The Association Between Ethical Conflict and Adverse Outcomes
- 452 Downloads
In this study, we consider the association between ethical conflict and adverse outcomes, including employee stress, (lack of) organizational commitment, absenteeism, and turnover intention. Our findings show that ethical conflict is associated with adverse outcomes. Our results identify the importance of ethical conflict for organizations and the benefit for organizations to address and mitigate ethical conflict. In addition, our research contributes to the person–organization and turnover literature by extending the person-fit framework to the ethical domain and by suggesting that ethical conflict can be useful in predicting turnover. The findings of our study reinforce the need to minimize ethical conflict in the workplace due to the organizational costs associated with ethical conflict.
Keywordsethical conflict turnover stress absentism organizational conflict
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study was funded by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. A special thank to Joanne Smith-Young for her research assistance, and to the nurses who participated in this study.
- D’Sylva, A., & Beagan, B. 2003, ‹Ethical tensions in the caring professions: A summary report of interviews with Registered Nurses in Nova Scotia’, Halifax: School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
- French, J., Caplan, R., & Harrison, R. 1982, The Mechanisms of Job Stress and Strain (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
- Meyer, J., & Allen, N. 1997, Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Application (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications).Google Scholar
- Mowday, R., Porter, L., & Steers, R. 1982, Employee Organization Linkages (San Diego, CA: Academic Press).Google Scholar
- Patchen, M. 1970, Participation, Achievement and Involvement on the Job (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
- Rodney, P., & Starzomski, R. (1993). Constraints on the moral agency of nurses. The Canadian Nurse, 89(9), 23–26.Google Scholar
- Rokeach, M. 1968, Beliefs, Attitudes and Values (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
- Rokeach, M. 1973, The Nature of Human Values (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
- Seashore, S., Lawler, E., Mirvis, P., & Cammann, C. (Eds.). 1982, ‹Observing and Measuring Organizational Change: A Guide to Field Practice’ (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
- Steers, R., & Mowday, R. 1981 ‹Employee turnover and post-decision justification’. in: L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 3rd edition. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 235-282.Google Scholar
- Victor, B., & Cullen, J. 1987, ‹A theory and measure of ethical climate in organizations’, in W.C. Frederick (eds.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 51-71.Google Scholar
- Werbel, J., & Gilliland, S. (1999). Person-environment fit in the selection process. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 17, 209–243.Google Scholar