Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity
The empirical relationship between a firm’s social performance and its financial performance is still not well established in the literature. Despite more than 30 years of research and more than 100 empirical studies on the issue, the results are still mixed. We argue that the heterogeneous results found in previous studies are not due exclusively to problems related with the measurement instruments or the samples used. Instead, we posit that a more fundamental problem related with the endogeneity of social strategic decisions could be driving most of the empirical findings. We show that, using a panel data of 658 firms from 1991 to 2005, how some of the results found in previous research change, and some are even reversed when endogeneity is properly taken into account.
Keywordscorporate social responsibility endogeneity financial performance social performance stakeholder management
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baum, C. F.: 2006, An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata (Stata Press, Texas).Google Scholar
- Baum, C. F., M. E. Schaffer and S. Stillman: 2007, Enhanced Routines for Instrumental Variables/GMM Estimation and Testing. Boston College Economics Working Paper No. 667.Google Scholar
- Collins, J. C. and J. I. Porras: 1994, Built to last: successful habits of visionary companies, (HarperBusiness, New York).Google Scholar
- Fernández, P.: 2002, Valuation methods and shareholder value creation , (Academic Press, San Diego CA).Google Scholar
- Garcia-Castro, R., M. A. Canela and M. A. Ariño: 2008, ‹Over the Long Run? Short-Run Impact and Long-Run Consequences of Stakeholder Management’, Business and Society, doi:10.1177/0007650308315493.
- Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett: 1994, ‹Linking organizational context and managerial action: the dimensions of quality of management’, Strategic Management Journal 15(5), 91-112.Google Scholar
- Greene, W. H.: 1993, Econometric analysis, 2nd edition, (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
- Hayes, R. and W. J. Abernathy: 1980, ‹Managing our way to economic decline’, Harvard Business Review 58(4), 67-78.Google Scholar
- Margolis, J. and J. Walsh: 2001, People and profits?, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey).Google Scholar
- Masten, S. E.: 1996, ‹Empirical research and transaction cost economic: challenges, progress, directions’, in J. Grownewegen (ed.), Transaction cost economics and beyond, (Kluwer, Boston MA,), pp. 43-64.Google Scholar
- Moskowitz, M.: 1972, ‹Choosing socially responsible stocks’, Business and Society Review 1, 71-75.Google Scholar
- Perez-Lopez, J. A.: 1993, ‹Fundamentos de la dirección de empresas’, (Ediciones Rialp, Madrid).Google Scholar
- Post, J. E., L. E. Preston and Sachs, S.: 2002, ‹Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view’, California Management Review 45(1), 6-28.Google Scholar
- Preston, L. E. and J. E. Post: 1975, ‹Measuring Corporate Responsibility’, Journal of General Management 2(3), 45-52.Google Scholar
- Shea, J.: 1997, ‹Instrument Relevance in Multivariate Linear Models: A Simple Measure’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 79(2), 348-352.Google Scholar
- Stern Stewart: 1996, The Stern Stewart Performance 1000, (Stern Stewart Management Services, New York).Google Scholar
- Stock, J. H. and M. Yogo: 2004, Testing For Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression’, Working Paper, Harvard University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Villalonga, B.: 2004, ‹Does Diversification Cause the “Diversification Discount”?’, Financial Management 33(2), 5-27.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. M.: 2002, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar