Challenges to Legitimacy at the Forest Stewardship Council
- 1.1k Downloads
The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a global private governance system overseeing the sustainability and biodiversity of the world forestry system through certification of forests and forestry processes and products, and is perceived as the strongest of the various certification schemes available (Domask, Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society, 2003; Gulbrandsen, Global Environmental Politics, 2004). It has seen more success in developed than developing countries in terms of amount of forest certified and number of chain-of-custody certificates issued, raising questions as to its ability to promote biodiversity Gulbrandsen, Global Environmental Politics, 2004). A number of challenges have risen to the pragmatic and moral legitimacy of the FSC as a global governance system: alternative certification schemes, output and market access, cost of certification, plantations, and illegal logging. I examine each of these challenges as they pertain to the dimensions of pragmatic and moral legitimacy of the FSC. I conclude with a discussion of theoretical implications for global governance systems using ecolabel schemes, as well as a discussion of practical implications for the FSC in particular.
Keywordscorporate responsibility sustainability forestry legitimacy global governance Certification Systems ecolabel
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bernstein, S.: 2004, The Elusive Basis of Legitimacy in Global Governance: Three Conceptions. Globalization and Autonomy Working Paper Series, Institute for Globalization and the Human Condition, McMaster University.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B.: 2004, ‹Is forest certification a legitimate alternative to a global forest convention?’, in J. J. Kirton & M. J. Trebilcock (eds.) Hard Choices, Soft Law: Voluntary Standards in Global Trade, Environment and Social Governance (Global Environmental Governance) (Surrey, UK: Ashgate).Google Scholar
- Blichfeldt, G.: 1998, Green Labels for Fish Products – Consumer Power vs. Democracy? Paper Presented at the 9th International Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, (Tromso, Norway).Google Scholar
- Brack, D.: 2005, ‹Controlling illegal logging and the trade in illegally harvested timber: The EU’s Forest Law enforcement, governance and trade initiative’, Receil 14, 28-38.Google Scholar
- Clapp, J.: 1998, ‹The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world’, Global Governance 4, 295-316.Google Scholar
- Cornes, R., & Sandler, T.: 1986, The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Domask, J.: 2003, ‹From boycotts to global partnership: NGOs, the private sector, and the struggle to protect the world’s forests’, in J.P. Doh and H. Teegen (eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming Business, Government, and Society (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers), pp. 157–186.Google Scholar
- Down in the woods: March 23, 2006, The Economist, http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_VGVQJST.
- Hobbes, T.: 1999, Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth, Ecclesiasticall and Civill (Hamilton, ONT: McMaster University) (Original work published 1651).Google Scholar
- Jepperson, R. L.: 1991, ‹Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism’, in W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp.143-163.Google Scholar
- Matten, D., & Crane, A.: 2005, ‹Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization’, Academy of Management Review 30, 166-179.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E.: 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
- Pattberg, P.: 2005a, ‹The institutionalization of private governance: How business and nonprofit organizations agree on transnational rules’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18, 589-610.Google Scholar
- Peters, B.G. & Pierre, J.: 1998, ‹Governance without government? Rethinking public administration’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2), 223-243.Google Scholar
- Sethi, S. P.: 2003, Setting Global Standards: Guidelines for Creating Codes of Conduct in Multinational Corporations (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
- ‹World’s Forests Continue to Shrink’: 2006, June 1, USA Today, p. 16.Google Scholar
- World Rainforest Movement: 2003, Certifying the Uncertifiable (Montevideo, UR), http://www.wrm.org.uy.