Scholar
  64. Thomas, T., Schermerhorn Jr, J. R., & Dienhart, J. W. (2004). Strategic leadership of ethical behavior in business. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 56-66.Google Scholar
  65. Trevino, L. K., L. P. Hartman and M. Brown: 2000, ‘Moral Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop a Reputation for Ethical Leadership’, California Management Review 42, 128–142Google Scholar
  66. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Vugt M., Hogan R., Kaiser R. (2008). Leadership, Followership, and Evolution: Some Lessons from the Past. American Psychologist, 63, 182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Vugt, M., & De Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587 - 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 1-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership and organisational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 29, 222 - 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vitell S., Singhapakdi A. (2007). The Role of Ethics Institutionalization in Influencing Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Esprit de Corps. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Waddock S.: 2008, ‘Building a New Institutional Infrastructure for Corporate Responsibility’, Academy of Management Perspectives 22, 87–108Google Scholar
  73. Waddock S, Bodwell C. (2007). Total Responsibility Management: The Manual. Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  74. Waldman, D. A., & Siegel, D. (2008). Defining the socially responsible leader. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 117-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Waldman, D.A., Siegel, D.S. and Javidan, M. (2006), ‘Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Management Studies, 43(8): 1703-1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waldman, D.A., Sully de Luque, M., Washburn, N. and House, R.J. (2006), ‘Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries’, Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 823-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. J., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organisations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  79. Weick KE. (2001). Making Sense of the Organisation. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  80. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organisation Science 16(4): 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilke, H. A. M. (Ed.). (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. (Vol. 2). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Yin, R.K. (2003), Applications of Case Study Research, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  83. Yukl, G. (2001) Leadership in Organisations. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  84. Ziller, R. C. (1965). Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psychological Bulletin, 64(3), 164 - 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations